Improving Performance and Retention in Introductory Biology with a Utility-Value Intervention

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Improving Performance and Retention in Introductory Biology with a Utility-Value Intervention
Language: English
Authors: Canning, Elizabeth A., Harackiewicz, Judith M., Priniski, Stacy J., Hecht, Cameron A., Tibbetts, Yoi, Hyde, Janet S.
Source: Grantee Submission. 2018 110(6).
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2018
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (DHHS)
Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R01GM102703
R305B090009
R305B150003
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Biology, Science Instruction, Academic Persistence, Intervention, Science Achievement, Learner Engagement, Undergraduate Students, Writing Assignments, Assignments, STEM Education, Majors (Students), Essays, Comparative Analysis, Science Interests, Grades (Scholastic), Correlation, Writing Instruction
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000244
ISSN: 0022-0663
Abstract: One way to encourage performance and persistence in STEM fields is to have students write about the utility value (UV) or personal relevance of course topics to their life. This intervention has been shown to increase engagement and performance in introductory courses. However, questions remain about the longevity of the effects and how best to implement the intervention in terms of dosage and timing. We tested a UV intervention in the first semester of a 2-semester introductory biology sequence. For each of 3 units across the semester, students (N = 577) were randomly assigned to receive either a UV writing assignment, in which they explained why course material was useful to them personally, or a control assignment, in which they summarized course material. This fully crossed design tested the effect of UV dosage level (0, 1, 2, or 3 UV assignments) as well as the effect of timing (e.g., UV first, control first). We found that students exposed to any dosage of UV earned higher grades in the course, were more likely to enroll in the second course of the biology sequence, and were less likely to abandon their STEM major than students who did not receive any UV assignments. In terms of timing, students with a history of poor performance benefitted from writing a UV essay in the beginning of the semester, whereas higher-performing students benefitted from a UV essay at the end of the semester. Recommendations for practice are discussed. [This article was published in "Journal of Educational Psychology" (EJ1187677).]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: ED605474
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED605474
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED605474
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Improving Performance and Retention in Introductory Biology with a Utility-Value Intervention
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Canning%2C+Elizabeth+A%2E%22">Canning, Elizabeth A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harackiewicz%2C+Judith+M%2E%22">Harackiewicz, Judith M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Priniski%2C+Stacy+J%2E%22">Priniski, Stacy J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hecht%2C+Cameron+A%2E%22">Hecht, Cameron A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tibbetts%2C+Yoi%22">Tibbetts, Yoi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hyde%2C+Janet+S%2E%22">Hyde, Janet S.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2018 110(6).
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 16
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Institutes of Health (DHHS)<br />Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R01GM102703<br />R305B090009<br />R305B150003
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Introductory+Courses%22">Introductory Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Persistence%22">Academic Persistence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Achievement%22">Science Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Assignments%22">Writing Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Assignments%22">Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Majors+%28Students%29%22">Majors (Students)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essays%22">Essays</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Interests%22">Science Interests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/edu0000244
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0022-0663
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: One way to encourage performance and persistence in STEM fields is to have students write about the utility value (UV) or personal relevance of course topics to their life. This intervention has been shown to increase engagement and performance in introductory courses. However, questions remain about the longevity of the effects and how best to implement the intervention in terms of dosage and timing. We tested a UV intervention in the first semester of a 2-semester introductory biology sequence. For each of 3 units across the semester, students (N = 577) were randomly assigned to receive either a UV writing assignment, in which they explained why course material was useful to them personally, or a control assignment, in which they summarized course material. This fully crossed design tested the effect of UV dosage level (0, 1, 2, or 3 UV assignments) as well as the effect of timing (e.g., UV first, control first). We found that students exposed to any dosage of UV earned higher grades in the course, were more likely to enroll in the second course of the biology sequence, and were less likely to abandon their STEM major than students who did not receive any UV assignments. In terms of timing, students with a history of poor performance benefitted from writing a UV essay in the beginning of the semester, whereas higher-performing students benefitted from a UV essay at the end of the semester. Recommendations for practice are discussed. [This article was published in "Journal of Educational Psychology" (EJ1187677).]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED605474
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED605474
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/edu0000244
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Introductory Courses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Persistence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Assignments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Assignments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: STEM Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Majors (Students)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Essays
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Interests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Improving Performance and Retention in Introductory Biology with a Utility-Value Intervention
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Canning, Elizabeth A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Harackiewicz, Judith M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Priniski, Stacy J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hecht, Cameron A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tibbetts, Yoi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hyde, Janet S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0022-0663
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 110
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Grantee Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1