Multitask Summary Scoring with Longformers
Saved in:
| Title: | Multitask Summary Scoring with Longformers |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai, Dascalu, Mihai, Allen, Laura K., Crossley, Scott Andrew, McNamara, Danielle S. |
| Source: | Grantee Submission. 2022Paper presented at International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (2022). |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) Office of Naval Research (ONR) (DOD) |
| Contract Number: | R305A180144 R305A180261 N000141712300 N000142012623 N000141912424 N000142012627 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | Automation, Scoring, Documentation, Likert Scales, Artificial Intelligence, Task Analysis, Natural Language Processing, Learning Processes, Regression (Statistics), Error Patterns, Models, Prediction |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_79 |
| Abstract: | Automated scoring of student language is a complex task that requires systems to emulate complex and multi-faceted human evaluation criteria. Summary scoring brings an additional layer of complexity to automated scoring because it involves two texts of differing lengths that must be compared. In this study, we present our approach to automate summary scoring by evaluating a corpus of approximately 5,000 summaries based on 103 source texts, each summary being scored on a 4-point Likert scale for seven different evaluation criteria. We train and evaluate a series of Machine Learning models that use a combination of independent textual complexity indices from the ReaderBench framework and Deep Learning models based on the Transformer architecture in a multitask setup to predict concurrently all criteria. Our models achieve significantly lower errors than previous work using a similar dataset, with MAE ranging from 0.10-0.16 and corresponding R[superscript 2] values of up to 0.64. Our findings indicate that Longformer-based models are adequate for contextualizing longer text sequences and effectively scoring summaries according to a variety of human-defined evaluation criteria using a single Neural Network. [This paper was published in: "AIED 2022, LNCS 13355," edited by M. M. Rodrigo et al., Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 756-761.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | ED629735 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED629735 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED629735 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Multitask Summary Scoring with Longformers – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Botarleanu%2C+Robert-Mihai%22">Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dascalu%2C+Mihai%22">Dascalu, Mihai</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Allen%2C+Laura+K%2E%22">Allen, Laura K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crossley%2C+Scott+Andrew%22">Crossley, Scott Andrew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McNamara%2C+Danielle+S%2E%22">McNamara, Danielle S.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2022Paper presented at International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) (2022). – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)<br />Office of Naval Research (ONR) (DOD) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R305A180144<br />R305A180261<br />N000141712300<br />N000142012623<br />N000141912424<br />N000142012627 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Automation%22">Automation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring%22">Scoring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Likert+Scales%22">Likert Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+Language+Processing%22">Natural Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+%28Statistics%29%22">Regression (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Patterns%22">Error Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prediction%22">Prediction</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_79 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Automated scoring of student language is a complex task that requires systems to emulate complex and multi-faceted human evaluation criteria. Summary scoring brings an additional layer of complexity to automated scoring because it involves two texts of differing lengths that must be compared. In this study, we present our approach to automate summary scoring by evaluating a corpus of approximately 5,000 summaries based on 103 source texts, each summary being scored on a 4-point Likert scale for seven different evaluation criteria. We train and evaluate a series of Machine Learning models that use a combination of independent textual complexity indices from the ReaderBench framework and Deep Learning models based on the Transformer architecture in a multitask setup to predict concurrently all criteria. Our models achieve significantly lower errors than previous work using a similar dataset, with MAE ranging from 0.10-0.16 and corresponding R[superscript 2] values of up to 0.64. Our findings indicate that Longformer-based models are adequate for contextualizing longer text sequences and effectively scoring summaries according to a variety of human-defined evaluation criteria using a single Neural Network. [This paper was published in: "AIED 2022, LNCS 13355," edited by M. M. Rodrigo et al., Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 756-761.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED629735 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED629735 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_79 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Automation Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Type: general – SubjectFull: Documentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Likert Scales Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural Language Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Prediction Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Multitask Summary Scoring with Longformers Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dascalu, Mihai – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Allen, Laura K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Crossley, Scott Andrew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McNamara, Danielle S. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2022 Titles: – TitleFull: Grantee Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |