Experimental Effects of 'Opportunity Gap' and 'Achievement Gap' Frames. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1098
Saved in:
| Title: | Experimental Effects of 'Opportunity Gap' and 'Achievement Gap' Frames. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1098 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | David M. Quinn, Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University |
| Source: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. 2024. |
| Availability: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 77 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Spencer Foundation |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Equal Education, Achievement Gap, Racial Differences, Social Justice, African American Students, White Students, Stereotypes, Outcomes of Education, Adults, Political Attitudes, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences, Attitudes |
| Abstract: | Racial equity in education is often framed around "closing the achievement gap," but many scholars argue this frame perpetuates deficit mindsets. The "opportunity gap" (OG) frame has been offered as an alternative to focus attention on structural injustices. In a preregistered survey experiment, I estimate the effects of framing racial equity in education around "achievement gaps" (AGs) vs OGs. I find US adult respondents on MTurk gave higher priority to "closing the racial opportunity gap" versus "closing the racial achievement gap" (ES = 0.11 SD). When randomly assigned to read an OG frame before being asked to explain the Black/White "achievement gap," respondents were less likely to endorse cultural or individual-level explanations, compared with respondents only shown AG statistics (ES = -0.10 SD). I find no evidence the OG frame affected respondents' racial stereotypes or policy preferences. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED665407 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED665407 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED665407 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Experimental Effects of 'Opportunity Gap' and 'Achievement Gap' Frames. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1098 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+M%2E+Quinn%22">David M. Quinn</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Annenberg+Institute+for+School+Reform+at+Brown+University%22">Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Annenberg+Institute+for+School+Reform+at+Brown+University%22"><i>Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University</i></searchLink>. 2024. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 77 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Spencer Foundation – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Gap%22">Achievement Gap</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Differences%22">Racial Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Justice%22">Social Justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22African+American+Students%22">African American Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22White+Students%22">White Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stereotypes%22">Stereotypes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+Attitudes%22">Political Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Characteristics%22">Individual Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Differences%22">Individual Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes%22">Attitudes</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Racial equity in education is often framed around "closing the achievement gap," but many scholars argue this frame perpetuates deficit mindsets. The "opportunity gap" (OG) frame has been offered as an alternative to focus attention on structural injustices. In a preregistered survey experiment, I estimate the effects of framing racial equity in education around "achievement gaps" (AGs) vs OGs. I find US adult respondents on MTurk gave higher priority to "closing the racial opportunity gap" versus "closing the racial achievement gap" (ES = 0.11 SD). When randomly assigned to read an OG frame before being asked to explain the Black/White "achievement gap," respondents were less likely to endorse cultural or individual-level explanations, compared with respondents only shown AG statistics (ES = -0.10 SD). I find no evidence the OG frame affected respondents' racial stereotypes or policy preferences. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED665407 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED665407 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 77 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Equal Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Gap Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Justice Type: general – SubjectFull: African American Students Type: general – SubjectFull: White Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Stereotypes Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Political Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Experimental Effects of 'Opportunity Gap' and 'Achievement Gap' Frames. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1098 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David M. Quinn IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Type: published Y: 2024 Titles: – TitleFull: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |