Combatting Academic Corruption and Enhancing Integrity: Inventory of Key Questions for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Organizations

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Combatting Academic Corruption and Enhancing Integrity: Inventory of Key Questions for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Organizations
Language: English
Authors: Council for Higher Education Accreditation
Source: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. 2019.
Availability: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. One Dupont Circle Suite 510, Washington, DC 20016. Tel: 202-955-6126; Fax: 202-955-6129; e-mail: chea@chea.org; Web site: http://www.chea.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Integrity, Quality Assurance, Accreditation (Institutions), Accountability, Educational Malpractice, Standards, Higher Education, Expertise, Advocacy, Policy Formation, Institutional Cooperation, Cheating, Plagiarism, Deception, Observation
Abstract: Academic corruption in its different forms is not a new phenomenon. The Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been active in addressing this area for a number of years. In cooperation with UNESCO, it issued an "Advisory Statement on Discouraging Degree Mills" (see ED603204). The document was prepared for the 2009 UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education and had an impact on the Communiqué the Conference adopted. As academic corruption expanded further, far beyond degree and accreditation mills alone, CHEA's International Quality Group (CIQG), working closely with UNESCO's International Institute for International Planning (IIEP), issued another publication, an "Advisory on Combatting Corruption and Enhancing Integrity in Higher Education" (see ED603202) in 2016. As follow-up to the Advisory, CHEA/CIQG raised awareness about its findings through webinars, articles and Policy Briefs. Finally, based on the findings and recommendations of a CIQG commissioned worldwide "Survey on Policies and Actions of Accreditation and Quality Assurance Bodies to Counter Corruption in Higher Education" (see ED597946), CIQG is taking steps to encourage additional action by quality assurance bodies to fight academic corruption. The major findings of the 2019 survey are: (1) There is evidence of significant corruption in higher education; (2) Awareness of academic corruption is greater in some regions or countries than others; and (3) Most current quality assurance methods are unlikely to uncover academic corruption. Based on the evidence demonstrated by the Survey that quality assurance/accreditation bodies, with a few exceptions, play a limited role in combatting academic corruption, the purpose of this Inventory is to provide ideas and suggestions to quality assurance bodies to further engage and assume greater responsibility in this area. The Inventory is based on the recommendations provided in the Survey, the Advisory Statement and suggestions from additional experts.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: ED603173
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED603173
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED603173
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Combatting Academic Corruption and Enhancing Integrity: Inventory of Key Questions for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Organizations
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Council+for+Higher+Education+Accreditation%22">Council for Higher Education Accreditation</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Council+for+Higher+Education+Accreditation%22"><i>Council for Higher Education Accreditation</i></searchLink>. 2019.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Council for Higher Education Accreditation. One Dupont Circle Suite 510, Washington, DC 20016. Tel: 202-955-6126; Fax: 202-955-6129; e-mail: chea@chea.org; Web site: http://www.chea.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 12
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrity%22">Integrity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+Assurance%22">Quality Assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accreditation+%28Institutions%29%22">Accreditation (Institutions)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Malpractice%22">Educational Malpractice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advocacy%22">Advocacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Cooperation%22">Institutional Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cheating%22">Cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plagiarism%22">Plagiarism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deception%22">Deception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Observation%22">Observation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Academic corruption in its different forms is not a new phenomenon. The Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been active in addressing this area for a number of years. In cooperation with UNESCO, it issued an "Advisory Statement on Discouraging Degree Mills" (see ED603204). The document was prepared for the 2009 UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education and had an impact on the Communiqué the Conference adopted. As academic corruption expanded further, far beyond degree and accreditation mills alone, CHEA's International Quality Group (CIQG), working closely with UNESCO's International Institute for International Planning (IIEP), issued another publication, an "Advisory on Combatting Corruption and Enhancing Integrity in Higher Education" (see ED603202) in 2016. As follow-up to the Advisory, CHEA/CIQG raised awareness about its findings through webinars, articles and Policy Briefs. Finally, based on the findings and recommendations of a CIQG commissioned worldwide "Survey on Policies and Actions of Accreditation and Quality Assurance Bodies to Counter Corruption in Higher Education" (see ED597946), CIQG is taking steps to encourage additional action by quality assurance bodies to fight academic corruption. The major findings of the 2019 survey are: (1) There is evidence of significant corruption in higher education; (2) Awareness of academic corruption is greater in some regions or countries than others; and (3) Most current quality assurance methods are unlikely to uncover academic corruption. Based on the evidence demonstrated by the Survey that quality assurance/accreditation bodies, with a few exceptions, play a limited role in combatting academic corruption, the purpose of this Inventory is to provide ideas and suggestions to quality assurance bodies to further engage and assume greater responsibility in this area. The Inventory is based on the recommendations provided in the Survey, the Advisory Statement and suggestions from additional experts.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED603173
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED603173
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Integrity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality Assurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accreditation (Institutions)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accountability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Malpractice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Standards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expertise
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Advocacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Institutional Cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cheating
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Plagiarism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Deception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Observation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Combatting Academic Corruption and Enhancing Integrity: Inventory of Key Questions for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Organizations
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Council for Higher Education Accreditation
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Council for Higher Education Accreditation
              Type: main
ResultId 1