Time to Dream: 'Reflections on Paul Diederich and the Progressive American High School'

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Time to Dream: 'Reflections on Paul Diederich and the Progressive American High School'
Language: English
Authors: O'Connor, John S., Lessing, Avi D.
Source: Schools: Studies in Education. Fall 2015 12(2):214-220.
Availability: University of Chicago Press. Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel: 877-705-1878; Tel: 773-753-3347; Fax: 877-705-1879; Fax: 773-753-0811; e-mail: subscriptions@press.uchicago.edu; Web site: http://www.press.uchicago.edu
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 7
Publication Date: 2015
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: High Schools, Progressive Education, Educational Methods, Educational Practices, Educational Objectives, Criticism, Educational Attitudes, Relevance (Education)
DOI: 10.1086/683215
ISSN: 1550-1175
Abstract: In this essay, John S. O'Connor and Avi D. Lessing discuss the increasingly reductive and routinized nature of contemporary schools and the costs such an approach holds for students and teachers alike. The current approach is especially troublesome in light of the rich history of progressive voices, such as Paul Diederich, who have cautioned against such an approach for the past 75 years. In the current education climate, schools often concern themselves with the most efficient ways of delivering education, cramming the school day with required classes and common assessments. The authors lament the consequences of these practices, which rob teachers and students of time (to reflect, to create, to think) and which ultimately rob them of their individuality.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 5
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1079918
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:In this essay, John S. O'Connor and Avi D. Lessing discuss the increasingly reductive and routinized nature of contemporary schools and the costs such an approach holds for students and teachers alike. The current approach is especially troublesome in light of the rich history of progressive voices, such as Paul Diederich, who have cautioned against such an approach for the past 75 years. In the current education climate, schools often concern themselves with the most efficient ways of delivering education, cramming the school day with required classes and common assessments. The authors lament the consequences of these practices, which rob teachers and students of time (to reflect, to create, to think) and which ultimately rob them of their individuality.
ISSN:1550-1175
DOI:10.1086/683215