Evaluating a Web-Based System for Tracking Public Health Practice Experiences: User Perceptions, Challenges, and Recommendations for Technology Improvement
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating a Web-Based System for Tracking Public Health Practice Experiences: User Perceptions, Challenges, and Recommendations for Technology Improvement |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Matthew McGrievy |
| Source: | ProQuest LLC. 2024Ed.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina. |
| Availability: | ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 194 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Faculty, College Students, Public Health, Health Education, Computer Uses in Education, Data Processing, Data Collection, Student Evaluation, Computer Software Evaluation, Student Attitudes, Usability, Accreditation (Institutions), Technology Planning |
| ISBN: | 979-83-8368-106-0 |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this descriptive research study was to evaluate the web-based practice experience tracking system at a school of public health (SPH) at a large southeastern university. Applied practice experiences (APEs) are a key component of public health education, and schools and programs of public health in the United States must provide documentation of APEs and practice-related activities to meet accreditation standards. A descriptive research evaluation examined how users perceive and use the existing web-based system designed to document APEs in the SPH. Research questions investigated what factors influence the use of the existing system, identified challenges users face when using the system, and focused on recommendations for improvement in tracking practice-based experiences using the web-based system. The research design is a case study that uses a convergent mixed methods approach where qualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously from students, faculty, and practitioner partners of the SPH. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather qualitative data from 8 participants and a survey was used to gather quantitative data from 82 respondents. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the User Burden Scale (UBS) served as the theoretical basis for the semi-structured interviews and the survey. Quantitative and qualitative results indicated overall positive perceptions toward constructs related to perceived usefulness, ease-of-use, social influence, and user burden. Overall attitude toward the system was rated most negatively by participants. Research findings can serve as a guide for other schools and programs who are required to document and report on practice-based learning to meet accreditation requirements. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Access URL: | https://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:30992739 |
| Accession Number: | ED659253 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED659253 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Dissertation/ Thesis PubTypeId: dissertation PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating a Web-Based System for Tracking Public Health Practice Experiences: User Perceptions, Challenges, and Recommendations for Technology Improvement – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Matthew+McGrievy%22">Matthew McGrievy</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22ProQuest+LLC%22"><i>ProQuest LLC</i></searchLink>. 2024Ed.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 194 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Health%22">Public Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Education%22">Health Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Processing%22">Data Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software+Evaluation%22">Computer Software Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Usability%22">Usability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accreditation+%28Institutions%29%22">Accreditation (Institutions)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Planning%22">Technology Planning</searchLink> – Name: ISBN Label: ISBN Group: ISBN Data: 979-83-8368-106-0 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of this descriptive research study was to evaluate the web-based practice experience tracking system at a school of public health (SPH) at a large southeastern university. Applied practice experiences (APEs) are a key component of public health education, and schools and programs of public health in the United States must provide documentation of APEs and practice-related activities to meet accreditation standards. A descriptive research evaluation examined how users perceive and use the existing web-based system designed to document APEs in the SPH. Research questions investigated what factors influence the use of the existing system, identified challenges users face when using the system, and focused on recommendations for improvement in tracking practice-based experiences using the web-based system. The research design is a case study that uses a convergent mixed methods approach where qualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously from students, faculty, and practitioner partners of the SPH. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather qualitative data from 8 participants and a survey was used to gather quantitative data from 82 respondents. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the User Burden Scale (UBS) served as the theoretical basis for the semi-structured interviews and the survey. Quantitative and qualitative results indicated overall positive perceptions toward constructs related to perceived usefulness, ease-of-use, social influence, and user burden. Overall attitude toward the system was rated most negatively by participants. Research findings can serve as a guide for other schools and programs who are required to document and report on practice-based learning to meet accreditation requirements. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:30992739" linkWindow="_blank">https://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:30992739</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED659253 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED659253 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 194 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Health Type: general – SubjectFull: Health Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Collection Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Usability Type: general – SubjectFull: Accreditation (Institutions) Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Planning Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating a Web-Based System for Tracking Public Health Practice Experiences: User Perceptions, Challenges, and Recommendations for Technology Improvement Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Matthew McGrievy IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: isbn-print Value: 979-83-8368-106-0 Titles: – TitleFull: ProQuest LLC Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |