International College Ranking Systems: A Methodological Review. Final Report
Saved in:
| Title: | International College Ranking Systems: A Methodological Review. Final Report |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Soubhik Barari, Ji Eun Park, Susan Paddock, NORC at the University of Chicago |
| Source: | NORC at the University of Chicago. 2025. |
| Availability: | NORC at the University of Chicago. 55 East Monrow Street, 30th Floor, Chicago, IL 60603. Tel: 312-759-4000; Web site: https://www.norc.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 38 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Vanderbilt University |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Reputation, Institutional Evaluation, Colleges, Research Methodology, Construct Validity, Evaluation Methods, Surveys, Bibliometrics, Standards, Cultural Differences, Foreign Countries, Institutional Characteristics, Educational Quality |
| Abstract: | Rankings of international higher education institutions have become influential, newsworthy metrics worldwide. This is unsurprising given the rising prevalence of cross-national college attendance. This report evaluates the methodologies of three major international ranking systems: the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU, or "Shanghai Rankings"), the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE), and the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings (QS). This report serves as an addendum to NORC's prior report (Barari et al., 2024). Issues identified with domestic rankings in the U.S. also apply to international systems, with some additional challenges particular to the international case: (1) There are inherent challenges to cross-national standardization and comparability; (2) There are many layers of subjectivity in international rankings; and (3) The intended purpose of each ranking is not clear. This report offers several key recommendations to address these challenges. [This report was produced by NORC Research Science.] |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED675805 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED675805 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED675805 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: International College Ranking Systems: A Methodological Review. Final Report – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Soubhik+Barari%22">Soubhik Barari</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ji+Eun+Park%22">Ji Eun Park</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Susan+Paddock%22">Susan Paddock</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22NORC+at+the+University+of+Chicago%22">NORC at the University of Chicago</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22NORC+at+the+University+of+Chicago%22"><i>NORC at the University of Chicago</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: NORC at the University of Chicago. 55 East Monrow Street, 30th Floor, Chicago, IL 60603. Tel: 312-759-4000; Web site: https://www.norc.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 38 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Vanderbilt University – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reputation%22">Reputation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Evaluation%22">Institutional Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colleges%22">Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construct+Validity%22">Construct Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliometrics%22">Bibliometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+Differences%22">Cultural Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Characteristics%22">Institutional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Rankings of international higher education institutions have become influential, newsworthy metrics worldwide. This is unsurprising given the rising prevalence of cross-national college attendance. This report evaluates the methodologies of three major international ranking systems: the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU, or "Shanghai Rankings"), the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE), and the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings (QS). This report serves as an addendum to NORC's prior report (Barari et al., 2024). Issues identified with domestic rankings in the U.S. also apply to international systems, with some additional challenges particular to the international case: (1) There are inherent challenges to cross-national standardization and comparability; (2) There are many layers of subjectivity in international rankings; and (3) The intended purpose of each ranking is not clear. This report offers several key recommendations to address these challenges. [This report was produced by NORC Research Science.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED675805 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED675805 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 38 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Reputation Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Construct Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Bibliometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Cultural Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: International College Ranking Systems: A Methodological Review. Final Report Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: NORC at the University of Chicago – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Soubhik Barari – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ji Eun Park – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Susan Paddock IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: NORC at the University of Chicago Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |