Improving Student-Teacher Relationships through Feedback: The Development and Evaluation of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series. EdWorkingPaper No. 25-1299
Saved in:
| Title: | Improving Student-Teacher Relationships through Feedback: The Development and Evaluation of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series. EdWorkingPaper No. 25-1299 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | David A. Kalkstein, Gregory M. Walton, Laura Meili, Virginia Isarraras, Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University |
| Source: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. 2025. |
| Availability: | Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 37 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Chan Zuckerberg Initiative |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Grade 4 Intermediate Grades Grade 5 Middle Schools Grade 6 Grade 7 Junior High Schools Secondary Education Grade 8 Grade 9 High Schools Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Student Relationship, Feedback (Response), Faculty Development, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Grade 4, Grade 5, Grade 6, Grade 7, Grade 8, Grade 9, Grade 10, Grade 11, Grade 12, Teacher Attitudes, Asynchronous Communication, Independent Study, Pilot Projects |
| Abstract: | High-quality academic feedback, especially feedback that highlights errors, mistakes, misunderstandings and shortcomings, is one of the most valuable tools teachers have for promoting student growth and learning. It is how teachers help students go beyond what they could accomplish on their own (Vygotsky, 1978). It is unsurprising, then, that high-quality feedback is an emphasis of many leading educational organizations. However, providing effective feedback can also pose significant challenge for both givers and receivers. Sometimes, teachers avoid giving negative feedback to protect students' feelings. Sometimes receiving critical feedback can sting. Then students may disengage from the very resource that could help them learn. Inspired by innovative educators, the science of "wise feedback" has revealed a solution. Past laboratory and small-scale field experiments show that, when students understand critical feedback as a reflection of a teacher's high standards and belief in their potential to meet those standards, the benefits for student learning and growth, and for teacher-student relationships, can be transformative. What is needed to take these insights to scale is an efficient means to equip teachers with an understanding of the psychological dynamics that underlie the feedback exchange and how they can put this understanding to work with their students. The "Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development (PD) Learning Series" integrates hard-earned wisdom from educators with psychological theory and research to formalize and clarify the key constructs at play in the feedback exchange and a set of concrete strategies for delivering critical feedback that builds trust with students, promotes student engagement and motivation, and ultimately improves academic outcomes. The strategies emphasized in this learning series benefit all students, but can be especially helpful for students from historically marginalized backgrounds in education, for specific reasons we will discuss. We describe the "Wise Feedback PD Learning Series," including relevant theoretical background and the iterative design process we have used to develop and evaluate it. We then describe learnings from the largest deployment to date, along with follow-up steps and future directions. [The development of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series was also supported by the Research Partnership for Professional Learning (RPPL) to Leading Educators. Initial implementation and design work were conducted in partnership with The College Board and Equal Opportunity Schools.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | ED678276 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED678276 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED678276 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Improving Student-Teacher Relationships through Feedback: The Development and Evaluation of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series. EdWorkingPaper No. 25-1299 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+A%2E+Kalkstein%22">David A. Kalkstein</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gregory+M%2E+Walton%22">Gregory M. Walton</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laura+Meili%22">Laura Meili</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Virginia+Isarraras%22">Virginia Isarraras</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Annenberg+Institute+for+School+Reform+at+Brown+University%22">Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Annenberg+Institute+for+School+Reform+at+Brown+University%22"><i>Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 37 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Intermediate+Grades%22">Intermediate Grades</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+10%22">Grade 10</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Development%22">Program Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+10%22">Grade 10</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asynchronous+Communication%22">Asynchronous Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Independent+Study%22">Independent Study</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pilot+Projects%22">Pilot Projects</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: High-quality academic feedback, especially feedback that highlights errors, mistakes, misunderstandings and shortcomings, is one of the most valuable tools teachers have for promoting student growth and learning. It is how teachers help students go beyond what they could accomplish on their own (Vygotsky, 1978). It is unsurprising, then, that high-quality feedback is an emphasis of many leading educational organizations. However, providing effective feedback can also pose significant challenge for both givers and receivers. Sometimes, teachers avoid giving negative feedback to protect students' feelings. Sometimes receiving critical feedback can sting. Then students may disengage from the very resource that could help them learn. Inspired by innovative educators, the science of "wise feedback" has revealed a solution. Past laboratory and small-scale field experiments show that, when students understand critical feedback as a reflection of a teacher's high standards and belief in their potential to meet those standards, the benefits for student learning and growth, and for teacher-student relationships, can be transformative. What is needed to take these insights to scale is an efficient means to equip teachers with an understanding of the psychological dynamics that underlie the feedback exchange and how they can put this understanding to work with their students. The "Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development (PD) Learning Series" integrates hard-earned wisdom from educators with psychological theory and research to formalize and clarify the key constructs at play in the feedback exchange and a set of concrete strategies for delivering critical feedback that builds trust with students, promotes student engagement and motivation, and ultimately improves academic outcomes. The strategies emphasized in this learning series benefit all students, but can be especially helpful for students from historically marginalized backgrounds in education, for specific reasons we will discuss. We describe the "Wise Feedback PD Learning Series," including relevant theoretical background and the iterative design process we have used to develop and evaluate it. We then describe learnings from the largest deployment to date, along with follow-up steps and future directions. [The development of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series was also supported by the Research Partnership for Professional Learning (RPPL) to Leading Educators. Initial implementation and design work were conducted in partnership with The College Board and Equal Opportunity Schools.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED678276 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED678276 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 37 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 4 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 5 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 6 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 7 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 8 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 9 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 10 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 11 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 12 Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Asynchronous Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Independent Study Type: general – SubjectFull: Pilot Projects Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Improving Student-Teacher Relationships through Feedback: The Development and Evaluation of the Stanford/Leading Educators Wise Feedback Professional Development Learning Series. EdWorkingPaper No. 25-1299 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David A. Kalkstein – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gregory M. Walton – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Laura Meili – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Virginia Isarraras IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |