View in EDS

Who's Afraid of School Choice? Examining the Intensity of Anti-School Choice Rhetoric. Second Edition

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Who's Afraid of School Choice? Examining the Intensity of Anti-School Choice Rhetoric. Second Edition
Language: English
Authors: Jason Bedrick, Ed Tarnowski, EdChoice
Source: EdChoice. 2025.
Availability: EdChoice. 111 Monument Circle Suite 2650, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Tel: 317-681-0745; e-mail: info@edchoice.org; Web site: http://www.edchoice.org
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: School Choice, Educational Policy, Barriers, Educational Legislation, Public Schools, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Finance, Rhetoric, State Policy, Educational Vouchers, Public Opinion, Private Schools, Tax Credits
Geographic Terms: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah
Abstract: Opponents of education choice recycle the same false prophesies of doom without regard to the evidence or the size and scope of the proposals. For decades, the most common objection to education choice policies has been that they will "destroy public education." According to the critics, choice policies will induce the parents most interested in education to leave the district school system, leading to significant financial losses and declining academic performance. These predictions of financial and academic disaster have not materialized, however. In states with the oldest and largest education choice programs, inflation-adjusted per-pupil funding has increased, and the average performance of district schools is at least as good as it was when the choice policies were first enacted. Indeed, the overwhelming conclusion of the research literature is that education choice policies have modest but statistically significant positive effects on district school performance. The first iteration of this report explored whether the intensity of choice opponents' rhetoric varied based on the size and scope of the choice proposal at hand. After analyzing the rhetoric during debates over the education choice legislation enacted in five states in 2021, the authors concluded that choice opponents' pessimistic predictions did not vary in intensity based on the size or scope of the proposal. Whether the proposals were modest or expansive, the rhetorical intensity of school choice opponents was about the same. This follow-up report extends that analysis by analyzing the rhetoric used during debates over the education choice legislation enacted in eight states--Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah--in 2023 and 2024. The authors again conclude that choice opponents' rhetorical intensity did not vary based on the size or scope of the proposal.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED672454
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED672454
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED672454
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Who's Afraid of School Choice? Examining the Intensity of Anti-School Choice Rhetoric. Second Edition
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jason+Bedrick%22">Jason Bedrick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ed+Tarnowski%22">Ed Tarnowski</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22EdChoice%22">EdChoice</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22EdChoice%22"><i>EdChoice</i></searchLink>. 2025.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: EdChoice. 111 Monument Circle Suite 2650, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Tel: 317-681-0745; e-mail: info@edchoice.org; Web site: http://www.edchoice.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Choice%22">School Choice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Legislation%22">Educational Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rhetoric%22">Rhetoric</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Policy%22">State Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Vouchers%22">Educational Vouchers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Opinion%22">Public Opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Private+Schools%22">Private Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tax+Credits%22">Tax Credits</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alabama%22">Alabama</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Arkansas%22">Arkansas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Iowa%22">Iowa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Louisiana%22">Louisiana</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nebraska%22">Nebraska</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oklahoma%22">Oklahoma</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Carolina%22">South Carolina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Utah%22">Utah</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Opponents of education choice recycle the same false prophesies of doom without regard to the evidence or the size and scope of the proposals. For decades, the most common objection to education choice policies has been that they will "destroy public education." According to the critics, choice policies will induce the parents most interested in education to leave the district school system, leading to significant financial losses and declining academic performance. These predictions of financial and academic disaster have not materialized, however. In states with the oldest and largest education choice programs, inflation-adjusted per-pupil funding has increased, and the average performance of district schools is at least as good as it was when the choice policies were first enacted. Indeed, the overwhelming conclusion of the research literature is that education choice policies have modest but statistically significant positive effects on district school performance. The first iteration of this report explored whether the intensity of choice opponents' rhetoric varied based on the size and scope of the choice proposal at hand. After analyzing the rhetoric during debates over the education choice legislation enacted in five states in 2021, the authors concluded that choice opponents' pessimistic predictions did not vary in intensity based on the size or scope of the proposal. Whether the proposals were modest or expansive, the rhetorical intensity of school choice opponents was about the same. This follow-up report extends that analysis by analyzing the rhetoric used during debates over the education choice legislation enacted in eight states--Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah--in 2023 and 2024. The authors again conclude that choice opponents' rhetorical intensity did not vary based on the size or scope of the proposal.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED672454
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED672454
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: School Choice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Barriers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Finance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rhetoric
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Vouchers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Opinion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Private Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tax Credits
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Alabama
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Arkansas
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Iowa
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Louisiana
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nebraska
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Oklahoma
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: South Carolina
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Utah
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Who's Afraid of School Choice? Examining the Intensity of Anti-School Choice Rhetoric. Second Edition
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: EdChoice
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jason Bedrick
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ed Tarnowski
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: EdChoice
              Type: main
ResultId 1