View in EDS

Using the Delphi Method for Selecting Effective Rehabilitation Practices for Case Study Research: Methods, Challenges, and Solutions and Implications for Future Research

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Using the Delphi Method for Selecting Effective Rehabilitation Practices for Case Study Research: Methods, Challenges, and Solutions and Implications for Future Research
Language: English
Authors: Fleming, Allison R., Boeltzig-Brown, Heike, Foley, Susan M.
Source: Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education. 2015 29(4):391-405.
Availability: Springer Publishing Company. 11 West 42nd Street 15th Floor, New York, NY 10036. Tel: 877-687-7476; Tel: 212-431-4370; Fax: 212-941-7842; e-mail: subscriptions@springerpub.com; Web site: http://www.springerpub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2015
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Delphi Technique, Case Studies, Vocational Rehabilitation, State Agencies, Disabilities, Expertise, Mixed Methods Research
DOI: 10.1891/2168-6653.29.4.391
ISSN: 2168-6653
Abstract: Purpose: We describe a modified Delphi method used to select effective state vocational rehabilitation agency practices to prioritize rehabilitation services for individuals with most significant disabilities within the context of Order of Selection, an area where there is little known and published. Specifically, we describe how we applied the Delphi method to case study selection, the methods challenges we faced, and how we addressed those issues. Implications for future research are also discussed. Method: We used a structured nomination process to identify potential practices. An expert panel (N = 12) provided input on the development of indicators of effective rehabilitation practices and rated the nominated practices. Results: Selection of the practices for case study research was based on the ratings from the expert panel, including quantitative and qualitative feedback. Of the 10 practices considered by the panel, the 7 practices with the highest ratings were included in the sample. Conclusions: Using the collective expertise of panelists through a modified Delphi process to select the final case study sample was effective for this research. The panel provided an objective, group-level perspective on the merit of the practices as well as the fit with the goals of the case study.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1083160
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1083160
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Using the Delphi Method for Selecting Effective Rehabilitation Practices for Case Study Research: Methods, Challenges, and Solutions and Implications for Future Research
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fleming%2C+Allison+R%2E%22">Fleming, Allison R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boeltzig-Brown%2C+Heike%22">Boeltzig-Brown, Heike</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Foley%2C+Susan+M%2E%22">Foley, Susan M.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Rehabilitation+Research%2C+Policy%2C+and+Education%22"><i>Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education</i></searchLink>. 2015 29(4):391-405.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer Publishing Company. 11 West 42nd Street 15th Floor, New York, NY 10036. Tel: 877-687-7476; Tel: 212-431-4370; Fax: 212-941-7842; e-mail: subscriptions@springerpub.com; Web site: http://www.springerpub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2015
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delphi+Technique%22">Delphi Technique</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+Rehabilitation%22">Vocational Rehabilitation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Agencies%22">State Agencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disabilities%22">Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+Methods+Research%22">Mixed Methods Research</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1891/2168-6653.29.4.391
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2168-6653
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: We describe a modified Delphi method used to select effective state vocational rehabilitation agency practices to prioritize rehabilitation services for individuals with most significant disabilities within the context of Order of Selection, an area where there is little known and published. Specifically, we describe how we applied the Delphi method to case study selection, the methods challenges we faced, and how we addressed those issues. Implications for future research are also discussed. Method: We used a structured nomination process to identify potential practices. An expert panel (N = 12) provided input on the development of indicators of effective rehabilitation practices and rated the nominated practices. Results: Selection of the practices for case study research was based on the ratings from the expert panel, including quantitative and qualitative feedback. Of the 10 practices considered by the panel, the 7 practices with the highest ratings were included in the sample. Conclusions: Using the collective expertise of panelists through a modified Delphi process to select the final case study sample was effective for this research. The panel provided an objective, group-level perspective on the merit of the practices as well as the fit with the goals of the case study.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2015
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1083160
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1083160
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1891/2168-6653.29.4.391
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 391
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Delphi Technique
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Case Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vocational Rehabilitation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Agencies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expertise
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mixed Methods Research
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Using the Delphi Method for Selecting Effective Rehabilitation Practices for Case Study Research: Methods, Challenges, and Solutions and Implications for Future Research
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fleming, Allison R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boeltzig-Brown, Heike
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Foley, Susan M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2168-6653
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1