Average and Heterogeneous Effects of Political Party on Education Finance and Outcomes: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from U.S. States across Election Cycles. EdWorkingPaper No. 20-280
Saved in:
| Title: | Average and Heterogeneous Effects of Political Party on Education Finance and Outcomes: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from U.S. States across Election Cycles. EdWorkingPaper No. 20-280 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mark J. Chin, Lena Shi, Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University |
| Source: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. 2023. |
| Availability: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 49 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) Spencer Foundation |
| Contract Number: | R305B150010 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Political Affiliation, Educational Finance, Outcomes of Education, Politics of Education, State Officials, Elections, Politics, State Government, Expenditures, Political Campaigns, Differences, Educational Trends, Trend Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Class Size, Small Classes, Graduation Rate, College Enrollment, Enrollment Rate, Context Effect |
| Abstract: | In the U.S., state politicians directly influence legislation and budget decisions that can substantially affect public education spending and students. Does the political party of elected officials matter for these outcomes? We use a regression discontinuity design to analyze close house and gubernatorial elections from 1982 to 2016 and find that the impact of Democratic control of state government depends on whether elections occur during a presidential election year. On average, Democratic states spend less per capita on K-12 education. This trend, however, reverses when Democrats secure marginal control during off-cycle elections. Outside of presidential election years, we find increased state expenditures on both K-12 education and higher education. These increases coincided with smaller K-12 class sizes, relatively higher high school diploma rates, and expanded college enrollment. Our results highlight the importance of considering how federal political contexts influence the effects of state-level politics on education finance and outcomes. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED671428 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | In the U.S., state politicians directly influence legislation and budget decisions that can substantially affect public education spending and students. Does the political party of elected officials matter for these outcomes? We use a regression discontinuity design to analyze close house and gubernatorial elections from 1982 to 2016 and find that the impact of Democratic control of state government depends on whether elections occur during a presidential election year. On average, Democratic states spend less per capita on K-12 education. This trend, however, reverses when Democrats secure marginal control during off-cycle elections. Outside of presidential election years, we find increased state expenditures on both K-12 education and higher education. These increases coincided with smaller K-12 class sizes, relatively higher high school diploma rates, and expanded college enrollment. Our results highlight the importance of considering how federal political contexts influence the effects of state-level politics on education finance and outcomes. |
|---|
