Effect of Group versus Individual Assessments on Coursework among Undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for Continuous Assessments in Universities
Saved in:
| Title: | Effect of Group versus Individual Assessments on Coursework among Undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for Continuous Assessments in Universities |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mbalamula, Yazidu Saidi |
| Source: | Pedagogical Research. Feb 2018 3(1). |
| Availability: | Lectito Journals. Wassenaarseweb 20, 2596 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands. Tel: 31-70-2190600; e-mail: info@lectitojournals.com; Web site: http://www.lectitopublishing.nl |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Formative Evaluation, Academic Achievement, Case Studies, Statistical Analysis, Correlation, Multiple Regression Analysis, Course Descriptions, Individual Testing, Group Testing |
| Geographic Terms: | Tanzania |
| ISSN: | 2468-4929 |
| Abstract: | The study analyzes students' performance scores in formative assessments depicting the individual and group settings. A case study design was adopted using quantitative approach to extract data of 198 undergraduate students. Data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics--means and frequencies; spearman correlations, multiple regression and independent sample t-test. The findings show students perform better in groups than in individual settings as evidenced by weak and negative monotonic correlation between test scores and randomized group assessment scores (r[subscript s] = -0.318, p < 0.000). Further, students' scores in randomized groups increased with increase in number of members in a group. Moreover, both tests and group assignments had statistically significant effect on coursework scores; however, the scores from randomized groups had the highest effect on coursework (R[superscript 2]= 0.186). The results confirm that randomized group assessments are better than students' chosen referenced group assignments, though both being commendable than individual tests. The study recommends more studies in all assessment categories reflecting on group and individual settings to broaden an understanding of learning assessments efficacy in universities. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 30 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1171114 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1171114 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1171114 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Effect of Group versus Individual Assessments on Coursework among Undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for Continuous Assessments in Universities – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mbalamula%2C+Yazidu+Saidi%22">Mbalamula, Yazidu Saidi</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Pedagogical+Research%22"><i>Pedagogical Research</i></searchLink>. Feb 2018 3(1). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Lectito Journals. Wassenaarseweb 20, 2596 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands. Tel: 31-70-2190600; e-mail: info@lectitojournals.com; Web site: http://www.lectitopublishing.nl – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Regression+Analysis%22">Multiple Regression Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Descriptions%22">Course Descriptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Testing%22">Individual Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Testing%22">Group Testing</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tanzania%22">Tanzania</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2468-4929 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The study analyzes students' performance scores in formative assessments depicting the individual and group settings. A case study design was adopted using quantitative approach to extract data of 198 undergraduate students. Data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics--means and frequencies; spearman correlations, multiple regression and independent sample t-test. The findings show students perform better in groups than in individual settings as evidenced by weak and negative monotonic correlation between test scores and randomized group assessment scores (r[subscript s] = -0.318, p < 0.000). Further, students' scores in randomized groups increased with increase in number of members in a group. Moreover, both tests and group assignments had statistically significant effect on coursework scores; however, the scores from randomized groups had the highest effect on coursework (R[superscript 2]= 0.186). The results confirm that randomized group assessments are better than students' chosen referenced group assignments, though both being commendable than individual tests. The study recommends more studies in all assessment categories reflecting on group and individual settings to broaden an understanding of learning assessments efficacy in universities. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 30 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1171114 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1171114 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple Regression Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Course Descriptions Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Tanzania Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Effect of Group versus Individual Assessments on Coursework among Undergraduates in Tanzania: Implications for Continuous Assessments in Universities Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mbalamula, Yazidu Saidi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2468-4929 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 3 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Pedagogical Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |