How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values
Saved in:
| Title: | How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Scott Marion, Chris Domaleski, Will Lorié, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA) |
| Source: | National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. 2025. |
| Availability: | National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 9 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Federal Legislation, Accountability, Educational Indicators, Federal State Relationship, Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, Academic Achievement, Measurement, Growth Models, State School District Relationship, State Policy, Needs Assessment |
| Abstract: | Federal law requires that state accountability systems include "another academic indicator" for elementary and middle schools in addition to academic achievement. Nearly all states use a measure of student longitudinal growth as their other academic indicator. But how should states decide which growth model to use? The Center for Assessment has helped several states choose or revise their growth models, and we find that these decisions involve much more than technical factors. From a strictly technical perspective, there isn't a "right" or "wrong" approach. To choose the right approach for their states, education leaders should consider their policy priorities, the intended uses of the growth results, any anticipated implementation challenges and, yes, technical factors. These things can be difficult to reconcile. This short paper suggests that states and districts use a principled approach to establish their most important values and walks leaders through key questions to ask. This process will help them evaluate potential growth models against an agreed-upon set of criteria. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED671646 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED671646 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED671646 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott+Marion%22">Scott Marion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chris+Domaleski%22">Chris Domaleski</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Will+Lorié%22">Will Lorié</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%2C+Inc%2E+%28NCIEA%29%22">National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%22"><i>National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 9 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Indicators%22">Educational Indicators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+State+Relationship%22">Federal State Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Schools%22">Elementary Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement%22">Measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Growth+Models%22">Growth Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+School+District+Relationship%22">State School District Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Policy%22">State Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Needs+Assessment%22">Needs Assessment</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Federal law requires that state accountability systems include "another academic indicator" for elementary and middle schools in addition to academic achievement. Nearly all states use a measure of student longitudinal growth as their other academic indicator. But how should states decide which growth model to use? The Center for Assessment has helped several states choose or revise their growth models, and we find that these decisions involve much more than technical factors. From a strictly technical perspective, there isn't a "right" or "wrong" approach. To choose the right approach for their states, education leaders should consider their policy priorities, the intended uses of the growth results, any anticipated implementation challenges and, yes, technical factors. These things can be difficult to reconcile. This short paper suggests that states and districts use a principled approach to establish their most important values and walks leaders through key questions to ask. This process will help them evaluate potential growth models against an agreed-upon set of criteria. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED671646 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED671646 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Indicators Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal State Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Type: general – SubjectFull: Growth Models Type: general – SubjectFull: State School District Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: State Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Needs Assessment Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Scott Marion – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chris Domaleski – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Will Lorié IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |