How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values
Language: English
Authors: Scott Marion, Chris Domaleski, Will Lorié, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA)
Source: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. 2025.
Availability: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Elementary Education
Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Accountability, Educational Indicators, Federal State Relationship, Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, Academic Achievement, Measurement, Growth Models, State School District Relationship, State Policy, Needs Assessment
Abstract: Federal law requires that state accountability systems include "another academic indicator" for elementary and middle schools in addition to academic achievement. Nearly all states use a measure of student longitudinal growth as their other academic indicator. But how should states decide which growth model to use? The Center for Assessment has helped several states choose or revise their growth models, and we find that these decisions involve much more than technical factors. From a strictly technical perspective, there isn't a "right" or "wrong" approach. To choose the right approach for their states, education leaders should consider their policy priorities, the intended uses of the growth results, any anticipated implementation challenges and, yes, technical factors. These things can be difficult to reconcile. This short paper suggests that states and districts use a principled approach to establish their most important values and walks leaders through key questions to ask. This process will help them evaluate potential growth models against an agreed-upon set of criteria.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED671646
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED671646
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED671646
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott+Marion%22">Scott Marion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chris+Domaleski%22">Chris Domaleski</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Will+Lorié%22">Will Lorié</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%2C+Inc%2E+%28NCIEA%29%22">National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Center+for+the+Improvement+of+Educational+Assessment%22"><i>National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment</i></searchLink>. 2025.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. P.O. Box 351, Dover, NH 03821. Tel: 603-516-7900; Fax: 603-516-7910; e-mail: recep@nciea.org; Web site: http://www.nciea.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 9
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Indicators%22">Educational Indicators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+State+Relationship%22">Federal State Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Schools%22">Elementary Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement%22">Measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Growth+Models%22">Growth Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+School+District+Relationship%22">State School District Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Policy%22">State Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Needs+Assessment%22">Needs Assessment</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Federal law requires that state accountability systems include "another academic indicator" for elementary and middle schools in addition to academic achievement. Nearly all states use a measure of student longitudinal growth as their other academic indicator. But how should states decide which growth model to use? The Center for Assessment has helped several states choose or revise their growth models, and we find that these decisions involve much more than technical factors. From a strictly technical perspective, there isn't a "right" or "wrong" approach. To choose the right approach for their states, education leaders should consider their policy priorities, the intended uses of the growth results, any anticipated implementation challenges and, yes, technical factors. These things can be difficult to reconcile. This short paper suggests that states and districts use a principled approach to establish their most important values and walks leaders through key questions to ask. This process will help them evaluate potential growth models against an agreed-upon set of criteria.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED671646
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED671646
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accountability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Indicators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal State Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Middle Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Measurement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Growth Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State School District Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Needs Assessment
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: How Should States Choose a Growth Model? Aligning Your Growth Model with Policy and Technical Values
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (NCIEA)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scott Marion
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chris Domaleski
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Will Lorié
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment
              Type: main
ResultId 1