Resting Gamma Power Is Linked to Reading Ability in Adolescents
Saved in:
| Title: | Resting Gamma Power Is Linked to Reading Ability in Adolescents |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Tierney, Adam, Strait, Dana L., Kraus, Nina |
| Source: | Developmental Science. Jan 2014 17(1):86-93. |
| Availability: | Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Adolescents, Reading Ability, Brain, Behavior, Maturity (Individuals), Correlation, Reading Fluency, Naming, Adolescent Development |
| DOI: | 10.1111/desc.12094 |
| ISSN: | 1363-755X |
| Abstract: | Infants who have more power within the gamma frequency range at rest develop better language and cognitive abilities over their first 3 years of life (Benasich et al., 2008). This positive trend may reflect the gradual increase in resting gamma power that peaks at about 4 years (Takano & Ogawa, 1998): infants further along the maturational curve may exhibit both increased resting gamma power and more advanced language and cognitive function. Similar to other neural characteristics such as synaptic density, resting gamma power subsequently decreases with further development into adulthood (Tierney, Strait, O'Connell & Kraus, 2013). If previously reported relationships between resting gamma power and behavioral performance reflect variance in maturation, at least in part, negative correlations between resting gamma and behavior may predominate in later developmental stages, during which resting gamma activity is decreasing. We tested this prediction by examining resting gamma activity and language-dependent behavioral performance, reflected by a variety of reading-related tests, in adolescents between the ages of 14 and 15 years. Consistent with our predictions, resting gamma power inversely related to every aspect of reading assessed (i.e. reading fluency, rapid naming, and basic reading proficiency). Our results suggest that resting gamma power acts as an index of maturational progress in adolescents. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 48 |
| Entry Date: | 2014 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1033108 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwGBNv9JQn8so0YEHejZOHPxAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDKgpTuqviAyL7oSZBwIBEICBmgM7aMnZsBxTaQrnXeN8wHHa7HSKsF6Yiz2bfr-YdPcrqPXLONLSLY4sAMJTJPQ__Dqg03RAqZ3lj6OI_XfUU5Ak2HU8ld4Kwp3CtXH57k7VZ9grkMDmlnsjA8bnu8BKIcMYGuiSERwZwI1dkrN7qZAdI3OfqYE9h0ku2Oojkyih_NDoI3PM14xmFNAzRIhbgTZ7NXHUMEXZO4U= Text: Availability: 1 Value: <anid>AN0092983815;5g501jan.14;2018Jul02.08:52;v2.2.500</anid> <title id="AN0092983815-1">Resting gamma power is linked to reading ability in adolescents. </title> <p>Infants who have more power within the gamma frequency range at rest develop better language and cognitive abilities over their first 3 years of life (Benasich et al., 2008). This positive trend may reflect the gradual increase in resting gamma power that peaks at about 4 years (Takano &amp; Ogawa, 1998): infants further along the maturational curve may exhibit both increased resting gamma power and more advanced language and cognitive function. Similar to other neural characteristics such as synaptic density, resting gamma power subsequently decreases with further development into adulthood (Tierney, Strait, O'Connell &amp; Kraus, 2013). If previously reported relationships between resting gamma power and behavioral performance reflect variance in maturation, at least in part, negative correlations between resting gamma and behavior may predominate in later developmental stages, during which resting gamma activity is decreasing. We tested this prediction by examining resting gamma activity and language‐dependent behavioral performance, reflected by a variety of reading‐related tests, in adolescents between the ages of 14 and 15 years. Consistent with our predictions, resting gamma power inversely related to every aspect of reading assessed (i.e. reading fluency, rapid naming, and basic reading proficiency). Our results suggest that resting gamma power acts as an index of maturational progress in adolescents.</p> <p>Infants who have more power within the gamma frequency range at rest develop better language and cognitive abilities over their first 3 years of life (Benasich et al., 2008). This positive trend may reflect the gradual increase in resting gamma power that peaks at about 4 years (Takano &amp; Ogawa, 1998). We show that resting gamma power relates inversely to reading ability, suggesting that resting gamma power acts as an index of maturational progress in adolescents.</p> <p>It is known that resting gamma power is linked to linguistic ability in infants.</p> <p>Resting gamma increases with age in early childhood but decreases with age in later childhood through adulthood.</p> <p>We show that adolescents with less resting gamma have better reading skills.</p> <p>The gamma–reading relationship may, therefore, be driven by neural maturation.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-2">Introduction</hd> <p>Stimulus‐induced increases in neural activity within the gamma frequency range (here defined as 31–50 Hz) have been linked to a variety of cognitive and perceptual abilities, including object recognition (Rodriguez, George, Lachaux, Martinerie, Renault &amp; Varela, [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref1">29</reflink>] ; Csibra, Davis, Spratling &amp; Johnson, [<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref2">7</reflink>] ; Gruber, Muller &amp; Keil, [<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref3">19</reflink>] ; Uhlhaas, Roux, Singer, Haenschel, Sirenteanu &amp; Rodriguez, [<reflink idref="bib43" id="ref4">43</reflink>] ), memory (Tallon‐Baudry, Bertrand, Peronnet &amp; Pernier, [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref5">37</reflink>] ; Tallon‐Baudry, Kreiter &amp; Bertrand, [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref6">38</reflink>] ; Fell, Klaver, Lehnertz, Grunwald, Schaller, Elger &amp; Fernández, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref7">12</reflink>] ), and attention (Tiitinen, Sinkkonen, Reinikainen, Alho, Lavikainen &amp; Näätänen, [<reflink idref="bib41" id="ref8">41</reflink>] ; Fan, Byrne, Worden, Guise, McCandliss, Fossella &amp; Posner, [<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref9">11</reflink>] ). Stimulus‐induced gamma activity's relationship to these processes has led to studies addressing whether the amount of gamma activity in the absence of a stimulus (i.e. during a resting state) likewise relates to individual differences in behavioral performance. Accordingly, Benasich, Gou, Choudhury and Harris ([<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref10">4</reflink>] ) found that resting power within the gamma range positively associates with individual performance on standardized language measures in preschoolers. Moreover, children with more resting gamma activity performed better on subsequent language tests conducted 2 years later (Gou, Choudhury &amp; Benasich, [<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref11">16</reflink>] ). This indicates that differences in resting gamma power during infancy have the power to predict the subsequent development of language abilities.</p> <p>The underlying cause of the relationship between resting gamma power and linguistic ability is unknown. Here, we considered two possibilities, the first being that correlations between resting gamma power and language abilities in early childhood reflect their covariance with neural maturation (the maturation hypothesis). Synaptic density (Huttenlocher, [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref12">20</reflink>] ), gray matter volume (Pfefferbaum, Mathalon, Sullivan, Rawles, Zipursky &amp; Lim, [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref13">26</reflink>] ), and resting gamma power (Takano &amp; Ogawa, [<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref14">36</reflink>] ) all increase until about age 4 as the brain builds up a surplus of synapses. Throughout infancy, language abilities also rapidly develop as their underlying neuronal circuitry matures (Bates, Thal &amp; Janowsky, [<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref15">3</reflink>] ; Paus, Zijdenbos, Worsley, Collins, Blumenthal, Giedd, Rapoport &amp; Evans, [<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref16">25</reflink>] ; Thomson, Giedd, Woods, MacDonald, Evans &amp; Toga, [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref17">39</reflink>] , Schmithorst, Wilke, Dardzinski &amp; Holland, [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref18">31</reflink>] ; Nagy, Westerberg &amp; Klingberg, [<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref19">24</reflink>] ). As a result, children under the age of 4 who are further along the neural maturational trajectory may show both increased resting gamma power and stronger language skills compared to same‐aged children who are maturing at a slower pace.</p> <p>A second potential explanation is that gamma activity reflects neural characteristics that facilitate language acquisition (the neural coordination hypothesis). Given that gamma oscillations take place when neuronal activity is bound together both within and across brain regions (Gray &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref20">18</reflink>] ; Gray, Koenig, Engel &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref21">17</reflink>] ; Engel, Kreiter, Konig &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref22">8</reflink>] ; Engel, Konig, Kreiter &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib9" id="ref23">9</reflink>] ; Engel, Konig &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref24">10</reflink>] ; Freiwald, Kreiter &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref25">13</reflink>] ; Roelfsema, Engel, Konig &amp; Singer, [<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref26">30</reflink>] ), resting gamma power may reflect the extent to which processing in distant brain regions can be coordinated. Given that language processing relies on neural resources that are spread throughout the brain, coordination of disparate brain regions – reflected in resting gamma power – could be vital for language acquisition.</p> <p>These two theories can both account for the relationship between resting gamma power and language abilities in early childhood. How, then, can we decide between them? One way to test these theories would be to examine resting gamma power in an older population of children: adolescents. Between childhood and early adolescence, after the initial buildup of synapses has halted, frequently used synapses are retained while others are pruned, leading to an overall decrease in synaptic density and gray matter volume (Huttenlocher, [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref27">20</reflink>] , [<reflink idref="bib21" id="ref28">21</reflink>] ; Pfefferbaum et al., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref29">26</reflink>] ; Reiss, Abrams, Singer, Ross &amp; Denckla, [<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref30">28</reflink>] ; Huttenlocher &amp; Dabholkar, [<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref31">22</reflink>] ; Sowell, Thompson, Holmes, Batth, Jernigan &amp; Toga, [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref32">34</reflink>] ; Sowell, Thompson, Tessner &amp; Toga, [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref33">35</reflink>] ; Sowell, Peterson, Thompson, Welcome, Henkenius &amp; Toga, [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref34">33</reflink>] ; Gogtay, Giedd, Lusk, Hayashi, Greenstein, Vaituzis, Nugent, Herman, Clasen, Toga, Rapoport &amp; Thompson, [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref35">15</reflink>] ; Blakemore &amp; Choudhury, [<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref36">5</reflink>] ; Whitford, Rennie, Grieve, Clark, Gordon &amp; Williams, [<reflink idref="bib46" id="ref37">46</reflink>] ). Resting power within the gamma range follows a similar maturational trajectory, peaking at age 4 and decreasing thereafter (Takano &amp; Ogawa, [<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref38">36</reflink>] ; Tierney et al., [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref39">40</reflink>] ). If the link between resting gamma power and language abilities is driven by neural maturation, the relationship between gamma power and language ability should be negative during adolescence, when more advanced neural maturation is linked to less resting gamma power and, presumably, enhanced language skills. If, on the other hand, resting gamma power reflects neural characteristics vital for language processing at any developmental period, the relationship between gamma power and language ability should be positive. We examined these two possibilities by recording resting gamma power and assessing one aspect of language ability, reading, in adolescents.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-3">Methods</hd> <hd id="AN0092983815-4">Subjects</hd> <p>All experimental procedures were approved by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board. Ninety‐nine high‐school freshman (44 female) ages 14–15 from the Chicago metropolitan area participated in this study (mean age = 14.6, SD = 0.36). All participants had normal hearing (air‐conduction binaural hearing thresholds ≤ 20 dB HL at octave frequencies from 125 to 8000 Hz) and no participants reported a history of neurological deficits or learning disabilities. Informed assent and parent consent were obtained for all testing procedures and subjects were compensated for their participation. All participants had IQ scores within the normal range (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (Weschler [<reflink idref="bib45" id="ref40">45</reflink>] ) 2‐scale IQ ≥ 76).</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-5">Data collection</hd> <p>Resting cortical electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded using NeuroScan Acquire 4.3 (Compumedics) with a 31‐channel tin electrode cap (Electrocap International, Eaton, OH, USA). Reference electrodes were placed on the earlobes and blink‐monitoring electrodes were placed on the superior and outer canthi of the left eye. Contact impedance for all electrodes was kept below 10 kΩ. Subjects were asked to sit quietly, without moving, in a lighted soundproof booth for 3 minutes. Subjects were instructed to keep their eyes open except when blinking and to fixate on a point on the wall in front of them to avoid excessive eye movement.</p> <p>Three composite measures of reading were assessed. Single word‐reading fluency was measured using the Test of Oral Word Reading Efficiency (Torgesen, Wagner &amp; Rashotte, [<reflink idref="bib42" id="ref41">42</reflink>] ), which contains subtests requiring subjects to read words (Sight subtest) and nonwords (Phonemic Decoding subtest) aloud as rapidly as possible. Rapid naming was assessed using two subtests from the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (Wagner, Torgesen &amp; Rashotte, [<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref42">44</reflink>] ) in which subjects are asked to read aloud lists of letters and numbers as rapidly as possible. Finally, untimed word‐reading proficiency was assessed using the Woodcock Johnson Test of Achievement's Basic Reading score (Woodcock, McGrew &amp; Mather, [<reflink idref="bib48" id="ref43">48</reflink>] ), which comprises untimed single word‐ and nonword‐reading subtests (Letter‐Word ID and Word Attack subtests, respectively). All measures analyzed were age‐normed standardized scores.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-6">Data analysis</hd> <p>Continuous EEG recordings were bandpass‐filtered offline from 1 to 100 Hz with a 12‐dB rolloff to emphasize cortical contributions to the signal. The removal of eye‐blink artifacts was conducted with the NeuroScan Edit 4.3 spatial filtering algorithm. The spatial filter, by comparing the data with a hand‐made ‘clean file’ free of eye blinks and other artifacts, first generates an average eye blink. It then extracts the first covariance and component values using a spatial singular value decomposition based on principal component analysis. Finally, it develops a filter specifically sensitive to eye blinks using those covariance values. This results in continuous EEG data in which eye blinks have been removed, permitting the analysis of data uncontaminated by eye blinks without the loss of large portions of data. Visual inspection confirmed that this procedure successfully removed all eye blinks.</p> <p>The spatially filtered 3‐minute recording was then segmented into 180 1‐second non‐overlapping epochs. Epochs containing amplitude spikes greater than 75 μV were rejected as artifacts. The frequency spectrum of each epoch was then measured using a fast Fourier transform in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA). The resulting 180 frequency spectra were averaged to create an average frequency spectrum for each channel in each participant. Following Benasich et al. ([<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref44">4</reflink>] ), gamma‐band frequencies were limited to 31–50 Hz. To confirm the specificity of relationships between gamma and reading ability, power within theta (3–7 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), and beta (20–30 Hz) frequency bands was assessed as well. Absolute power within this frequency range was calculated using the equation 20*log10(x) at each electrode site. We divided the 31 channels into five groups: frontal (F3, F4, FZ, FP1, FP2, and FPZ), temporoparietal (FC3, FC4, FCZ, C3, C4, CZ, CP3, CP4, CPZ, P3, P4, and PZ), left (F7, FT7, TP7, and T5), right (F8, FT8, TP8, and T6), and occipital (O1, O2, and OZ). A sixth grouping comprised all 31 channels. Resting gamma power was averaged across electrodes within each electrode grouping. Outliers were corrected to two standard deviations from the mean to ensure that correlations were not driven by outliers. This procedure had a minimal effect on the data; for the channel grouping consisting of all 31 channels, for example, only one outlier was corrected.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-7">Results</hd> <p>We hypothesized that resting gamma power relates to linguistic ability due to a common link with maturational progress. To test this hypothesis, we ran Pearson's partial correlations between each channel grouping and raw scores on the behavioral tests, covarying for age (Table [NaN] ). Descriptive statistics for each behavioral test can be found in Table [NaN] . For every group of channels and every behavioral test, the relationship between performance and resting gamma power was negative, i.e. lower gamma was associated with better performance. Resting gamma power significantly correlated with all aspects of reading‐related language performance across all channels. Of the 31 channels analyzed, 28 showed a significant negative correlation (p &lt; .05) between resting gamma power and rapid naming ability, 25 showed a significant negative correlation between resting gamma power and reading fluency, and 22 showed a significant negative correlation between resting gamma power and untimed naming. When covarying for both age and IQ or for IQ alone, relationships between reading ability and resting gamma power in all channels remained significant for all three reading tests (p &lt; .01). This, together with the lack of any correlation between resting gamma power and IQ (Table [NaN] ), indicates that the relationship between gamma and reading was not driven by factors related to general intelligence. Figure [NaN] displays relationships between resting gamma power across all channels and performance on behavioral measures. Figure [NaN] displays the Pearson's r value for the relationship between resting gamma power and rapid naming ability for each channel across the scalp. When analyzing the data using the electrode groups, of the 18 correlations between resting gamma power and reading ability assessed, all but one were significant (p &lt; .05) and all were in the same direction (i.e. less resting gamma power corresponded to better reading ability). Figure [NaN] displays the topological distribution of resting gamma power, while Figure [NaN] displays the average frequency spectrum from 1 to 50 Hz across all channels and subjects.</p> <p>Pearson's partial correlations between resting gamma power and behavioral performance, covarying for age at time of testing</p> <p> <ephtml> &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th align="left"&gt;Correlation with resting gamma (Pearson's r, p&amp;#x2010;values)&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Frontal&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Temporoparietal&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Occipital&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Left&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Right&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;All&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Rapid naming&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.31, 0.0020&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.39, 0.0001&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.32, 0.0012&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.40, 0.0001&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.36, 0.0002&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.39, 0.0001&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Reading fluency &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.25, 0.013&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.29, 0.0039&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.24, 0.015&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.30, 0.0025&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.28, 0.0050&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.30, 0.0027&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Untimed naming &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.25, 0.0119&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.27, 0.0067&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.18, 0.073&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.24, 0.016&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.25, 0.0133&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.27, 0.0076&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;IQ&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.04, 0.6731&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.10, 0.3254&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.11, 0.2995&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.04, 0.6674&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;0.02, 0.8560&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.06, 0.5568&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt; </ephtml> </p> <p>Descriptive statistics for IQ and reading measures</p> <p> <ephtml> &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th align="left"&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Mean&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;SD&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Range&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Rapid naming&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;98.7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;13.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="&amp;#x2013;"&gt;67&amp;#x2013;127&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Reading fluency &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;96.6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;12.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="&amp;#x2013;"&gt;65&amp;#x2013;129&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Untimed naming &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;98.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;9.8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="&amp;#x2013;"&gt;73&amp;#x2013;128&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;IQ&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;101.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;10.9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="&amp;#x2013;"&gt;76&amp;#x2013;127&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt; </ephtml> </p> <p>While we also considered relationships between reading and resting oscillatory activity within the theta (3–7 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (20–30 Hz) frequency ranges, significant relationships were largely limited to the gamma frequency range. Table [NaN] lists correlations between reading ability and resting power in these other three frequency bands; all relationships were insignificant except for a negative relationship between beta power and rapid naming as well as between theta power and untimed naming.</p> <p>Pearson's partial correlations between resting power in theta, alpha, and beta bands and behavioral performance, covarying for age at time of testing</p> <p> <ephtml> &lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th align="left"&gt;Correlation with resting oscillatory power, all channels (Pearson's r, p&amp;#x2010;values)&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Theta&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Alpha&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align="center"&gt;Beta&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Rapid naming&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.15, 0.1272&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;0.01, 0.8934&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.26, 0.0094&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Reading fluency &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.01, 0.9360&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;0.03, 0.7694&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.15, 0.1521&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;Untimed naming &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.23, 0.0203&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.07, 0.4883&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.18, 0.0800&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="left"&gt;IQ&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.20, 0.0491&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.11, 0.2680&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="char" char="."&gt;&amp;#x2212;0.01, 0.8878&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt; </ephtml> </p> <hd id="AN0092983815-8">Discussion</hd> <p>We investigated the question of why resting gamma power is linked to language ability in young children. One possibility, the neural coordination hypothesis, is that resting gamma power is an index of the extent to which different brain regions can coordinate. An alternative possibility, the maturation hypothesis, suggests that children who mature earlier show both improved language skills and greater resting gamma power, as in the first few years of life resting gamma increases with age (Takano &amp; Ogawa, [<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref45">36</reflink>] ).</p> <p>We find that reading ability inversely relates to resting gamma power in young adolescents. Correlations between resting power within theta, alpha, and beta bands and reading ability were weaker and less consistent, suggesting that the relationship between resting oscillatory power and reading skill is largely limited to the gamma range. Since resting gamma power gradually decreases during adolescence (Tierney et al., [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref46">40</reflink>] ), this finding supports the maturation hypothesis: relationships between resting gamma and language skill exist because both are affected by neural changes occurring as children mature. On the other hand, these results do not support the neural coordination hypothesis: if resting gamma power reflected neural characteristics vital for language processing across the life span, one would expect positive relationships between resting gamma and language ability to predominate regardless of the age range tested.</p> <p>Resting gamma power's relationship to neural maturation may be driven by the fact that, during adolescence, synaptic pruning gradually decreases synaptic density and, therefore, gray matter volume, which correlates with resting oscillatory power (Thomson et al., [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref47">39</reflink>] ). A number of changes in neural structure occur during adolescence that could facilitate the development of language skills, tying language ability to maturation. These neural changes include an increase in white matter density within the arcuate fasciculus (Paus et al., [<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref48">25</reflink>] ; Schmithorst et al., [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref49">31</reflink>] ; Giorgio, Watkins, Chadwick, James, Winmill, Douaud, De Stefano, Matthews, Smith, Johansen‐Berg &amp; James, [<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref50">14</reflink>] ), the neuronal tract connecting receptive and productive language areas, and an enlargement of the posterior section of the corpus callosum, which connects language areas (Thomson et al., [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref51">39</reflink>] ; Snook, Paulson, Roy, Phillips &amp; Beaulieu, [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref52">32</reflink>] ). White matter maturation continues throughout adolescence within prefrontal (Barnea‐Goraly, Menon, Eckert, Tamm, Bammer, Karchemskiy, Dant &amp; Reiss, [<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref53">2</reflink>] ) and parietal (Whitford et al., [<reflink idref="bib46" id="ref54">46</reflink>] ; Ashtari, Cervellione, Hasan, Wu, McIlree, Kester, Ardekani, Roofeh, Szeszko &amp; Kumra, [<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref55">1</reflink>] ) cortices, both of which are involved in language functions, including reading (Price, Moore &amp; Frackowiak, [<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref56">27</reflink>] ). These changes could underscore language performance; Nagy et al. ([<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref57">24</reflink>] ), for example, found that white matter development within the left temporal lobe correlated with reading ability.</p> <p>In adults, increases in gamma power induced by a stimulus accompany many cognitive and perceptual tasks, including object recognition (Rodriguez et al., [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref58">29</reflink>] ; Csibra et al., [<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref59">7</reflink>] ; Gruber et al., [<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref60">19</reflink>] ; Uhlhaas et al., [<reflink idref="bib43" id="ref61">43</reflink>] ), attention (Tiitinen et al., [<reflink idref="bib41" id="ref62">41</reflink>] ; Fan et al., [<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref63">11</reflink>] ), memory (Tallon‐Baudry et al., [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref64">37</reflink>] ; Tallon‐Baudry et al., [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref65">38</reflink>] ; Fell et al., [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref66">12</reflink>] ), and learning (Miltner, Braun, Arnold, Witte &amp; Taub, [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref67">23</reflink>] ). Nevertheless, we find that, in adolescents, less resting gamma power is linked to greater reading ability. These findings can be reconciled. Studies of stimulus‐induced gamma power commonly examine an increase in gamma over baseline. Thus, an overall decrease in the level of ongoing gamma activity would not, all else being equal, lead to a decrease in gamma induced by a stimulus. In fact, decreased resting gamma could lead to increases in induced gamma if the absolute response to a stimulus stays constant.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-9">Future directions</hd> <p>If language abilities are affected by the progress of neural maturation, identifying adolescents who are maturationally delayed could help diagnose one potential cause of language processing difficulties. An adolescent with both low language skills and abnormally high resting gamma power for his or her age may be maturationally delayed with respect to peers. On the other hand, an adolescent with low language skills and resting gamma power within the normal range for his or her age could have problems with language that stem from some other source. The facility with which resting gamma activity is acquired makes it particularly attractive as a measure of neural maturation when compared with another recently proposed measure of neural maturation, the density of theta and delta oscillations during sleep, which requires many hours of data collection that take place over multiple nights (Campbell &amp; Feinberg, [<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref68">6</reflink>] ). In contrast, resting gamma activity can be collected in only 3 minutes. Still, future work identifying and quantifying other potential factors that can affect resting gamma power and the collection of age norms is needed before resting gamma power can be considered to serve this purpose.</p> <p>Relationships between maturational progress and behavioral and cognitive abilities are not likely to be limited to the language domain but may extend to skills such as attention and memory. Future work could examine this proposal by investigating relationships in adolescent subjects between resting gamma power, working memory, and attention. Negative correlations between resting gamma power and these abilities would provide further support for our claim that the development of cognitive abilities in adolescence is driven in part by the rate of neural maturation.</p> <p>Future work might also consider relationships between resting gamma power and other language measures. While our measures consist of reading‐related tests, the measures used by Benasich et al. ([<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref69">4</reflink>] ) and Gou et al. ([<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref70">16</reflink>] ) comprise tests of receptive and expressive language skills, phonological awareness, and the comprehension and use of morphological and syntactical rules. We cannot rule out the possibility that the inverse correlation we find is specific to language processes underlying the ability to read. Future work could investigate this possibility using a test such as the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF; Wiig, Secord &amp; Semel, [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref71">47</reflink>] ), which assesses language skills not specific to reading ability and is normed from ages 3 to 21. Gou et al. ([<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref72">16</reflink>] ) found positive correlations between resting gamma power in preschool and CELF performance at age 5. The finding of a negative correlation between gamma and CELF performance in adolescents would confirm that the inversion of the relationship between resting gamma and language abilities between preschool and adolescence is not limited to reading.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-10">Conclusions</hd> <p>Here, we report that resting gamma power in adolescents inversely correlates with reading ability. We suggest that resting gamma can be used as an index of neural maturation during early adolescence and that differences in neural maturation account for some of the variance in reading ability within normal readers.</p> <hd id="AN0092983815-11">Acknowledgements</hd> <p>The authors wish to thank Trent Nicol, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark and Jennifer Krizman for their comments on this manuscript. This project is supported by the Mathers Foundation, National Science Foundation grant 1015614, and the Knowles Hearing Center.</p> <ref id="AN0092983815-12"> <title>References</title> <blist> <bibl id="bib1" idref="ref55" type="bt">1</bibl> <bibtext>Ashtari, M., Cervellione, K., Hasan, K., Wu, J., McIlree, C., Kester, H., Ardekani, B., Roofeh, D., Szeszko, P., &amp; Kumra, S. ( 2007 ). White matter development during late adolescence in healthy males: a cross‐sectional diffusion tensor imaging study. NeuroImage, 35, 501 – 510. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib2" idref="ref53" type="bt">2</bibl> <bibtext>Barnea‐Goraly, N., Menon, V., Eckert, M., Tamm, L., Bammer, R., Karchemskiy, A., Dant, C., &amp; Reiss, A. ( 2005 ). White matter development during childhood and adolescence: a cross‐sectional diffusion tensor imaging study. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1848 – 1854. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib3" idref="ref15" type="bt">3</bibl> <bibtext>Bates, E., Thal, D., &amp; Janowsky, J. ( 1992 ). Early language development and its neural correlates. In I. Rappin &amp; S. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 6: Child neuropsychology (pp. 69 – 110 ). Amsterdam : Elsevier. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib4" idref="ref10" type="bt">4</bibl> <bibtext>Benasich, A., Gou, Z., Choudhury, N., &amp; Harris, K. ( 2008 ). Early cognitive and language skills are linked to resting frontal gamma power across the first 3 years. Behavioral Brain Research, 195, 215 – 222. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib5" idref="ref36" type="bt">5</bibl> <bibtext>Blakemore, S., &amp; Choudhury, S. ( 2006 ). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296 – 312. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib6" idref="ref68" type="bt">6</bibl> <bibtext>Campbell, I., &amp; Feinberg, I. ( 2009 ). Longitudinal trajectories of non‐rapid eye movement delta and theta EEG as indicators of adolescent brain maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 5177 – 5180. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib7" idref="ref2" type="bt">7</bibl> <bibtext>Csibra, G., Davis, G., Spratling, M., &amp; Johnson, M. ( 2000 ). Gamma oscillations and object processing in the infant brain. Science, 290, 1582 – 1585. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib8" idref="ref22" type="bt">8</bibl> <bibtext>Engel, A.K., Konig, P., Kreiter, A.K., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1991a ). Inter‐hemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science, 252, 1177 – 1179. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib9" idref="ref23" type="bt">9</bibl> <bibtext>Engel, A.K., Konig, P., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1991b ). Direct physiological evidence for scene segmentation by temporal coding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 88, 9136 – 9140. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib10" idref="ref24" type="bt">10</bibl> <bibtext>Engel, A.K., Kreiter, A.K., Konig, P., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1991c ). Synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses between striate and extra‐striate visual cortical areas of the cat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 88, 6048 – 6052. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib11" idref="ref9" type="bt">11</bibl> <bibtext>Fan, J., Byrne, J., Worden, M., Guise, K., McCandliss, B., Fossella, J., &amp; Posner, M. ( 2007 ). The relation of brain oscillations to attentional networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 6197 – 6206. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib12" idref="ref7" type="bt">12</bibl> <bibtext>Fell, J., Klaver, P., Lehnertz, K., Grunwald, T., Schaller, C., Elger, C., &amp; Fernández, G. ( 2001 ). Human memory formation is accompanied by rhinal‐hippocampal coupling and decoupling. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1259 – 1264. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib13" idref="ref25" type="bt">13</bibl> <bibtext>Freiwald, W.A., Kreiter, A.K., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1995 ). Stimulus dependent intercolumnar synchronization of single unit responses in cat area 17. NeuroReport, 6, 2348 – 2352. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib14" idref="ref50" type="bt">14</bibl> <bibtext>Giorgio, A., Watkins, K., Chadwick, M., James, S., Winmill, L., Douaud, G., De Stefano, N., Matthews, P., Smith, S., Johansen‐Berg, H., &amp; James, A. ( 2010 ). Longitudinal changes in grey and white matter during adolescence. NeuroImage, 49, 94 – 103. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib15" idref="ref35" type="bt">15</bibl> <bibtext>Gogtay, N., Giedd, J.N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K.M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A.C., Nugent, T.F. III, Herman, D.H., Clasen, L.S., Toga, A.W., Rapoport, J.L., &amp; Thompson, P.M. ( 2004 ). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 8174 – 8179. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib16" idref="ref11" type="bt">16</bibl> <bibtext>Gou, Z., Choudhury, N., &amp; Benasich, A. ( 2011 ). Resting frontal gamma power at 16, 24 and 36 months predicts individual differences in language and cognition at 4 and 5 years. Behavioral Brain Research, 220, 263 – 270. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib17" idref="ref21" type="bt">17</bibl> <bibtext>Gray, C.M., Koenig, P., Engel, A.K., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1989 ). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter‐columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature, 338, 334 – 337. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib18" idref="ref20" type="bt">18</bibl> <bibtext>Gray, C.M., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1989 ). Stimulus‐specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 86, 1698 – 1702. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib19" idref="ref3" type="bt">19</bibl> <bibtext>Gruber, T., Muller, M., &amp; Keil, A. ( 2002 ). Modulation of induced gamma band responses in a perceptual learning task in the human EEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 732 – 744. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib20" idref="ref12" type="bt">20</bibl> <bibtext>Huttenlocher, P. ( 1979 ). Synaptic density in human frontal cortex: developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Research, 163, 195 – 205. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib21" idref="ref28" type="bt">21</bibl> <bibtext>Huttenlocher, P. ( 1990 ). Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia, 28, 517 – 527. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib22" idref="ref31" type="bt">22</bibl> <bibtext>Huttenlocher, P., &amp; Dabholkar, A. ( 1997 ). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387, 167 – 178. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib23" idref="ref67" type="bt">23</bibl> <bibtext>Miltner, W., Braun, C., Arnold, M., Witte, H., &amp; Taub, E. ( 1999 ). Coherence of gamma‐band EEG activity as a basis for associative learning. Nature, 397, 434 – 436. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib24" idref="ref19" type="bt">24</bibl> <bibtext>Nagy, Z., Westerberg, H., &amp; Klingberg, T. ( 2004 ). Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1227 – 1233. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib25" idref="ref16" type="bt">25</bibl> <bibtext>Paus, T., Zijdenbos, A., Worsley, K., Collins, D., Blumenthal, J., Giedd, J., Rapoport, J., &amp; Evans, A. ( 1999 ). Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. Science, 283, 1908 – 1911. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib26" idref="ref13" type="bt">26</bibl> <bibtext>Pfefferbaum, A., Mathalon, D., Sullivan, E., Rawles, J., Zipursky, R., &amp; Lim, K. ( 1994 ). A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood. Archives of Neurology, 51, 874 – 887. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib27" idref="ref56" type="bt">27</bibl> <bibtext>Price, C., Moore, C., &amp; Frackowiak, R. ( 1996 ). The effect of varying stimulus rate and duration on brain activity during reading. NeuroImage, 3, 40 – 52. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib28" idref="ref30" type="bt">28</bibl> <bibtext>Reiss, A., Abrams, M., Singer, H., Ross, J., &amp; Denckla, M. ( 1996 ). Brain development, gender and IQ in children: a volumetric imaging study. Brain, 119, 1763 – 1774. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib29" idref="ref1" type="bt">29</bibl> <bibtext>Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J.P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., &amp; Varela, F.J. ( 1999 ). Perception's shadow: long‐distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397, 430 – 433. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib30" idref="ref26" type="bt">30</bibl> <bibtext>Roelfsema, P.R., Engel, A.K., Konig, P., &amp; Singer, W. ( 1997 ). Visuo‐motor integration is associated with zero time‐lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature, 385, 157 – 161. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib31" idref="ref18" type="bt">31</bibl> <bibtext>Schmithorst, V., Wilke, M., Dardzinski, B., &amp; Holland, S. ( 2002 ). Correlation of white matter diffusivity and anisotropy with age during childhood and adolescence: a cross‐sectional diffusion‐tensor MR imaging study. Radiology, 222, 212 – 218. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib32" idref="ref52" type="bt">32</bibl> <bibtext>Snook, L., Paulson, L., Roy, D., Phillips, L., &amp; Beaulieu, C. ( 2005 ). Diffusion tensor imaging of neurodevelopment in children and young adults. NeuroImage, 26, 1164 – 1173. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib33" idref="ref34" type="bt">33</bibl> <bibtext>Sowell, E., Peterson, B., Thompson, P., Welcome, S., Henkenius, A., &amp; Toga, A. ( 2003 ). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 309 – 315. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib34" idref="ref32" type="bt">34</bibl> <bibtext>Sowell, E., Thompson, P., Holmes, C., Batth, R., Jernigan, T., &amp; Toga, A. ( 1999 ). Localizing age‐related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping. NeuroImage, 9, 587 – 597. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib35" idref="ref33" type="bt">35</bibl> <bibtext>Sowell, E., Thompson, P., Tessner, K., &amp; Toga, A. ( 2001 ). Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8819 – 8829. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib36" idref="ref14" type="bt">36</bibl> <bibtext>Takano, T., &amp; Ogawa, T. ( 1998 ). Characterization of developmental changes in EEG gamma‐band activity during childhood using the autoregressive model. Acta Paediatrica Japan, 40, 446 – 452. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib37" idref="ref5" type="bt">37</bibl> <bibtext>Tallon‐Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Peronnet, F., &amp; Pernier, J. ( 1998 ). Induced gamma band activity during the delay of a visual short‐term memory task in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 4244 – 4254. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib38" idref="ref6" type="bt">38</bibl> <bibtext>Tallon‐Baudry, C., Kreiter, A.K., &amp; Bertrand, O. ( 1999 ). Sustained and transient oscillatory responses in the gamma and beta bands in a visual short‐term memory task in humans. Visual Neuroscience, 16, 449 – 459. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib39" idref="ref17" type="bt">39</bibl> <bibtext>Thomson, P., Giedd, J., Woods, R., MacDonald, D., Evans, A., &amp; Toga, A. ( 2000 ). Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps. Nature, 404, 190 – 193. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib40" idref="ref39" type="bt">40</bibl> <bibtext>Tierney, A., Strait, D., O'Connell, S., &amp; Kraus, N. ( 2013 ). Developmental changes in resting gamma power from age three to adulthood. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, 1040 – 1042. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib41" idref="ref8" type="bt">41</bibl> <bibtext>Tiitinen, H., Sinkkonen, J., Reinikainen, K., Alho, K., Lavikainen, J., &amp; Näätänen, R. ( 1993 ). Selective attention enhances the auditory 40‐Hz transient response in humans. Nature, 364, 59 – 60. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib42" idref="ref41" type="bt">42</bibl> <bibtext>Torgesen, J.F., Wagner, R.K., &amp; Rashotte, C.A. ( 1999 ). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX : Pro‐Ed. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib43" idref="ref4" type="bt">43</bibl> <bibtext>Uhlhaas, P., Roux, F., Singer, W., Haenschel, C., Sirenteanu, R., &amp; Rodriguez, E. ( 2009 ). The development of neural synchrony reflects late maturation and restructuring of functional networks in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 9866 – 9871. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib44" idref="ref42" type="bt">44</bibl> <bibtext>Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., &amp; Rashotte, C.A. ( 1999 ). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX : Pro‐Ed. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib45" idref="ref40" type="bt">45</bibl> <bibtext>Wechsler, D. ( 1999 ). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX : Harcourt Assessment. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib46" idref="ref37" type="bt">46</bibl> <bibtext>Whitford, T., Rennie, C., Grieve, S., Clark, C., Gordon, E., &amp; Williams, L. ( 2007 ). Brain maturation in adolescence: concurrent changes in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 228 – 237. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib47" idref="ref71" type="bt">47</bibl> <bibtext>Wiig, E., Secord, W., &amp; Semel, E. ( 1992 ). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals‐Preschool. San Antonio, TX : The Psychological Corporation. </bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib48" idref="ref43" type="bt">48</bibl> <bibtext>Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., &amp; Mather, N. ( 2001 ). Woodcock‐Johnson Psycho‐Educational Battery ‐ Third Edition. Itasca, IL : Riverside. </bibtext> </blist> </ref> <p>Graph: Subjects with less resting gamma power displayed superior linguistic abilities. Correlation between resting gamma and rapid naming, r = −0.39, p = .0001; correlation between resting gamma and reading fluency, r = −0.30, p = .0027; correlation between resting gamma and untimed naming, r = −0.27, p = .0076.</p> <p>Graph: Topographic plot of the relationship between resting gamma power and rapid naming performance. Darker colors indicate higher Pearson's r‐values, and therefore stronger relationships, while lighter colors indicate lower r‐values and weaker relationships.</p> <p>Graph: Topographic plot of resting gamma power. Lighter colors indicate regions with greater power, while darker colors indicate regions with less power.</p> <p>Graph: Average power spectrum of resting EEG across subjects.</p> <aug> <p>By Adam Tierney; Dana L. Strait and Nina Kraus</p> </aug> |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1033108 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Resting Gamma Power Is Linked to Reading Ability in Adolescents – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tierney%2C+Adam%22">Tierney, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Strait%2C+Dana+L%2E%22">Strait, Dana L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kraus%2C+Nina%22">Kraus, Nina</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Developmental+Science%22"><i>Developmental Science</i></searchLink>. Jan 2014 17(1):86-93. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescents%22">Adolescents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Ability%22">Reading Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain%22">Brain</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior%22">Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maturity+%28Individuals%29%22">Maturity (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Fluency%22">Reading Fluency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Naming%22">Naming</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescent+Development%22">Adolescent Development</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/desc.12094 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1363-755X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Infants who have more power within the gamma frequency range at rest develop better language and cognitive abilities over their first 3 years of life (Benasich et al., 2008). This positive trend may reflect the gradual increase in resting gamma power that peaks at about 4 years (Takano & Ogawa, 1998): infants further along the maturational curve may exhibit both increased resting gamma power and more advanced language and cognitive function. Similar to other neural characteristics such as synaptic density, resting gamma power subsequently decreases with further development into adulthood (Tierney, Strait, O'Connell & Kraus, 2013). If previously reported relationships between resting gamma power and behavioral performance reflect variance in maturation, at least in part, negative correlations between resting gamma and behavior may predominate in later developmental stages, during which resting gamma activity is decreasing. We tested this prediction by examining resting gamma activity and language-dependent behavioral performance, reflected by a variety of reading-related tests, in adolescents between the ages of 14 and 15 years. Consistent with our predictions, resting gamma power inversely related to every aspect of reading assessed (i.e. reading fluency, rapid naming, and basic reading proficiency). Our results suggest that resting gamma power acts as an index of maturational progress in adolescents. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 48 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1033108 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1033108 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/desc.12094 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 86 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adolescents Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Ability Type: general – SubjectFull: Brain Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Maturity (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Fluency Type: general – SubjectFull: Naming Type: general – SubjectFull: Adolescent Development Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Resting Gamma Power Is Linked to Reading Ability in Adolescents Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tierney, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Strait, Dana L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kraus, Nina IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2014 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1363-755X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Developmental Science Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |