Forming Student Online Teams for Maximum Performance
Saved in:
| Title: | Forming Student Online Teams for Maximum Performance |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Olson, Joel D., Ringhand, Darlene G., Kalinski, Ray C. |
| Source: | American Journal of Business Education. 2015 8(2):139-160. |
| Availability: | Clute Institute. 6901 South Pierce Street Suite 239, Littleton, CO 80128. Tel: 303-904-4750; Fax: 303-978-0413; e-mail: Staff@CluteInstitute.com; Web site: http://www.cluteinstitute.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2015 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Teamwork, Online Courses, Electronic Learning, Student Projects, Student Placement, Group Dynamics, Personality Measures, Critical Path Method, Masters Programs, Business Administration Education, Self Disclosure (Individuals), Assignments, Statistical Significance, Predictor Variables, Extraversion Introversion, Performance Based Assessment, Distance Education, Cognitive Processes, Bias, Models, Probability, Thinking Skills, Measures (Individuals), Personality, Mixed Methods Research |
| ISSN: | 1942-2504 |
| Abstract: | What is the best way to assign graduate business students to online team-based projects? Team assignments are frequently made on the basis of alphabet, time zones or previous performance. This study reviews personality as an indicator of student online team performance. The personality assessment IDE (Insights Discovery Evaluator) was administered to 450 students in the first six-week course of a proprietary online university MBA program. The IDE was utilized for the study because the university had selected the IDE as a part of its business curriculum. In the second week, students were randomly placed on 138 virtual teams and quantitative data collected from an assignment where students self-reported their IDE type. A qualitative method was used to determine subject IDE type in those cases where subjects did not clearly identify their type. Performance was measured using three instructor- graded assignments completed during the course. Student virtual teams were categorized as random, variable and dominant, contingent upon the composition of team personality types. This study found no statistically significant relationship between IDE's personality types or the cognitive trait variables of attitude (extroversion and introversion) or trait function (thinking and feeling) on team performance. Personality trait did not appear to be a variable with the intentional formation of higher performing online student teams. All personality traits performed equally as well. Personality Bias (IDE type homogeneity) was the closest to being statistically significant as a factor in virtual team performance. A model is presented describing the relationship between personality and performance. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 85 |
| Entry Date: | 2015 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1057571 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1057571 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1057571 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Forming Student Online Teams for Maximum Performance – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olson%2C+Joel+D%2E%22">Olson, Joel D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ringhand%2C+Darlene+G%2E%22">Ringhand, Darlene G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kalinski%2C+Ray+C%2E%22">Kalinski, Ray C.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22American+Journal+of+Business+Education%22"><i>American Journal of Business Education</i></searchLink>. 2015 8(2):139-160. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Clute Institute. 6901 South Pierce Street Suite 239, Littleton, CO 80128. Tel: 303-904-4750; Fax: 303-978-0413; e-mail: Staff@CluteInstitute.com; Web site: http://www.cluteinstitute.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teamwork%22">Teamwork</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+Courses%22">Online Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Placement%22">Student Placement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Dynamics%22">Group Dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personality+Measures%22">Personality Measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+Path+Method%22">Critical Path Method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Masters+Programs%22">Masters Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Business+Administration+Education%22">Business Administration Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Disclosure+%28Individuals%29%22">Self Disclosure (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Assignments%22">Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Significance%22">Statistical Significance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Extraversion+Introversion%22">Extraversion Introversion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Based+Assessment%22">Performance Based Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bias%22">Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability%22">Probability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measures+%28Individuals%29%22">Measures (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personality%22">Personality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+Methods+Research%22">Mixed Methods Research</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1942-2504 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: What is the best way to assign graduate business students to online team-based projects? Team assignments are frequently made on the basis of alphabet, time zones or previous performance. This study reviews personality as an indicator of student online team performance. The personality assessment IDE (Insights Discovery Evaluator) was administered to 450 students in the first six-week course of a proprietary online university MBA program. The IDE was utilized for the study because the university had selected the IDE as a part of its business curriculum. In the second week, students were randomly placed on 138 virtual teams and quantitative data collected from an assignment where students self-reported their IDE type. A qualitative method was used to determine subject IDE type in those cases where subjects did not clearly identify their type. Performance was measured using three instructor- graded assignments completed during the course. Student virtual teams were categorized as random, variable and dominant, contingent upon the composition of team personality types. This study found no statistically significant relationship between IDE's personality types or the cognitive trait variables of attitude (extroversion and introversion) or trait function (thinking and feeling) on team performance. Personality trait did not appear to be a variable with the intentional formation of higher performing online student teams. All personality traits performed equally as well. Personality Bias (IDE type homogeneity) was the closest to being statistically significant as a factor in virtual team performance. A model is presented describing the relationship between personality and performance. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 85 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1057571 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1057571 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 139 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teamwork Type: general – SubjectFull: Online Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Projects Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Placement Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Dynamics Type: general – SubjectFull: Personality Measures Type: general – SubjectFull: Critical Path Method Type: general – SubjectFull: Masters Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Business Administration Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Disclosure (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Assignments Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Significance Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Extraversion Introversion Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Based Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Probability Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Measures (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Personality Type: general – SubjectFull: Mixed Methods Research Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Forming Student Online Teams for Maximum Performance Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Olson, Joel D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ringhand, Darlene G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kalinski, Ray C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2015 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1942-2504 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: American Journal of Business Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |