Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques
Saved in:
| Title: | Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2018 8(1):17-33. |
| Availability: | Journal of Technology and Science Education. ESEIAAT, Department of Projectes d'Enginyeria c/Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa, Spain. e-mail: info@jotse.org; e-mail: info@omniascience.com; Web site: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Program Administration, Student Projects, Scheduling, Engineering, Engineering Education, Goodness of Fit, Models, Program Length, Program Evaluation, Critical Path Method, Case Studies |
| ISSN: | 2014-5349 |
| Abstract: | Many engineering projects fail to meet their planned completion dates in real practice. This is a recurrent topic in the project management literature, with poor planning and controlling practices frequently cited among the most significant causes of delays. Unfortunately, hardly any attention has been paid to the fact that the classical scheduling techniques--Gantt chart, Critical Path Method (CPM), and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)--may not be as fit for purpose as they seem. Arguably, because of their relative simplicity, these techniques are still almost the only ones taught nowadays in most introductory courses to scheduling in many engineering and management degrees. However, by utterly ignoring or inappropriately dealing with activity duration variability, these techniques provide optimistic completion dates, while suffering from other shortcomings. Through a series of simple case studies that can be developed with a few participants and common dice, a systematic critique of the classical scheduling techniques is offered. Discussion of the case studies results illustrate why limiting the contents of scheduling education and teaching can be detrimental, as the aforementioned classical scheduling techniques cannot not provide project managers with sufficient resources to effectively plan and control real projects. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 61 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1173811 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1173811 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1173811 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ballesteros-Pérez%2C+Pablo%22">Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-9664">0000-0002-4629-9664</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larsen%2C+Graeme+D%2E%22">Larsen, Graeme D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-5074">0000-0003-4992-5074</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22González-Cruz%2C+Maria+C%2E%22">González-Cruz, Maria C.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6987-5732">0000-0002-6987-5732</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Technology+and+Science+Education%22"><i>Journal of Technology and Science Education</i></searchLink>. 2018 8(1):17-33. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Journal of Technology and Science Education. ESEIAAT, Department of Projectes d'Enginyeria c/Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa, Spain. e-mail: info@jotse.org; e-mail: info@omniascience.com; Web site: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Administration%22">Program Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scheduling%22">Scheduling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goodness+of+Fit%22">Goodness of Fit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Length%22">Program Length</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+Path+Method%22">Critical Path Method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2014-5349 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Many engineering projects fail to meet their planned completion dates in real practice. This is a recurrent topic in the project management literature, with poor planning and controlling practices frequently cited among the most significant causes of delays. Unfortunately, hardly any attention has been paid to the fact that the classical scheduling techniques--Gantt chart, Critical Path Method (CPM), and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)--may not be as fit for purpose as they seem. Arguably, because of their relative simplicity, these techniques are still almost the only ones taught nowadays in most introductory courses to scheduling in many engineering and management degrees. However, by utterly ignoring or inappropriately dealing with activity duration variability, these techniques provide optimistic completion dates, while suffering from other shortcomings. Through a series of simple case studies that can be developed with a few participants and common dice, a systematic critique of the classical scheduling techniques is offered. Discussion of the case studies results illustrate why limiting the contents of scheduling education and teaching can be detrimental, as the aforementioned classical scheduling techniques cannot not provide project managers with sufficient resources to effectively plan and control real projects. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 61 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1173811 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1173811 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 17 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Program Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Projects Type: general – SubjectFull: Scheduling Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Goodness of Fit Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Length Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Critical Path Method Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Larsen, Graeme D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: González-Cruz, Maria C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2014-5349 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Technology and Science Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |