View in EDS

Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education. Final Report

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education. Final Report
Language: English
Authors: Kri Burkander, Shafiqua Little, Mycaeri Atkinson, Research for Action (RFA)
Source: Research for Action. 2024.
Availability: Research for Action. 100 South Broad Street Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Tel: 215-823-2500; Fax: 215-823-2510; e-mail: info@researchforaction.org; Web site: http://www.researchforaction.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Intended Audience: Policymakers
Document Type: Reports - Research-practitioner Partnerships
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Higher Education, Educational Equity (Finance), Equal Education, Funding Formulas, Paying for College, Equalization Aid, State Aid, Access to Education, Educational Discrimination, Educational Policy, Administrators, Minority Serving Institutions, Black Colleges, Noninstructional Student Costs
Geographic Terms: Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina
Abstract: As states reckon with racial enrollment and attainment gaps in higher education, some have made efforts to address them through their higher education funding. Two common approaches are outcomes-based funding (OBF) and Promise programs, as each can be designed with an explicit race equity lens. This report summarizes a two-year study examining the degree to which these race-specific state funding policies have advanced racial equity in higher education. Exploring initiatives in Minnesota, New Jersey, and North Carolina, this study examines how these policies aim to dismantle racial inequities by directing resources toward Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students and the institutions that serve them. This study draws on 25 interviews with state policymakers and institutional leaders at a purposive sample of public four-year institutions. Researchers sought the perspectives of individuals at Minority-serving Institutions (MSIs), Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Native American-serving non-tribal institutions (NASNTIs), and Hispanic-serving Institutions (HSIs), but also selected one Predominantly White Institution (PWI) in OBF states to understand how, if at all, the funding model incentivized institutional change. The research suggests that while policymakers express concerns that the amount of funding tied to race equity metrics is insufficient to motivate change, institutional leaders perceive that the metrics have steered funds toward under-resourced students and the institutions serving them. However, the report highlights that without addressing historical underfunding of MSIs and HBCUs, these institutions cannot compete equitably for funds under zero-sum OBF models. The report also suggests that the design of the formula, unfunded mandates, and competing state initiatives can undermine the impact of a race-explicit OBF. Race-explicit Promise programs in this study were perceived to have bolstered enrollment and retention at participating MSIs. However, because programs were designed to cover only tuition and fees, respondents suggested that they were not providing an additional benefit beyond existing federal and state aid programs. Without covering the additional costs of college, including room and board, these programs fell short of making a four-year residential college experience accessible to students for whom they were designed. The recommendations emerging from the research urge policymakers to consider the full ecosystem of postsecondary institutions when designing funding initiatives, ensuring that funding programs are additive rather than overlapping to maximize outcomes. The report also emphasizes the importance of supporting additional costs of college in Promise programs to promote equity for students experiencing systemic barriers.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: ED660634
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED660634
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED660634
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education. Final Report
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kri+Burkander%22">Kri Burkander</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shafiqua+Little%22">Shafiqua Little</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mycaeri+Atkinson%22">Mycaeri Atkinson</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Research+for+Action+%28RFA%29%22">Research for Action (RFA)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+for+Action%22"><i>Research for Action</i></searchLink>. 2024.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Research for Action. 100 South Broad Street Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Tel: 215-823-2500; Fax: 215-823-2510; e-mail: info@researchforaction.org; Web site: http://www.researchforaction.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
– Name: Audience
  Label: Intended Audience
  Group: Audnce
  Data: Policymakers
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research-practitioner Partnerships<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Equity+%28Finance%29%22">Educational Equity (Finance)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Funding+Formulas%22">Funding Formulas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Paying+for+College%22">Paying for College</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equalization+Aid%22">Equalization Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Aid%22">State Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+Education%22">Access to Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Discrimination%22">Educational Discrimination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrators%22">Administrators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Serving+Institutions%22">Minority Serving Institutions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Black+Colleges%22">Black Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Noninstructional+Student+Costs%22">Noninstructional Student Costs</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minnesota%22">Minnesota</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+Jersey%22">New Jersey</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22North+Carolina%22">North Carolina</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: As states reckon with racial enrollment and attainment gaps in higher education, some have made efforts to address them through their higher education funding. Two common approaches are outcomes-based funding (OBF) and Promise programs, as each can be designed with an explicit race equity lens. This report summarizes a two-year study examining the degree to which these race-specific state funding policies have advanced racial equity in higher education. Exploring initiatives in Minnesota, New Jersey, and North Carolina, this study examines how these policies aim to dismantle racial inequities by directing resources toward Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students and the institutions that serve them. This study draws on 25 interviews with state policymakers and institutional leaders at a purposive sample of public four-year institutions. Researchers sought the perspectives of individuals at Minority-serving Institutions (MSIs), Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Native American-serving non-tribal institutions (NASNTIs), and Hispanic-serving Institutions (HSIs), but also selected one Predominantly White Institution (PWI) in OBF states to understand how, if at all, the funding model incentivized institutional change. The research suggests that while policymakers express concerns that the amount of funding tied to race equity metrics is insufficient to motivate change, institutional leaders perceive that the metrics have steered funds toward under-resourced students and the institutions serving them. However, the report highlights that without addressing historical underfunding of MSIs and HBCUs, these institutions cannot compete equitably for funds under zero-sum OBF models. The report also suggests that the design of the formula, unfunded mandates, and competing state initiatives can undermine the impact of a race-explicit OBF. Race-explicit Promise programs in this study were perceived to have bolstered enrollment and retention at participating MSIs. However, because programs were designed to cover only tuition and fees, respondents suggested that they were not providing an additional benefit beyond existing federal and state aid programs. Without covering the additional costs of college, including room and board, these programs fell short of making a four-year residential college experience accessible to students for whom they were designed. The recommendations emerging from the research urge policymakers to consider the full ecosystem of postsecondary institutions when designing funding initiatives, ensuring that funding programs are additive rather than overlapping to maximize outcomes. The report also emphasizes the importance of supporting additional costs of college in Promise programs to promote equity for students experiencing systemic barriers.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED660634
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED660634
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Equity (Finance)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Equal Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Funding Formulas
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Paying for College
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Equalization Aid
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Aid
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Access to Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Discrimination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Administrators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minority Serving Institutions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Black Colleges
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Noninstructional Student Costs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minnesota
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: New Jersey
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: North Carolina
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Examining the Effectiveness of Race-Specific Funding Strategies in Higher Education. Final Report
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Research for Action (RFA)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kri Burkander
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shafiqua Little
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mycaeri Atkinson
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Research for Action
              Type: main
ResultId 1