Review and Renewal of Qualifications: Towards Methodologies for Analysing and Comparing Learning Outcomes. Cedefop Research Paper. No 82
Saved in:
| Title: | Review and Renewal of Qualifications: Towards Methodologies for Analysing and Comparing Learning Outcomes. Cedefop Research Paper. No 82 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cedefop - European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training |
| Source: | Cedefop - European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. 2021. |
| Availability: | Cedefop - European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. P.O. Box 22427, Finikas, Thessaloniki, GR-55102. Tel: 30-2310-490111; Fax: 30-2310-490049; e-mail: info@cedefop.europa.eu; Web site: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 152 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Vocational Education, Outcomes of Education, Education Work Relationship, Qualifications, Data Collection, Data Analysis, Labor Market, Occupational Surveys, Foreign Countries, Employers, Supply and Demand, Labor Needs, Pretesting, Graduate Surveys |
| Geographic Terms: | Europe, European Union, Lithuania, Netherlands, Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Ireland, Spain, United Kingdom (England) |
| ISSN: | 1831-5860 |
| Abstract: | The feedback between vocational education and training (VET) and the labour market can provide important input for the review and renewal of qualifications. A feedback loop that is based on learning outcomes helps provide deeper insights into what is required on the labour market, what is offered in training provisions and assessed at the end of a learning programme. The aim of this study is to contribute to strengthening the quality and relevance of qualifications and completing the feedback loop between education and the labour market. It examines methods of collecting data on the match/mismatch between qualifications and labour market requirements, including analysis of how achieved learning outcomes are applied and perceived in the labour market (for example methods of collecting the experience of employers with holders of these qualifications). This report addresses the following two questions: (1) which data already exist in the countries, providing insight into the relevance of qualifications to employees, employers and other labour market stakeholders?; and (2) how can survey methodology be designed to systematically capture the experiences and appreciations of employers as regards the content and profile of qualifications? To what extent, based on limited testing, can scalability of the methodology be achieved? |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | ED617370 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | The feedback between vocational education and training (VET) and the labour market can provide important input for the review and renewal of qualifications. A feedback loop that is based on learning outcomes helps provide deeper insights into what is required on the labour market, what is offered in training provisions and assessed at the end of a learning programme. The aim of this study is to contribute to strengthening the quality and relevance of qualifications and completing the feedback loop between education and the labour market. It examines methods of collecting data on the match/mismatch between qualifications and labour market requirements, including analysis of how achieved learning outcomes are applied and perceived in the labour market (for example methods of collecting the experience of employers with holders of these qualifications). This report addresses the following two questions: (1) which data already exist in the countries, providing insight into the relevance of qualifications to employees, employers and other labour market stakeholders?; and (2) how can survey methodology be designed to systematically capture the experiences and appreciations of employers as regards the content and profile of qualifications? To what extent, based on limited testing, can scalability of the methodology be achieved? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1831-5860 |
