How Districts Scale Instructional Improvement That Lasts
Saved in:
| Title: | How Districts Scale Instructional Improvement That Lasts |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | H. Alix Gallagher, Leah Faw, Benjamin W. Cottingham, Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) |
| Source: | Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 2026. |
| Availability: | Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 520 Galvez Mall, CERAS Room 401, Stanford, CA 94305-3001. Tel: 650-724-2832; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: info@edpolicyinca.org; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | School Districts, Instructional Improvement, Sustainability, Instructional Leadership, Capacity Building, Systems Approach, Networks, Program Implementation, Barriers, Faculty Workload |
| Geographic Terms: | California |
| Abstract: | This practice brief explores why many districts struggle to scale lasting, instructional improvement and highlights the importance of district systems--structures and processes--in successfully scaling improvement initiatives. Drawing on data from districts' work with California Education Partners, the authors contrast effective district system engagement with common pitfalls such as delegating leadership to school principals, relying on teachers' informal networks to spread improvements, and maintaining too many priorities to focus effectively on scaling up. District leaders play a pivotal role in engaging system components to support teachers and schools in districtwide improvement because only these leaders have the authority to repurpose existing system resources, create new structures as needed to fill gaps, and monitor systemwide progress to identify and adapt to challenges. The purpose of this brief is to lift up the role of district systems--structures and processes--in enabling successful scaling of instructional improvement across the entire district. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | ED680427 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED680427 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED680427 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Districts Scale Instructional Improvement That Lasts – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22H%2E+Alix+Gallagher%22">H. Alix Gallagher</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leah+Faw%22">Leah Faw</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benjamin+W%2E+Cottingham%22">Benjamin W. Cottingham</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stanford+University%2C+Policy+Analysis+for+California+Education+%28PACE%29%22">Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Policy+Analysis+for+California+Education%2C+PACE%22"><i>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</i></searchLink>. 2026. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 520 Galvez Mall, CERAS Room 401, Stanford, CA 94305-3001. Tel: 650-724-2832; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: info@edpolicyinca.org; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Improvement%22">Instructional Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sustainability%22">Sustainability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Leadership%22">Instructional Leadership</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Capacity+Building%22">Capacity Building</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+Approach%22">Systems Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Networks%22">Networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Workload%22">Faculty Workload</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This practice brief explores why many districts struggle to scale lasting, instructional improvement and highlights the importance of district systems--structures and processes--in successfully scaling improvement initiatives. Drawing on data from districts' work with California Education Partners, the authors contrast effective district system engagement with common pitfalls such as delegating leadership to school principals, relying on teachers' informal networks to spread improvements, and maintaining too many priorities to focus effectively on scaling up. District leaders play a pivotal role in engaging system components to support teachers and schools in districtwide improvement because only these leaders have the authority to repurpose existing system resources, create new structures as needed to fill gaps, and monitor systemwide progress to identify and adapt to challenges. The purpose of this brief is to lift up the role of district systems--structures and processes--in enabling successful scaling of instructional improvement across the entire district. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED680427 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED680427 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 Subjects: – SubjectFull: School Districts Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Sustainability Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Leadership Type: general – SubjectFull: Capacity Building Type: general – SubjectFull: Systems Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: Networks Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Barriers Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Workload Type: general – SubjectFull: California Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Districts Scale Instructional Improvement That Lasts Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: H. Alix Gallagher – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leah Faw – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Benjamin W. Cottingham IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2026 Titles: – TitleFull: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |