View in EDS

Effectiveness of the National R&D Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners Educative ELA Curriculum: A Report of a Quasi-Experiment in Four School Districts. Research Report

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Effectiveness of the National R&D Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners Educative ELA Curriculum: A Report of a Quasi-Experiment in Four School Districts. Research Report
Language: English
Authors: Andrew P. Jaciw, Adam Schellinger, Zahava Nickell, Val Lazarev, Jenna Zacamy, Empirical Education Inc.
Source: Grantee Submission. 2026.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 83
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R305C200008
Document Type: Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Secondary Education
Elementary Education
Grade 8
Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Descriptors: Research and Development Centers, Program Effectiveness, Educational Improvement, Secondary School Students, English Instruction, Language Arts, English Learners, Curriculum Evaluation, Curriculum Design, Grade 8, Outcomes of Education, Language Proficiency, Academic Achievement, Curriculum Implementation, Fidelity, Faculty Development, Academic Language, Achievement Gains
Abstract: In partnership with WestEd's National Research & Development Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners, researchers from Empirical Education conducted a one-year quasi-experimental study evaluating the effectiveness of the Educative English Language Arts (E-ELA), a 12-week three-unit eighth-grade curriculum designed to strengthen literacy and academic language development for English Learners (ELs), particularly long-term English Learners (LTELs). E-ELA was developed to expand teacher expertise and improve classroom learning opportunities for ELs through educative instructional materials, professional development sessions, and coaching. The curriculum engages students with rigorous texts, multimodal resources, collaborative discussion, and scaffolded reading and writing tasks. This study was conducted in spring 2025 across four districts in three states. A total of 20 teachers implemented E-ELA across 46 eighth-grade classes that included either single-teacher and co-teaching models. Participating teachers were either general education ELA or English Language Development (ELD) teachers. The researchers compared outcomes for students in E-ELA classrooms with matched comparison students in similar classes receiving their districts' standard ELA curriculum. Student outcome data were drawn from state ELA assessments and state English language proficiency (ELP) assessments. Researchers constructed matched analytic samples using propensity score methods with exact matching by district and EL classification to ensure baseline equivalence. In addition to estimating impacts on student ELA achievement and ELP outcomes, the study examined implementation fidelity and teacher experience through teacher surveys and interviews. The researchers found that teachers enjoyed implementing the materials, with high teacher participation in professional development and positive perceptions of E-ELA as engaging, standards-aligned, and appropriate for students. Teachers also reported shifts in instructional beliefs, increasingly recognizing that ELs can engage in rigorous, grade-level learning while developing academic language. While no statistically significant effects were found for LTELs on ELA outcomes, newcomer and intermediate ELs demonstrated positive gains, and LTEL students who had received at least eight weeks of E-ELA instruction showed significant improvements in writing, listening, and speaking on ELP assessments. The climate of federal education research, implementation in mixed-ELP classrooms beyond the originally intended LTEL population, and reduced implementation due to scheduling and testing should all be considered when interpreting these findings. Yet teacher feedback suggests that the curriculum remains a promising approach to expanding ELs access to engaging, rigorous, grade-level instruction. The full report and appendices are provided.
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: ED680919
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED680919
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Effectiveness of the National R&D Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners Educative ELA Curriculum: A Report of a Quasi-Experiment in Four School Districts. Research Report
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrew+P%2E+Jaciw%22">Andrew P. Jaciw</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adam+Schellinger%22">Adam Schellinger</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zahava+Nickell%22">Zahava Nickell</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Val+Lazarev%22">Val Lazarev</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jenna+Zacamy%22">Jenna Zacamy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Empirical+Education+Inc%2E%22">Empirical Education Inc.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2026.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 83
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R305C200008
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+and+Development+Centers%22">Research and Development Centers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+Instruction%22">English Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Arts%22">Language Arts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+Learners%22">English Learners</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Evaluation%22">Curriculum Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Design%22">Curriculum Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Proficiency%22">Language Proficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Implementation%22">Curriculum Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fidelity%22">Fidelity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Gains%22">Achievement Gains</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In partnership with WestEd's National Research & Development Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners, researchers from Empirical Education conducted a one-year quasi-experimental study evaluating the effectiveness of the Educative English Language Arts (E-ELA), a 12-week three-unit eighth-grade curriculum designed to strengthen literacy and academic language development for English Learners (ELs), particularly long-term English Learners (LTELs). E-ELA was developed to expand teacher expertise and improve classroom learning opportunities for ELs through educative instructional materials, professional development sessions, and coaching. The curriculum engages students with rigorous texts, multimodal resources, collaborative discussion, and scaffolded reading and writing tasks. This study was conducted in spring 2025 across four districts in three states. A total of 20 teachers implemented E-ELA across 46 eighth-grade classes that included either single-teacher and co-teaching models. Participating teachers were either general education ELA or English Language Development (ELD) teachers. The researchers compared outcomes for students in E-ELA classrooms with matched comparison students in similar classes receiving their districts' standard ELA curriculum. Student outcome data were drawn from state ELA assessments and state English language proficiency (ELP) assessments. Researchers constructed matched analytic samples using propensity score methods with exact matching by district and EL classification to ensure baseline equivalence. In addition to estimating impacts on student ELA achievement and ELP outcomes, the study examined implementation fidelity and teacher experience through teacher surveys and interviews. The researchers found that teachers enjoyed implementing the materials, with high teacher participation in professional development and positive perceptions of E-ELA as engaging, standards-aligned, and appropriate for students. Teachers also reported shifts in instructional beliefs, increasingly recognizing that ELs can engage in rigorous, grade-level learning while developing academic language. While no statistically significant effects were found for LTELs on ELA outcomes, newcomer and intermediate ELs demonstrated positive gains, and LTEL students who had received at least eight weeks of E-ELA instruction showed significant improvements in writing, listening, and speaking on ELP assessments. The climate of federal education research, implementation in mixed-ELP classrooms beyond the originally intended LTEL population, and reduced implementation due to scheduling and testing should all be considered when interpreting these findings. Yet teacher feedback suggests that the curriculum remains a promising approach to expanding ELs access to engaging, rigorous, grade-level instruction. The full report and appendices are provided.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED680919
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED680919
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 83
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research and Development Centers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Arts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English Learners
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 8
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Implementation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fidelity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Achievement Gains
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Effectiveness of the National R&D Center to Improve Education for Secondary English Learners Educative ELA Curriculum: A Report of a Quasi-Experiment in Four School Districts. Research Report
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Empirical Education Inc.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andrew P. Jaciw
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Adam Schellinger
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zahava Nickell
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Val Lazarev
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jenna Zacamy
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Grantee Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1