How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement
Saved in:
| Title: | How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Rachel Williams Newman |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2025Ed.D. Scholarly Research Project, Bradley University. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 95 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education Adult Education |
| Descriptors: | Surgery, Graduate Medical Education, Cognitive Style, Distance Education, Blended Learning, Experiential Learning, Conferences (Gatherings), Student Attitudes, Videoconferencing, Peer Relationship, Course Content, Accuracy, Age Differences, Measures (Individuals), Educational Change, COVID-19, Pandemics, Learning Theories, Well Being, Medical Students, Educational History, Andragogy |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Learning Style Inventory |
| Abstract: | Surgical resident learning style preferences in the wake of the rapid, widespread adoption of online learning technology during and following the COVID-19 pandemic is not widely studied. This study investigated learning style preferences of surgical residents in the context of engagement in a hybrid national scientific conference. Thirty-five surgical residents completed the Kolb Experiential Learning Profile (KELP) prior to attending the conference. Afterward, 26 completed a mixed methods survey. Login data were reviewed for online activity for all participants. Ninety-six percent of participants attended the conference in person and zero attended virtually only. Residents indicated focused time for learning and engaging with colleagues were most beneficial to their learning. Eighty-four percent were satisfied with the educational content provided. Results showed that 23% had an Acting learning style followed by Deciding at 20% and Balancing at 14%. Seventy-seven percent thought their KELP results were accurate and largely reinforced their existing learning approaches. Sixty-nine percent thought it would be helpful in their training while 84% thought it would be helpful in future professional development. Fifty-six percent planned to engage online, however only 7.7% did so, indicating the self-identified barrier of time prevented online engagement in education. Despite the small sample size, relationships between learning style and age and self-reported program size approached significance. Dedicated in-person learning is still effective and worthwhile for these learners. Experiential learning approaches may make in-person learning more impactful and microlearning may increase online engagement. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED672420 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED672420 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED672420 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rachel+Williams+Newman%22">Rachel Williams Newman</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Online+Submission%22"><i>Online Submission</i></searchLink>. 2025Ed.D. Scholarly Research Project, Bradley University. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 95 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Adult+Education%22">Adult Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surgery%22">Surgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Medical+Education%22">Graduate Medical Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Style%22">Cognitive Style</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiential+Learning%22">Experiential Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conferences+%28Gatherings%29%22">Conferences (Gatherings)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Videoconferencing%22">Videoconferencing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Relationship%22">Peer Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Content%22">Course Content</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+Differences%22">Age Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measures+%28Individuals%29%22">Measures (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19%22">COVID-19</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pandemics%22">Pandemics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Theories%22">Learning Theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+Students%22">Medical Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Andragogy%22">Andragogy</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Learning+Style+Inventory%22">Learning Style Inventory</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Surgical resident learning style preferences in the wake of the rapid, widespread adoption of online learning technology during and following the COVID-19 pandemic is not widely studied. This study investigated learning style preferences of surgical residents in the context of engagement in a hybrid national scientific conference. Thirty-five surgical residents completed the Kolb Experiential Learning Profile (KELP) prior to attending the conference. Afterward, 26 completed a mixed methods survey. Login data were reviewed for online activity for all participants. Ninety-six percent of participants attended the conference in person and zero attended virtually only. Residents indicated focused time for learning and engaging with colleagues were most beneficial to their learning. Eighty-four percent were satisfied with the educational content provided. Results showed that 23% had an Acting learning style followed by Deciding at 20% and Balancing at 14%. Seventy-seven percent thought their KELP results were accurate and largely reinforced their existing learning approaches. Sixty-nine percent thought it would be helpful in their training while 84% thought it would be helpful in future professional development. Fifty-six percent planned to engage online, however only 7.7% did so, indicating the self-identified barrier of time prevented online engagement in education. Despite the small sample size, relationships between learning style and age and self-reported program size approached significance. Dedicated in-person learning is still effective and worthwhile for these learners. Experiential learning approaches may make in-person learning more impactful and microlearning may increase online engagement. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED672420 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED672420 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 95 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Surgery Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Medical Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Style Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Blended Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Experiential Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Conferences (Gatherings) Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Videoconferencing Type: general – SubjectFull: Peer Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Course Content Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Age Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Measures (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: COVID-19 Type: general – SubjectFull: Pandemics Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Theories Type: general – SubjectFull: Well Being Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational History Type: general – SubjectFull: Andragogy Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Style Inventory Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rachel Williams Newman IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Online Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |