Population Invariance of Test Equating and Linking: Theory Extension and Applications across Exams. Research Report. ETS RR-06-31

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Population Invariance of Test Equating and Linking: Theory Extension and Applications across Exams. Research Report. ETS RR-06-31
Language: English
Authors: von Davier, Alina A., Liu, Mei
Source: ETS Research Report Series. Oct 2006.
Availability: Educational Testing Service. Rosedale Road, MS19-R Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/ets
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 207
Publication Date: 2006
Document Type: Journal Articles
Collected Works - General
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis, Data Collection, Test Format, Item Response Theory, True Scores, Science Tests, Achievement Tests, Test Items, Advanced Placement Programs, Mathematics Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Law Schools
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: ACT Assessment, Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB), College Level Examination Program, Law School Admission Test, SAT (College Admission Test)
ISSN: 2330-8516
Abstract: This report builds on and extends existent research on population invariance to new tests and issues. The authors lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of the use of population invariance measures in a wide variety of practical contexts. The invariance of linear, equipercentile and IRT equating methods are examined using data from five testing programs--AP, ACT, the College-Level Examination Program® (CLEP®), LSAT, and the College Board's SAT® (SAT). The five papers in this report address a variety of issues. The SAT paper examines the role of the anchor test in achieving population invariance of linear equatings across male and female subpopulations and test administrations. The AP paper examines IRT models applied to exams with both multiple-choice and constructed-response components. The CLEP paper investigates population invariance of the 1-parameter IRT model applied to testlet-based computerized exams. The LSAT paper extends the application of population invariance methods to subpopulations defined by geographic region, whether examinees applied to law school, and their law school admission status. Finally, the ACT paper examines the population invariance of a science test across different ability groups using IRT true and observed score equating as well as equipercentile equating methods. The papers include: (1) Population Invariance of IRT True Score Equating (Alina A. von Davier and Christine Wilson); (2) Exploring the Population Sensitivity of Linking Functions across Test Administrations Using LSAT Subpopulations (Mei Liu and Paul W. Holland); (3) Invariance of Score Linkings Across Gender Groups for Forms of a Testlet-Based CLEP® Examination (Wen-Ling Yang and Rui Gao); (4) Invariance of Equating Functions across Different Subgroups of Examinees Taking a Science Achievement Test (Qing Yi, Deborah J. Harris, and Xiaohong Gao); and (5) The Role of the Anchor Test in Achieving Population Invariance across Subpopulations and Test Administrations (Neil J. Dorans, Jinghua Liu, and Shelby Hammond). The report concludes with: (1) A Discussion of Population Invariance of Equating (Nancy S. Petersen); and (2) A Discussion of Population Invariance (Robert L. Brennan). Individual papers contain references.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1111520
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1111520
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1111520
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Population Invariance of Test Equating and Linking: Theory Extension and Applications across Exams. Research Report. ETS RR-06-31
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22von+Davier%2C+Alina+A%2E%22">von Davier, Alina A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liu%2C+Mei%22">Liu, Mei</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22ETS+Research+Report+Series%22"><i>ETS Research Report Series</i></searchLink>. Oct 2006.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Educational Testing Service. Rosedale Road, MS19-R Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/ets
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 207
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2006
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Collected Works - General<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equated+Scores%22">Equated Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Format%22">Test Format</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Response+Theory%22">Item Response Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22True+Scores%22">True Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Tests%22">Science Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Tests%22">Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advanced+Placement+Programs%22">Advanced Placement Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Tests%22">Mathematics Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Entrance+Examinations%22">College Entrance Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Law+Schools%22">Law Schools</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22ACT+Assessment%22">ACT Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Advanced+Placement+Examinations+%28CEEB%29%22">Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22College+Level+Examination+Program%22">College Level Examination Program</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Law+School+Admission+Test%22">Law School Admission Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22SAT+%28College+Admission+Test%29%22">SAT (College Admission Test)</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2330-8516
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This report builds on and extends existent research on population invariance to new tests and issues. The authors lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of the use of population invariance measures in a wide variety of practical contexts. The invariance of linear, equipercentile and IRT equating methods are examined using data from five testing programs--AP, ACT, the College-Level Examination Program® (CLEP®), LSAT, and the College Board's SAT® (SAT). The five papers in this report address a variety of issues. The SAT paper examines the role of the anchor test in achieving population invariance of linear equatings across male and female subpopulations and test administrations. The AP paper examines IRT models applied to exams with both multiple-choice and constructed-response components. The CLEP paper investigates population invariance of the 1-parameter IRT model applied to testlet-based computerized exams. The LSAT paper extends the application of population invariance methods to subpopulations defined by geographic region, whether examinees applied to law school, and their law school admission status. Finally, the ACT paper examines the population invariance of a science test across different ability groups using IRT true and observed score equating as well as equipercentile equating methods. The papers include: (1) Population Invariance of IRT True Score Equating (Alina A. von Davier and Christine Wilson); (2) Exploring the Population Sensitivity of Linking Functions across Test Administrations Using LSAT Subpopulations (Mei Liu and Paul W. Holland); (3) Invariance of Score Linkings Across Gender Groups for Forms of a Testlet-Based CLEP® Examination (Wen-Ling Yang and Rui Gao); (4) Invariance of Equating Functions across Different Subgroups of Examinees Taking a Science Achievement Test (Qing Yi, Deborah J. Harris, and Xiaohong Gao); and (5) The Role of the Anchor Test in Achieving Population Invariance across Subpopulations and Test Administrations (Neil J. Dorans, Jinghua Liu, and Shelby Hammond). The report concludes with: (1) A Discussion of Population Invariance of Equating (Nancy S. Petersen); and (2) A Discussion of Population Invariance (Robert L. Brennan). Individual papers contain references.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1111520
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1111520
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 207
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Equated Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Collection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Format
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Item Response Theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: True Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Achievement Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Items
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Advanced Placement Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Entrance Examinations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Law Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: ACT Assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Level Examination Program
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Law School Admission Test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SAT (College Admission Test)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Population Invariance of Test Equating and Linking: Theory Extension and Applications across Exams. Research Report. ETS RR-06-31
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: von Davier, Alina A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liu, Mei
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Type: published
              Y: 2006
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2330-8516
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: ETS Research Report Series
              Type: main
ResultId 1