Quantifying Sensitivity to Selection on Unobserved Covariates: Recasting the Coefficient of Proportionality within a Correlational Framework
Saved in:
| Title: | Quantifying Sensitivity to Selection on Unobserved Covariates: Recasting the Coefficient of Proportionality within a Correlational Framework |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kenneth Frank (ORCID |
| Source: | Grantee Submission. 2025. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 80 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) |
| Contract Number: | R305D220022 |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Statistical Analysis, Correlation, Predictor Variables, Inferences |
| Abstract: | Sensitivity analyses can inform evidence-based education policy by quantifying the hypothetical conditions necessary to change an inference. Perhaps the most prevalent index used for sensitivity analyses is Oster's (2019) Coefficient of Proportionality (COP). Oster's COP leverages changes in estimated effects and R[superscript 2] when observed covariates are added to a model to quantify how strong selection on "unobserved covariates" would have to be relative to on "observed covariates" to nullify an estimated effect. In this paper, we reconceptualize the COP as a function of unobserved covariates' correlations with the focal predictor (e.g., treatment) and with the outcome. Our correlation-based approach addresses recent critiques of Oster's COP while preserving the comparison of selection on unobserved covariates to selection on observed covariates. As importantly, our expressions do not depend on an analyst's subjective choice of covariates to include in a baseline model, reproduce the exact results from Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates even in finite samples, can be adapted to a threshold for inference based on statistical significance, and can be directly calculated from conventionally reported quantities (e.g., estimated effect, standard error) through the Konfound packages in R or Stata. Thus, for most published studies in the social sciences our COP index can be easily applied and intuitively interpreted. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED674603 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED674603 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Quantifying Sensitivity to Selection on Unobserved Covariates: Recasting the Coefficient of Proportionality within a Correlational Framework – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kenneth+Frank%22">Kenneth Frank</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6116-5509">0000-0002-6116-5509</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Qinyun+Lin%22">Qinyun Lin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spiro+Maroulis%22">Spiro Maroulis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shimeng+Dai%2C+Contributor%22">Shimeng Dai, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nicole+Jess%2C+Contributor%22">Nicole Jess, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hung-Chang+Lin%2C+Contributor%22">Hung-Chang Lin, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yuqing+Liu%2C+Contributor%22">Yuqing Liu, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sarah+Maestrales%2C+Contributor%22">Sarah Maestrales, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ellen+Searle%2C+Contributor%22">Ellen Searle, Contributor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jordan+Tait%2C+Contributor%22">Jordan Tait, Contributor</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 80 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R305D220022 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferences%22">Inferences</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Sensitivity analyses can inform evidence-based education policy by quantifying the hypothetical conditions necessary to change an inference. Perhaps the most prevalent index used for sensitivity analyses is Oster's (2019) Coefficient of Proportionality (COP). Oster's COP leverages changes in estimated effects and R[superscript 2] when observed covariates are added to a model to quantify how strong selection on "unobserved covariates" would have to be relative to on "observed covariates" to nullify an estimated effect. In this paper, we reconceptualize the COP as a function of unobserved covariates' correlations with the focal predictor (e.g., treatment) and with the outcome. Our correlation-based approach addresses recent critiques of Oster's COP while preserving the comparison of selection on unobserved covariates to selection on observed covariates. As importantly, our expressions do not depend on an analyst's subjective choice of covariates to include in a baseline model, reproduce the exact results from Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates even in finite samples, can be adapted to a threshold for inference based on statistical significance, and can be directly calculated from conventionally reported quantities (e.g., estimated effect, standard error) through the Konfound packages in R or Stata. Thus, for most published studies in the social sciences our COP index can be easily applied and intuitively interpreted. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED674603 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED674603 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 80 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Inferences Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Quantifying Sensitivity to Selection on Unobserved Covariates: Recasting the Coefficient of Proportionality within a Correlational Framework Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kenneth Frank – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Qinyun Lin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Spiro Maroulis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shimeng Dai, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nicole Jess, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hung-Chang Lin, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yuqing Liu, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sarah Maestrales, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ellen Searle, Contributor – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jordan Tait, Contributor IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 06 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Grantee Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |