Designing and Evaluating Innovative State Assessment Programs: A Framework for State Education Agencies
Saved in:
| Title: | Designing and Evaluating Innovative State Assessment Programs: A Framework for State Education Agencies |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | W. Christopher Brandt, Nathan Dadey, Carla Evans, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA) |
| Source: | National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. 2024. |
| Availability: | National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 36 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Intended Audience: | Policymakers |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Standardized Tests, Achievement Tests, Educational Testing, State Standards, Student Evaluation, Test Construction, Educational Innovation, Testing Programs, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, State Legislation |
| Abstract: | Recent years have produced a surge in interest in improving state assessment programs. Many states are designing new assessments. Much of this innovation is aimed at addressing longstanding areas of unhappiness with typical domain-sampled, end-of-year state assessments: States want to streamline assessment activities, enhance the instructional utility of assessment results, and improve assessment experiences for students. Designing and redesigning state assessment to meet these goals often involves working quickly to meet legislated timelines or legislative turnover. And working quickly often means that good practices--particularly those related to iterative design and program evaluation--can be overlooked. Without a systematic and robust process of designing and evaluating these programs, educators and policymakers risk losing critical insights into what works well, what's going wrong, and why. This paper presents a framework that state education leaders can use to design and evaluate an innovative assessment program. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | ED660539 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED660539 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED660539 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Designing and Evaluating Innovative State Assessment Programs: A Framework for State Education Agencies – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22W%2E+Christopher+Brandt%22">W. Christopher Brandt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nathan+Dadey%22">Nathan Dadey</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carla+Evans%22">Carla Evans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%2C+Inc%2E+%28NCIEA%29%22">National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%22"><i>National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment</i></searchLink>. 2024. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 36 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Policymakers – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standardized+Tests%22">Standardized Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Tests%22">Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Testing%22">Educational Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Standards%22">State Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Construction%22">Test Construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Innovation%22">Educational Innovation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Programs%22">Testing Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Legislation%22">State Legislation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Recent years have produced a surge in interest in improving state assessment programs. Many states are designing new assessments. Much of this innovation is aimed at addressing longstanding areas of unhappiness with typical domain-sampled, end-of-year state assessments: States want to streamline assessment activities, enhance the instructional utility of assessment results, and improve assessment experiences for students. Designing and redesigning state assessment to meet these goals often involves working quickly to meet legislated timelines or legislative turnover. And working quickly often means that good practices--particularly those related to iterative design and program evaluation--can be overlooked. Without a systematic and robust process of designing and evaluating these programs, educators and policymakers risk losing critical insights into what works well, what's going wrong, and why. This paper presents a framework that state education leaders can use to design and evaluate an innovative assessment program. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED660539 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED660539 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 36 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Standardized Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: State Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Construction Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Innovation Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: State Legislation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Designing and Evaluating Innovative State Assessment Programs: A Framework for State Education Agencies Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: W. Christopher Brandt – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nathan Dadey – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Carla Evans IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2024 Titles: – TitleFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |