Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks
Saved in:
| Title: | Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Berland, Leema, McKenna, William, Peacock, Stephanie Baker |
| Source: | Advances in Engineering Education. Sum 2012 3(2). |
| Availability: | American Society for Engineering Education. 1818 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 412-624-6815; Fax: 412-624-1108; Web site: http://advances.asee.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2012 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | DUE-0831811 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Engineering Education, Documentation, Student Journals, Interviews, Secondary School Teachers, High School Students, Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, Reflection, Teaching Methods, Observation, Design |
| Geographic Terms: | Texas |
| ISSN: | 1941-1766 |
| Abstract: | Engineering notebooks are a pervasive practice across high school, college, and professional contexts. Within this consistency, there are two basic forms: process-based notebooks serve as a complete record of the engineer's work and are used by the authors to support their endeavors, while product-based notebooks represent a record of final form projects to be evaluated by outsiders. Given this breadth of purposes, expected content and primary audiences, this paper explores students' and teacher's use and perceptions of the utility of engineering notebooks. In this study, we interviewed students and teachers, and examined the student notebooks, from three different high-school engineering classes. Grounded-theory analyses of this data reveals that all classes used process-based notebooks and they all struggled with supporting student reflection, a common teacher goal. In addition, in each class, the notebooks emphasized a different phase of the design process and students similarly reported the utility of notebooks for supporting that phase. The key instructional implication of this work is that facilitating students' meaningful and thorough use of their notebooks requires creating situations in which maintaining notebooks helps them complete their project work. The paper provides examples, pulled from the study data, of how to enact this strategy. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 36 |
| Entry Date: | 2015 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1076123 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFWgaraN_-ZXYAXtPRzPG33AAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDBnVENZPUcBHz36ujQIBEICBmhWU7bCUjth0t49SicZ91_MUnAsQGB2d8NxjCrh3mL7fwlWOta6cVTc0ed-WlaYjKCzvUd4redpLgCq1CVxLWXNOE8ZJhPYZyydBWT96CnA2RfK7kFdR7FRPmZacoT0DoxxAc6nb5MWuRrHxRN1TiQuSLJ6QdS1RCthLftr-aVJ3EgJcbyUM65TGuRtGNbLbzuOThqHG32bruTI= Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1076123 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1076123 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berland%2C+Leema%22">Berland, Leema</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McKenna%2C+William%22">McKenna, William</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peacock%2C+Stephanie+Baker%22">Peacock, Stephanie Baker</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Advances+in+Engineering+Education%22"><i>Advances in Engineering Education</i></searchLink>. Sum 2012 3(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Society for Engineering Education. 1818 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 412-624-6815; Fax: 412-624-1108; Web site: http://advances.asee.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2012 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: DUE-0831811 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Journals%22">Student Journals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviews%22">Interviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Teachers%22">Secondary School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grounded+Theory%22">Grounded Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Analysis%22">Content Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Observation%22">Observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design%22">Design</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Texas%22">Texas</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1941-1766 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Engineering notebooks are a pervasive practice across high school, college, and professional contexts. Within this consistency, there are two basic forms: process-based notebooks serve as a complete record of the engineer's work and are used by the authors to support their endeavors, while product-based notebooks represent a record of final form projects to be evaluated by outsiders. Given this breadth of purposes, expected content and primary audiences, this paper explores students' and teacher's use and perceptions of the utility of engineering notebooks. In this study, we interviewed students and teachers, and examined the student notebooks, from three different high-school engineering classes. Grounded-theory analyses of this data reveals that all classes used process-based notebooks and they all struggled with supporting student reflection, a common teacher goal. In addition, in each class, the notebooks emphasized a different phase of the design process and students similarly reported the utility of notebooks for supporting that phase. The key instructional implication of this work is that facilitating students' meaningful and thorough use of their notebooks requires creating situations in which maintaining notebooks helps them complete their project work. The paper provides examples, pulled from the study data, of how to enact this strategy. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 36 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1076123 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1076123 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Documentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Journals Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary School Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Grounded Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Content Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Observation Type: general – SubjectFull: Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Texas Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Berland, Leema – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McKenna, William – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Peacock, Stephanie Baker IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1941-1766 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 3 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Advances in Engineering Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |