Attrition in Developmental Psychology: A Review of Modern Missing Data Reporting and Practices
Saved in:
| Title: | Attrition in Developmental Psychology: A Review of Modern Missing Data Reporting and Practices |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Nicholson, Jody S., Deboeck, Pascal R., Howard, Waylon |
| Source: | International Journal of Behavioral Development. Jan 2017 41(1):143-153. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Attrition (Research Studies), Developmental Psychology, Psychological Studies, Statistical Analysis, Bias, Data Analysis, Longitudinal Studies |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0165025415618275 |
| ISSN: | 0165-0254 |
| Abstract: | Inherent in applied developmental sciences is the threat to validity and generalizability due to missing data as a result of participant drop-out. The current paper provides an overview of how attrition should be reported, which tests can examine the potential of bias due to attrition (e.g., t-tests, logistic regression, Little's MCAR test, sensitivity analysis), and how it is best corrected through modern missing data analyses. To amend this discussion of best practices in managing and reporting attrition, an assessment of how developmental sciences currently handle attrition was conducted. Longitudinal studies (n = 541) published from 2009-2012 in major developmental journals were reviewed for attrition reporting practices and how authors handled missing data based on recommendations in the "Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association" (APA, 2010). Results suggest attrition reporting is not following APA recommendations, quality of reporting did not improve since the APA publication, and a low proportion of authors provided sufficient information to convey that data properly met the MAR assumption. An example based on simulated data demonstrates bias that may result from various missing data mechanisms in longitudinal data, the utility of auxiliary variables for the MAR assumption, and the need for viewing missingness along a continuum from MAR to MNAR. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 56 |
| Entry Date: | 2016 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1124386 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1124386 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Attrition in Developmental Psychology: A Review of Modern Missing Data Reporting and Practices – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nicholson%2C+Jody+S%2E%22">Nicholson, Jody S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deboeck%2C+Pascal+R%2E%22">Deboeck, Pascal R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Howard%2C+Waylon%22">Howard, Waylon</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Behavioral+Development%22"><i>International Journal of Behavioral Development</i></searchLink>. Jan 2017 41(1):143-153. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attrition+%28Research+Studies%29%22">Attrition (Research Studies)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Developmental+Psychology%22">Developmental Psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Studies%22">Psychological Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bias%22">Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Analysis%22">Data Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+Studies%22">Longitudinal Studies</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/0165025415618275 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0165-0254 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Inherent in applied developmental sciences is the threat to validity and generalizability due to missing data as a result of participant drop-out. The current paper provides an overview of how attrition should be reported, which tests can examine the potential of bias due to attrition (e.g., t-tests, logistic regression, Little's MCAR test, sensitivity analysis), and how it is best corrected through modern missing data analyses. To amend this discussion of best practices in managing and reporting attrition, an assessment of how developmental sciences currently handle attrition was conducted. Longitudinal studies (n = 541) published from 2009-2012 in major developmental journals were reviewed for attrition reporting practices and how authors handled missing data based on recommendations in the "Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association" (APA, 2010). Results suggest attrition reporting is not following APA recommendations, quality of reporting did not improve since the APA publication, and a low proportion of authors provided sufficient information to convey that data properly met the MAR assumption. An example based on simulated data demonstrates bias that may result from various missing data mechanisms in longitudinal data, the utility of auxiliary variables for the MAR assumption, and the need for viewing missingness along a continuum from MAR to MNAR. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 56 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2016 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1124386 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1124386 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/0165025415618275 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 143 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Attrition (Research Studies) Type: general – SubjectFull: Developmental Psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal Studies Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Attrition in Developmental Psychology: A Review of Modern Missing Data Reporting and Practices Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nicholson, Jody S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deboeck, Pascal R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Howard, Waylon IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2017 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0165-0254 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 41 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Behavioral Development Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |