TK-12 Education Governance in California: Past, Present, and Future
Saved in:
| Title: | TK-12 Education Governance in California: Past, Present, and Future |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jeannie Myung, Heather J. Hough, Julie A. Marsh, Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) |
| Source: | Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 2025. |
| Availability: | Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 520 Galvez Mall, CERAS Room 401, Stanford, CA 94305-3001. Tel: 650-724-2832; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: info@edpolicyinca.org; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 94 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Early Childhood Education Elementary Education Kindergarten Primary Education Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Kindergarten, Elementary Secondary Education, Governance, Educational Administration, Public Education, Administrative Organization |
| Geographic Terms: | California |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Serrano v Priest, Proposition 13 (California 1978), No Child Left Behind Act 2001 |
| Abstract: | Governance is the foundation for successful policy development and implementation as well as effective district- and school-level practices. Numerous efforts throughout California's history have sought to address systemic incoherence and fragmentation in governance. While these reforms have brought progress in areas such as increasing attention to equity and local control, they have also exposed persistent structural issues, including overlapping roles and unclear lines of accountability. This report situates ongoing education challenges within a broader historical context, drawing attention to the enduring need for governance reform in the state. California's current governance system is complex, comprising multiple overlapping entities at state, regional, and local levels. This web of relationships and decision-making pathways can enable collaboration and open diverse opportunities for support but can also introduce inefficiencies and conflicting priorities. To analyze the effectiveness of the state's education governance system, this report uses a framework that deconstructs governance into six critical dimensions: (1) Strategic thinking; (2) Accountability; (3) Capacity; (4) Knowledge governance; (5) Stakeholder involvement; and (6) Whole-of-system perspective. Findings from interviews with education policy experts indicate that despite strengths in California's commitment to equity and continuous improvement, fragmentation of authority remains a pervasive issue, contributing to inadequate capacity and ineffective policy implementation. Weak accountability systems and limited use of data impede efforts to monitor outcomes and evaluate the success of reforms. Interviewees also highlighted that while stakeholder engagement occurs consistently under the Local Control Funding Formula, it often lacks depth and impact in practice. The report concludes with recommendations for strengthening California's education governance that draw on discussion and insights from the expert convening facilitated by Policy Analysis for California Education. Central to these recommendations is the need to clarify the roles and responsibilities of state education agencies to address long-standing fragmentation and enhance coherence. We propose that these roles be structured around three core functions of governance: (1) Policy and funding, led by the governor; (2) Implementation and capacity development, overseen by the California Department of Education under a director appointed by the State Board of Education; and (3) Evaluation and system accountability, for which the state superintendent of public instruction would be responsible. A governance realignment of this nature would require legislative action but not a constitutional amendment. Such a shift would clarify lines of authority, reduce redundancy, and strengthen the overall effectiveness and coherence of California's education governance system |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | ED680429 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED680429 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED680429 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: TK-12 Education Governance in California: Past, Present, and Future – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeannie+Myung%22">Jeannie Myung</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heather+J%2E+Hough%22">Heather J. Hough</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Julie+A%2E+Marsh%22">Julie A. Marsh</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stanford+University%2C+Policy+Analysis+for+California+Education+%28PACE%29%22">Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Policy+Analysis+for+California+Education%2C+PACE%22"><i>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 520 Galvez Mall, CERAS Room 401, Stanford, CA 94305-3001. Tel: 650-724-2832; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: info@edpolicyinca.org; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 94 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Early+Childhood+Education%22">Early Childhood Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Kindergarten%22">Kindergarten</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Primary+Education%22">Primary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Kindergarten%22">Kindergarten</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Governance%22">Governance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Administration%22">Educational Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Education%22">Public Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Organization%22">Administrative Organization</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Serrano+v+Priest%22">Serrano v Priest</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Proposition+13+%28California+1978%29%22">Proposition 13 (California 1978)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22No+Child+Left+Behind+Act+2001%22">No Child Left Behind Act 2001</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Governance is the foundation for successful policy development and implementation as well as effective district- and school-level practices. Numerous efforts throughout California's history have sought to address systemic incoherence and fragmentation in governance. While these reforms have brought progress in areas such as increasing attention to equity and local control, they have also exposed persistent structural issues, including overlapping roles and unclear lines of accountability. This report situates ongoing education challenges within a broader historical context, drawing attention to the enduring need for governance reform in the state. California's current governance system is complex, comprising multiple overlapping entities at state, regional, and local levels. This web of relationships and decision-making pathways can enable collaboration and open diverse opportunities for support but can also introduce inefficiencies and conflicting priorities. To analyze the effectiveness of the state's education governance system, this report uses a framework that deconstructs governance into six critical dimensions: (1) Strategic thinking; (2) Accountability; (3) Capacity; (4) Knowledge governance; (5) Stakeholder involvement; and (6) Whole-of-system perspective. Findings from interviews with education policy experts indicate that despite strengths in California's commitment to equity and continuous improvement, fragmentation of authority remains a pervasive issue, contributing to inadequate capacity and ineffective policy implementation. Weak accountability systems and limited use of data impede efforts to monitor outcomes and evaluate the success of reforms. Interviewees also highlighted that while stakeholder engagement occurs consistently under the Local Control Funding Formula, it often lacks depth and impact in practice. The report concludes with recommendations for strengthening California's education governance that draw on discussion and insights from the expert convening facilitated by Policy Analysis for California Education. Central to these recommendations is the need to clarify the roles and responsibilities of state education agencies to address long-standing fragmentation and enhance coherence. We propose that these roles be structured around three core functions of governance: (1) Policy and funding, led by the governor; (2) Implementation and capacity development, overseen by the California Department of Education under a director appointed by the State Board of Education; and (3) Evaluation and system accountability, for which the state superintendent of public instruction would be responsible. A governance realignment of this nature would require legislative action but not a constitutional amendment. Such a shift would clarify lines of authority, reduce redundancy, and strengthen the overall effectiveness and coherence of California's education governance system – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED680429 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED680429 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 94 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Kindergarten Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Governance Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Organization Type: general – SubjectFull: California Type: general – SubjectFull: Serrano v Priest Type: general – SubjectFull: Proposition 13 (California 1978) Type: general – SubjectFull: No Child Left Behind Act 2001 Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: TK-12 Education Governance in California: Past, Present, and Future Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jeannie Myung – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heather J. Hough – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Julie A. Marsh IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
