Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers
Saved in:
| Title: | Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Griffith, David, Tyner, Adam, Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation |
| Source: | Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 2019. |
| Availability: | Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 80 |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Achelis and Bodman Foundations Sarah Scaife Foundation |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 |
| Descriptors: | Discipline Policy, Change, Teacher Attitudes, African American Teachers, Whites, Elementary Secondary Education, Suspension, Student Behavior, Behavior Problems, Poverty, Socioeconomic Influences, Violence, Racial Differences, Accountability, Positive Behavior Supports, Student Placement, Expulsion |
| Abstract: | The public debate over discipline policy remains depressingly polarized and simplistic. Advocates of reform argue that suspensions and other forms of exclusionary discipline are associated with negative outcomes, including higher rates of criminal justice involvement--and that they are implemented unfairly. In contrast, skeptics argue that we must consider the interests of all students, not just those who misbehave, that schools depend on suspensions and the like to maintain order, and that the proposed alternatives are unproven and unrealistic. Because school discipline is so difficult to study, most of the research associated with the topic cannot be considered causal. Consequently, both advocates and critics of reform have often resorted to impassioned rhetoric. What they haven't done often enough since the discipline debate began is solicit input from the individuals with the most firsthand experience with discipline problems and the proposed solutions--namely, our teachers. Accordingly, this study asks a nationally representative sample of African American and white teachers in grade 3-12 classrooms what they think about school discipline. [Foreword and executive summary by Amber M. Northern and Michael J. Petrilli.] |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2019 |
| Accession Number: | ED597759 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED597759 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED597759 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Griffith%2C+David%22">Griffith, David</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tyner%2C+Adam%22">Tyner, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22">Thomas B. Fordham Institute</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Foundation%22">Thomas B. Fordham Foundation</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22"><i>Thomas B. Fordham Institute</i></searchLink>. 2019. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 80 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Achelis and Bodman Foundations<br />Sarah Scaife Foundation – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+3%22">Grade 3</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+10%22">Grade 10</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discipline+Policy%22">Discipline Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change%22">Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22African+American+Teachers%22">African American Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Whites%22">Whites</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Suspension%22">Suspension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Behavior%22">Student Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Problems%22">Behavior Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poverty%22">Poverty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Socioeconomic+Influences%22">Socioeconomic Influences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Violence%22">Violence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Differences%22">Racial Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Positive+Behavior+Supports%22">Positive Behavior Supports</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Placement%22">Student Placement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expulsion%22">Expulsion</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The public debate over discipline policy remains depressingly polarized and simplistic. Advocates of reform argue that suspensions and other forms of exclusionary discipline are associated with negative outcomes, including higher rates of criminal justice involvement--and that they are implemented unfairly. In contrast, skeptics argue that we must consider the interests of all students, not just those who misbehave, that schools depend on suspensions and the like to maintain order, and that the proposed alternatives are unproven and unrealistic. Because school discipline is so difficult to study, most of the research associated with the topic cannot be considered causal. Consequently, both advocates and critics of reform have often resorted to impassioned rhetoric. What they haven't done often enough since the discipline debate began is solicit input from the individuals with the most firsthand experience with discipline problems and the proposed solutions--namely, our teachers. Accordingly, this study asks a nationally representative sample of African American and white teachers in grade 3-12 classrooms what they think about school discipline. [Foreword and executive summary by Amber M. Northern and Michael J. Petrilli.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED597759 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED597759 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 80 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Discipline Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: African American Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Whites Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Suspension Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Poverty Type: general – SubjectFull: Socioeconomic Influences Type: general – SubjectFull: Violence Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Positive Behavior Supports Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Placement Type: general – SubjectFull: Expulsion Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Griffith, David – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tyner, Adam IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 30 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2019 Titles: – TitleFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |