Asymmetry by Design? Identity Obfuscation, Reputational Pressure, and Consumer Predation in U.S. For-Profit Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.2020
Saved in:
| Title: | Asymmetry by Design? Identity Obfuscation, Reputational Pressure, and Consumer Predation in U.S. For-Profit Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.2020 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Goldstein, Adam, Eaton, Charlie, University of California, Berkeley. Center for Studies in Higher Education |
| Source: | Center for Studies in Higher Education. 2020. |
| Availability: | Center for Studies in Higher Education. University of California, Berkeley, 771 Evans Hall #4650, Berkeley, CA 94720-4650. Tel: 510-642-5040; Fax: 510-643-6845; e-mail: cshe@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 44 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Overdeck Family Foundation |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Consumer Economics, Merchandise Information, Deception, Reputation, Colleges, Proprietary Schools, Marketing, Student Recruitment, Costs, Graduation Rate, Outcomes of Education, Wages, Loan Repayment, Student Loan Programs, Law Enforcement |
| Abstract: | This article develops and tests an identity-based account of malfeasance in consumer markets. It is hypothesized that multi-brand organizational structures help predatory firms short-circuit reputational discipline by rendering their underlying identities opaque to consumer audiences. The analysis utilizes comprehensive administrative data on all for-profit U.S. colleges, an industry characterized by widespread fraud and poor (though variable) educational outcomes. Consistent with the hypothesis that brand differentiation facilitates malfeasance by reducing ex ante reputational risks, colleges which are part of multi-brand companies invest less in instruction, have worse student outcomes, and are more likely to face legal and regulatory sanctions (relative to single-brand firms). Maintaining multiple outward-facing brand identities also mitigates reputational penalties in the wake of law enforcement actions, as measured by news coverage of the legal action, and by subsequent enrollment growth. The results suggest that identity multiplicity plays a key role in allowing firms to persist in furnishing sub-standard products, even amid frequent scandals and media scrutiny. Predatory practices are facilitated not only from the inherent informational asymmetries in a given product, but also from firms' efforts to make themselves less legible to audiences. The analysis contributes to research on higher education, organizational theory, and the sociology of markets. [Additional funding for this research was provided by the University of California.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | ED606655 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED606655 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED606655 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Asymmetry by Design? Identity Obfuscation, Reputational Pressure, and Consumer Predation in U.S. For-Profit Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.2020 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goldstein%2C+Adam%22">Goldstein, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eaton%2C+Charlie%22">Eaton, Charlie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22University+of+California%2C+Berkeley%2E+Center+for+Studies+in+Higher+Education%22">University of California, Berkeley. Center for Studies in Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Center+for+Studies+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Center for Studies in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2020. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Center for Studies in Higher Education. University of California, Berkeley, 771 Evans Hall #4650, Berkeley, CA 94720-4650. Tel: 510-642-5040; Fax: 510-643-6845; e-mail: cshe@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 44 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Overdeck Family Foundation – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consumer+Economics%22">Consumer Economics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Merchandise+Information%22">Merchandise Information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deception%22">Deception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reputation%22">Reputation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colleges%22">Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proprietary+Schools%22">Proprietary Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marketing%22">Marketing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Recruitment%22">Student Recruitment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Costs%22">Costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduation+Rate%22">Graduation Rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wages%22">Wages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Loan+Repayment%22">Loan Repayment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Loan+Programs%22">Student Loan Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Law+Enforcement%22">Law Enforcement</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article develops and tests an identity-based account of malfeasance in consumer markets. It is hypothesized that multi-brand organizational structures help predatory firms short-circuit reputational discipline by rendering their underlying identities opaque to consumer audiences. The analysis utilizes comprehensive administrative data on all for-profit U.S. colleges, an industry characterized by widespread fraud and poor (though variable) educational outcomes. Consistent with the hypothesis that brand differentiation facilitates malfeasance by reducing ex ante reputational risks, colleges which are part of multi-brand companies invest less in instruction, have worse student outcomes, and are more likely to face legal and regulatory sanctions (relative to single-brand firms). Maintaining multiple outward-facing brand identities also mitigates reputational penalties in the wake of law enforcement actions, as measured by news coverage of the legal action, and by subsequent enrollment growth. The results suggest that identity multiplicity plays a key role in allowing firms to persist in furnishing sub-standard products, even amid frequent scandals and media scrutiny. Predatory practices are facilitated not only from the inherent informational asymmetries in a given product, but also from firms' efforts to make themselves less legible to audiences. The analysis contributes to research on higher education, organizational theory, and the sociology of markets. [Additional funding for this research was provided by the University of California.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED606655 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED606655 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 44 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Consumer Economics Type: general – SubjectFull: Merchandise Information Type: general – SubjectFull: Deception Type: general – SubjectFull: Reputation Type: general – SubjectFull: Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Proprietary Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Marketing Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Recruitment Type: general – SubjectFull: Costs Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduation Rate Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Wages Type: general – SubjectFull: Loan Repayment Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Loan Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Law Enforcement Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Asymmetry by Design? Identity Obfuscation, Reputational Pressure, and Consumer Predation in U.S. For-Profit Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.5.2020 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: University of California, Berkeley. Center for Studies in Higher Education – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Goldstein, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Eaton, Charlie IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2020 Titles: – TitleFull: Center for Studies in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |