New Federal Teacher Preparation Accountability Regulation: Reshaping Political, Professional, and Market Forces

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: New Federal Teacher Preparation Accountability Regulation: Reshaping Political, Professional, and Market Forces
Language: English
Authors: Fernandez Cofre, Maria Beatriz, Burton, Stephani
Source: AERA Online Paper Repository. 2016.
Availability: AERA Online Paper Repository. Available from: American Educational Research Association. 1430 K Street NW Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-238-3200; Fax: 202-238-3250; e-mail: subscriptions@aera.net; Web site: http://www.aera.net
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Accountability, Policy Analysis, Teacher Education, Political Influences, Neoliberalism, Educational Policy, Higher Education, Federal Regulation, Correlation, Teacher Education Programs, Teacher Effectiveness, Economic Factors, Knowledge Economy, Professional Associations, Teacher Educators, Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Teacher Evaluation, Criticism, Program Improvement, Administrative Organization, Federal State Relationship
Abstract: This study offers a critical policy analysis of the 2014 teacher preparation regulation proposed by the federal government, designed to alter the higher education accountability system. Using frame analysis and Burke's Accountability Triangle (2005), we reviewed 74 policy documents and tools, media artifacts, and position statements relevant to the new regulation. Our critical analysis revealed a shift between the political, professional, and market forces identified by Burke (2005) in higher education accountability systems. The new federal regulation concentrates political accountability forces within the U.S. Department of Education, limiting autonomy at the state level. Our analysis also revealed that the political and market forces overlapped, as political priorities are directly connected to market interests and logic.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Access URL: https://www.aera.net/Publications/Online-Paper-Repository/AERA-Online-Paper-Repository
Accession Number: ED595521
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study offers a critical policy analysis of the 2014 teacher preparation regulation proposed by the federal government, designed to alter the higher education accountability system. Using frame analysis and Burke's Accountability Triangle (2005), we reviewed 74 policy documents and tools, media artifacts, and position statements relevant to the new regulation. Our critical analysis revealed a shift between the political, professional, and market forces identified by Burke (2005) in higher education accountability systems. The new federal regulation concentrates political accountability forces within the U.S. Department of Education, limiting autonomy at the state level. Our analysis also revealed that the political and market forces overlapped, as political priorities are directly connected to market interests and logic.