Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks
Language: English
Authors: Berland, Leema, McKenna, William, Peacock, Stephanie Baker
Source: Advances in Engineering Education. Sum 2012 3(2).
Availability: American Society for Engineering Education. 1818 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 412-624-6815; Fax: 412-624-1108; Web site: http://advances.asee.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2012
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: DUE-0831811
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Documentation, Student Journals, Interviews, Secondary School Teachers, High School Students, Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, Reflection, Teaching Methods, Observation, Design
Geographic Terms: Texas
ISSN: 1941-1766
Abstract: Engineering notebooks are a pervasive practice across high school, college, and professional contexts. Within this consistency, there are two basic forms: process-based notebooks serve as a complete record of the engineer's work and are used by the authors to support their endeavors, while product-based notebooks represent a record of final form projects to be evaluated by outsiders. Given this breadth of purposes, expected content and primary audiences, this paper explores students' and teacher's use and perceptions of the utility of engineering notebooks. In this study, we interviewed students and teachers, and examined the student notebooks, from three different high-school engineering classes. Grounded-theory analyses of this data reveals that all classes used process-based notebooks and they all struggled with supporting student reflection, a common teacher goal. In addition, in each class, the notebooks emphasized a different phase of the design process and students similarly reported the utility of notebooks for supporting that phase. The key instructional implication of this work is that facilitating students' meaningful and thorough use of their notebooks requires creating situations in which maintaining notebooks helps them complete their project work. The paper provides examples, pulled from the study data, of how to enact this strategy.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 36
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1076123
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFWgaraN_-ZXYAXtPRzPG33AAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDBnVENZPUcBHz36ujQIBEICBmhWU7bCUjth0t49SicZ91_MUnAsQGB2d8NxjCrh3mL7fwlWOta6cVTc0ed-WlaYjKCzvUd4redpLgCq1CVxLWXNOE8ZJhPYZyydBWT96CnA2RfK7kFdR7FRPmZacoT0DoxxAc6nb5MWuRrHxRN1TiQuSLJ6QdS1RCthLftr-aVJ3EgJcbyUM65TGuRtGNbLbzuOThqHG32bruTI=
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1076123
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1076123
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berland%2C+Leema%22">Berland, Leema</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McKenna%2C+William%22">McKenna, William</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peacock%2C+Stephanie+Baker%22">Peacock, Stephanie Baker</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Advances+in+Engineering+Education%22"><i>Advances in Engineering Education</i></searchLink>. Sum 2012 3(2).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Society for Engineering Education. 1818 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 412-624-6815; Fax: 412-624-1108; Web site: http://advances.asee.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 21
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2012
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Science Foundation (NSF)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: DUE-0831811
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Journals%22">Student Journals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviews%22">Interviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Teachers%22">Secondary School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grounded+Theory%22">Grounded Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Analysis%22">Content Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Observation%22">Observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design%22">Design</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Texas%22">Texas</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1941-1766
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Engineering notebooks are a pervasive practice across high school, college, and professional contexts. Within this consistency, there are two basic forms: process-based notebooks serve as a complete record of the engineer's work and are used by the authors to support their endeavors, while product-based notebooks represent a record of final form projects to be evaluated by outsiders. Given this breadth of purposes, expected content and primary audiences, this paper explores students' and teacher's use and perceptions of the utility of engineering notebooks. In this study, we interviewed students and teachers, and examined the student notebooks, from three different high-school engineering classes. Grounded-theory analyses of this data reveals that all classes used process-based notebooks and they all struggled with supporting student reflection, a common teacher goal. In addition, in each class, the notebooks emphasized a different phase of the design process and students similarly reported the utility of notebooks for supporting that phase. The key instructional implication of this work is that facilitating students' meaningful and thorough use of their notebooks requires creating situations in which maintaining notebooks helps them complete their project work. The paper provides examples, pulled from the study data, of how to enact this strategy.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 36
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2015
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1076123
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1076123
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Engineering Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Documentation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Journals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grounded Theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Content Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Texas
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Berland, Leema
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McKenna, William
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peacock, Stephanie Baker
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1941-1766
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 3
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Advances in Engineering Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1