View in EDS

Things Rank and Gross in Nature: A Review and Synthesis of Moral Disgust

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Things Rank and Gross in Nature: A Review and Synthesis of Moral Disgust
Language: English
Authors: Chapman, Hanah A., Anderson, Adam K.
Source: Psychological Bulletin. Mar 2013 139(2):300-327.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2013
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Adult Education
Elementary Secondary Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Moral Values, Failure, Language Usage, Relationship, Moral Development, Moral Issues, Figurative Language, Biochemistry, Perception, Diseases, Sanitation, Hazardous Materials, Hygiene, Sensory Experience, Food, Nonverbal Communication, Sexuality, Stimuli, Neurological Organization, Psychological Patterns, Neuropsychology
DOI: 10.1037/a0030964
ISSN: 0033-2909
Abstract: Much like unpalatable foods, filthy restrooms, and bloody wounds, moral transgressions are often described as "disgusting." This linguistic similarity suggests that there is a link between moral disgust and more rudimentary forms of disgust associated with toxicity and disease. Critics have argued, however, that such references are purely metaphorical, or that moral disgust may be limited to transgressions that remind us of more basic disgust stimuli. Here we review the evidence that moral transgressions do genuinely evoke disgust, even when they do not reference physical disgust stimuli such as unusual sexual behaviors or the violation of purity norms. Moral transgressions presented verbally or visually and those presented as social transactions reliably elicit disgust, as assessed by implicit measures, explicit self-report, and facial behavior. Evoking physical disgust experimentally renders moral judgments more severe, and physical cleansing renders them more permissive or more stringent, depending on the object of the cleansing. Last, individual differences in the tendency to experience disgust toward physical stimuli are associated with variation in moral judgments and morally relevant sociopolitical attitudes. Taken together, these findings converge to support the conclusion that moral transgressions can in fact elicit disgust, suggesting that moral cognition may draw upon a primitive rejection response. We highlight a number of outstanding issues and conclude by describing 3 models of moral disgust, each of which aims to provide an account of the relationship between moral and physical disgust. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 180
Entry Date: 2013
Accession Number: EJ1006931
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1006931
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Things Rank and Gross in Nature: A Review and Synthesis of Moral Disgust
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chapman%2C+Hanah+A%2E%22">Chapman, Hanah A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anderson%2C+Adam+K%2E%22">Anderson, Adam K.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Psychological+Bulletin%22"><i>Psychological Bulletin</i></searchLink>. Mar 2013 139(2):300-327.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: PhysDesc
  Label: Physical Description
  Group: PhysDesc
  Data: PDF
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 28
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2013
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Adult+Education%22">Adult Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+Values%22">Moral Values</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Failure%22">Failure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Relationship%22">Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+Development%22">Moral Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+Issues%22">Moral Issues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Figurative+Language%22">Figurative Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biochemistry%22">Biochemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Perception%22">Perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diseases%22">Diseases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sanitation%22">Sanitation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hazardous+Materials%22">Hazardous Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hygiene%22">Hygiene</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensory+Experience%22">Sensory Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food%22">Food</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nonverbal+Communication%22">Nonverbal Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sexuality%22">Sexuality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stimuli%22">Stimuli</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neurological+Organization%22">Neurological Organization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Patterns%22">Psychological Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neuropsychology%22">Neuropsychology</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/a0030964
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0033-2909
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Much like unpalatable foods, filthy restrooms, and bloody wounds, moral transgressions are often described as "disgusting." This linguistic similarity suggests that there is a link between moral disgust and more rudimentary forms of disgust associated with toxicity and disease. Critics have argued, however, that such references are purely metaphorical, or that moral disgust may be limited to transgressions that remind us of more basic disgust stimuli. Here we review the evidence that moral transgressions do genuinely evoke disgust, even when they do not reference physical disgust stimuli such as unusual sexual behaviors or the violation of purity norms. Moral transgressions presented verbally or visually and those presented as social transactions reliably elicit disgust, as assessed by implicit measures, explicit self-report, and facial behavior. Evoking physical disgust experimentally renders moral judgments more severe, and physical cleansing renders them more permissive or more stringent, depending on the object of the cleansing. Last, individual differences in the tendency to experience disgust toward physical stimuli are associated with variation in moral judgments and morally relevant sociopolitical attitudes. Taken together, these findings converge to support the conclusion that moral transgressions can in fact elicit disgust, suggesting that moral cognition may draw upon a primitive rejection response. We highlight a number of outstanding issues and conclude by describing 3 models of moral disgust, each of which aims to provide an account of the relationship between moral and physical disgust. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.)
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 180
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2013
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1006931
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1006931
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/a0030964
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 28
        StartPage: 300
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Moral Values
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Failure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Usage
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moral Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moral Issues
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Figurative Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biochemistry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diseases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sanitation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hazardous Materials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hygiene
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensory Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Food
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nonverbal Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sexuality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stimuli
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neurological Organization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological Patterns
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neuropsychology
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Things Rank and Gross in Nature: A Review and Synthesis of Moral Disgust
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chapman, Hanah A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anderson, Adam K.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 2013
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0033-2909
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 139
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Bulletin
              Type: main
ResultId 1