Molasses or Crowds: Making Sense of the Higgs Boson with Two Popular Analogies

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Molasses or Crowds: Making Sense of the Higgs Boson with Two Popular Analogies
Language: English
Authors: Alsop, S., Beale, S.
Source: Physics Education. Sep 2013 48(5):670-676.
Availability: Institute of Physics Publishing. The Public Ledger Building Suite 929, 150 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 215-627-0880; Fax: 215-627-0879; e-mail: info@ioppubusa.com; Web site: http://journals.iop.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 7
Publication Date: 2013
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts, Physics, Logical Thinking, Concept Formation, Nuclear Physics, Teaching Methods
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/48/5/670
ISSN: 0031-9120
Abstract: The recent discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has contributed to a surge of interest in particle physics and science education in general. Given the conceptual difficulty of the phenomenon in question, it is inevitable that teachers and science communicators rely on analogies to explain the Higgs physics and its meaning. Here, we review two popular analogies for explaining the Higgs boson, field and mechanism and their complex relationships. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these analogies and their pedagogical implications.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 24
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: EJ1030306
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:The recent discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has contributed to a surge of interest in particle physics and science education in general. Given the conceptual difficulty of the phenomenon in question, it is inevitable that teachers and science communicators rely on analogies to explain the Higgs physics and its meaning. Here, we review two popular analogies for explaining the Higgs boson, field and mechanism and their complex relationships. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these analogies and their pedagogical implications.
ISSN:0031-9120
DOI:10.1088/0031-9120/48/5/670