Identifying Satisfied/Dissatisfied Service Encounters in Higher Education

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Identifying Satisfied/Dissatisfied Service Encounters in Higher Education
Language: English
Authors: Chahal, Hardeep, Devi, Pinkey
Source: Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective. 2013 21(2):211-222.
Availability: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.comcom
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2013
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Higher Education, Stakeholders, Teaching Methods, Delivery Systems, Satisfaction, College Students, Critical Incidents Method
DOI: 10.1108/09684881311310728
ISSN: 0968-4883
Abstract: Purpose: This paper seeks to explore satisfactory and dissatisfactory service encounters in higher education. Design/methodology/approach: The data are collected through the well established critical incident technique (CIT) method. All the satisfied and dissatisfied critical incidents are then grouped on the basis of Bitner et al.'s classification under three headings, i.e. service delivery system (group I), (un)fulfilled needs and requests (group II) and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions (group III). A total of 20 students took part in the study on a voluntary basis and reported 210 incidents. On average, every student provided ten to 12 incidents. Findings: The study results identified both satisfied and dissatisfied service encounters in the three identified groups. A majority of the satisfied (62.5 per cent) and dissatisfied (74.5 per cent) critical incidents were related to service delivery system. However the remaining two groups, i.e. (un)fulfilled needs and requests and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions, showed a smaller percentage of satisfied and dissatisfied incidents in higher education. Research limitations/implications: Owing to the exploratory nature of the study and the scope and size of the study sample, the results outlined are tentative in nature. The research study also only investigates the experiences of one stakeholder group (students). Practical implications: Although universities periodically organise various training programmes and workshops for updating the knowledge of the teachers, these programmes are yet to be made more effective. Hence in this regard it is suggested to design an effective policy for monitoring the usefulness of such programmes. Originality/value: This study makes a first attempt to pursue CIT across significant service dimensions of higher education that encompass teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure encompassing both satisfied and dissatisfied incidents which till today has not been considered in the literature. (Contains 2 tables.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 34
Entry Date: 2013
Accession Number: EJ1004444
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1004444
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Identifying Satisfied/Dissatisfied Service Encounters in Higher Education
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chahal%2C+Hardeep%22">Chahal, Hardeep</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Devi%2C+Pinkey%22">Devi, Pinkey</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Quality+Assurance+in+Education%3A+An+International+Perspective%22"><i>Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective</i></searchLink>. 2013 21(2):211-222.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.comcom
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: PhysDesc
  Label: Physical Description
  Group: PhysDesc
  Data: PDF
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 12
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2013
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholders%22">Stakeholders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delivery+Systems%22">Delivery Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+Incidents+Method%22">Critical Incidents Method</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1108/09684881311310728
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0968-4883
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: This paper seeks to explore satisfactory and dissatisfactory service encounters in higher education. Design/methodology/approach: The data are collected through the well established critical incident technique (CIT) method. All the satisfied and dissatisfied critical incidents are then grouped on the basis of Bitner et al.'s classification under three headings, i.e. service delivery system (group I), (un)fulfilled needs and requests (group II) and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions (group III). A total of 20 students took part in the study on a voluntary basis and reported 210 incidents. On average, every student provided ten to 12 incidents. Findings: The study results identified both satisfied and dissatisfied service encounters in the three identified groups. A majority of the satisfied (62.5 per cent) and dissatisfied (74.5 per cent) critical incidents were related to service delivery system. However the remaining two groups, i.e. (un)fulfilled needs and requests and polite behaviour/unprompted and unsolicited actions, showed a smaller percentage of satisfied and dissatisfied incidents in higher education. Research limitations/implications: Owing to the exploratory nature of the study and the scope and size of the study sample, the results outlined are tentative in nature. The research study also only investigates the experiences of one stakeholder group (students). Practical implications: Although universities periodically organise various training programmes and workshops for updating the knowledge of the teachers, these programmes are yet to be made more effective. Hence in this regard it is suggested to design an effective policy for monitoring the usefulness of such programmes. Originality/value: This study makes a first attempt to pursue CIT across significant service dimensions of higher education that encompass teaching, examination, library, computer lab, administration and infrastructure encompassing both satisfied and dissatisfied incidents which till today has not been considered in the literature. (Contains 2 tables.)
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 34
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2013
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1004444
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1004444
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1108/09684881311310728
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 211
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Delivery Systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical Incidents Method
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Identifying Satisfied/Dissatisfied Service Encounters in Higher Education
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chahal, Hardeep
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Devi, Pinkey
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2013
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0968-4883
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 21
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective
              Type: main
ResultId 1