Think Again: 'College Admissions Exams Drive Higher Education Inequities'
Saved in:
| Title: | Think Again: 'College Admissions Exams Drive Higher Education Inequities' |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Tyner, Adam, Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation |
| Source: | Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 2023. |
| Availability: | Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Barriers, Equal Education, Minority Group Students, College Admission, College Entrance Examinations, Higher Education, Educational Attainment, Disadvantaged, Admission Criteria, College Applicants, Scores |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | ACT Assessment, SAT (College Admission Test) |
| Abstract: | The SAT and ACT have held a controversial place in American education for generations. The conventional wisdom has come to suggest that these college entrance tests are harmful to educational equity because they discriminate against students from low-income families and other students whose backgrounds may put them at a disadvantage, such as Black, Hispanic, or Native American students. This brief challenges the notion that college admissions exams are at the heart of inequities observed in college admissions, higher education attainment, and broader social disparities. More specifically, the brief addresses five ideas that have become conventional wisdom in some quarters: "College admissions exams are racist," "College admissions exams limit students' pathways into quality higher education," "Other parts of college application packets promote equity better than entrance exams," "Admissions officers should just focus on grades," and "The future of college admissions is 'test optional.'" |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | ED628976 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED628976 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED628976 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Think Again: 'College Admissions Exams Drive Higher Education Inequities' – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tyner%2C+Adam%22">Tyner, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22">Thomas B. Fordham Institute</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Foundation%22">Thomas B. Fordham Foundation</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Thomas+B%2E+Fordham+Institute%22"><i>Thomas B. Fordham Institute</i></searchLink>. 2023. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: thegadfly@fordhaminstitute.org; Web site: https://fordhaminstitute.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Students%22">Minority Group Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Admission%22">College Admission</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Entrance+Examinations%22">College Entrance Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Attainment%22">Educational Attainment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disadvantaged%22">Disadvantaged</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Admission+Criteria%22">Admission Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Applicants%22">College Applicants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22ACT+Assessment%22">ACT Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22SAT+%28College+Admission+Test%29%22">SAT (College Admission Test)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The SAT and ACT have held a controversial place in American education for generations. The conventional wisdom has come to suggest that these college entrance tests are harmful to educational equity because they discriminate against students from low-income families and other students whose backgrounds may put them at a disadvantage, such as Black, Hispanic, or Native American students. This brief challenges the notion that college admissions exams are at the heart of inequities observed in college admissions, higher education attainment, and broader social disparities. More specifically, the brief addresses five ideas that have become conventional wisdom in some quarters: "College admissions exams are racist," "College admissions exams limit students' pathways into quality higher education," "Other parts of college application packets promote equity better than entrance exams," "Admissions officers should just focus on grades," and "The future of college admissions is 'test optional.'" – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED628976 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED628976 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Barriers Type: general – SubjectFull: Equal Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Group Students Type: general – SubjectFull: College Admission Type: general – SubjectFull: College Entrance Examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Attainment Type: general – SubjectFull: Disadvantaged Type: general – SubjectFull: Admission Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: College Applicants Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: ACT Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: SAT (College Admission Test) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Think Again: 'College Admissions Exams Drive Higher Education Inequities' Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tyner, Adam IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2023 Titles: – TitleFull: Thomas B. Fordham Institute Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |