School Finance and Technology: A Case Study Using Grid and Group Theory to Explore the Connections
Saved in:
| Title: | School Finance and Technology: A Case Study Using Grid and Group Theory to Explore the Connections |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Case, Stephoni, Harris, Edward L. |
| Source: | Educational Considerations. Spr 2014 41(2):33-42. |
| Availability: | Kansas State University, College of Education. 1100 Mid-Campus Drive, 006 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel: 785-532-5525; Fax: 785-532-7304; e-mail: edcoll@ksu.edu; Web site: http://coe.ksu.edu/EdConsiderations |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Tests/Questionnaires Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Educational Finance, Educational Technology, Technology Integration, School Policy, Teacher Role, Administrator Role, Occupational Information, Work Ethic, Organizational Climate, Organizational Culture, School Surveys, Institutional Characteristics, Questionnaires, Online Surveys, Observation, Position Papers, Content Analysis, School Business Officials, Administrator Attitudes, Central Office Administrators, Leadership Styles, Administrative Organization, Performance Technology, Elementary Secondary Education |
| Abstract: | Using grid and group theory (Douglas 1982, 2011), the study described in this article examined the intersections of technology and school finance in four schools located in districts differing in size, wealth, and commitment to technology integration. In grid and group theory, grid refers to the degree to which policies and role prescriptions either hinder or promote individual autonomy. Group refers to the degree of commitment a person has to the larger social unit. The dynamics of grid and group are simultaneously at work in any social setting, and consequently, over time, certain themes and dominant patterns of thought and behavior tend to define a particular setting. In this study of four schools, neither school size nor budget size were indicators of successful integration and equitable distribution of technology. However grid and group features that promoted either isolation or integration were important indicators for these schools. For example, the weak-group leaders did not provide vision and direction, and individual teachers chose whether or not to integrate technology or not. The strong-group schools were more intentional in their technology mission. Their leaders developed program goals, systems to be used, the types of computers purchased, and use by students. The conclusion that the authors draw from this case study is that technology integration and equitable distribution depended upon the intentionality of those who budgeted the funds and provided necessary training |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 10 |
| Entry Date: | 2015 |
| Access URL: | https://coe.ksu.edu/edconsiderations/back-issues.html |
| Accession Number: | EJ1049905 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwHwUcuJ3FoQY4e3YB0sk-j2AAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDJisAZFjTEkuSqDZ3AIBEICBmu8GAXhA_aiQyXumYpsXMOsHS5346z5dEafkP6ay_bqfFIF4mrBiAq2ERzch5egaNGnzz5LiLVJDxyD0gLH2dHCDN5pvi512swOD0r1egPdd84vW-7FDIl2DH4d2_LOPdS6jnK4dJ_i94ag6ffkCovBSfYcr7wApwxDN9513St5FbdRZdCppOuBgPFOqafHM2olRBe_fSLvmna4= Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1049905 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: School Finance and Technology: A Case Study Using Grid and Group Theory to Explore the Connections – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Case%2C+Stephoni%22">Case, Stephoni</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harris%2C+Edward+L%2E%22">Harris, Edward L.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Considerations%22"><i>Educational Considerations</i></searchLink>. Spr 2014 41(2):33-42. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Kansas State University, College of Education. 1100 Mid-Campus Drive, 006 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel: 785-532-5525; Fax: 785-532-7304; e-mail: edcoll@ksu.edu; Web site: http://coe.ksu.edu/EdConsiderations – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 10 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Tests/Questionnaires<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Policy%22">School Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Role%22">Teacher Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Role%22">Administrator Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+Information%22">Occupational Information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+Ethic%22">Work Ethic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Climate%22">Organizational Climate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Culture%22">Organizational Culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Surveys%22">School Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Characteristics%22">Institutional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+Surveys%22">Online Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Observation%22">Observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Position+Papers%22">Position Papers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Analysis%22">Content Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Business+Officials%22">School Business Officials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Attitudes%22">Administrator Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Central+Office+Administrators%22">Central Office Administrators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Leadership+Styles%22">Leadership Styles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Organization%22">Administrative Organization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Technology%22">Performance Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Using grid and group theory (Douglas 1982, 2011), the study described in this article examined the intersections of technology and school finance in four schools located in districts differing in size, wealth, and commitment to technology integration. In grid and group theory, grid refers to the degree to which policies and role prescriptions either hinder or promote individual autonomy. Group refers to the degree of commitment a person has to the larger social unit. The dynamics of grid and group are simultaneously at work in any social setting, and consequently, over time, certain themes and dominant patterns of thought and behavior tend to define a particular setting. In this study of four schools, neither school size nor budget size were indicators of successful integration and equitable distribution of technology. However grid and group features that promoted either isolation or integration were important indicators for these schools. For example, the weak-group leaders did not provide vision and direction, and individual teachers chose whether or not to integrate technology or not. The strong-group schools were more intentional in their technology mission. Their leaders developed program goals, systems to be used, the types of computers purchased, and use by students. The conclusion that the authors draw from this case study is that technology integration and equitable distribution depended upon the intentionality of those who budgeted the funds and provided necessary training – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 10 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://coe.ksu.edu/edconsiderations/back-issues.html" linkWindow="_blank">http://coe.ksu.edu/edconsiderations/back-issues.html</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1049905 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1049905 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 33 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Finance Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: School Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrator Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Occupational Information Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Ethic Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Climate Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Culture Type: general – SubjectFull: School Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Online Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Observation Type: general – SubjectFull: Position Papers Type: general – SubjectFull: Content Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: School Business Officials Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrator Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Central Office Administrators Type: general – SubjectFull: Leadership Styles Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Organization Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: School Finance and Technology: A Case Study Using Grid and Group Theory to Explore the Connections Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Case, Stephoni – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Harris, Edward L. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2014 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 41 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Considerations Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |