Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques
Language: English
Authors: Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo (ORCID 0000-0002-4629-9664), Larsen, Graeme D. (ORCID 0000-0003-4992-5074), González-Cruz, Maria C. (ORCID 0000-0002-6987-5732)
Source: Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2018 8(1):17-33.
Availability: Journal of Technology and Science Education. ESEIAAT, Department of Projectes d'Enginyeria c/Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa, Spain. e-mail: info@jotse.org; e-mail: info@omniascience.com; Web site: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2018
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Program Administration, Student Projects, Scheduling, Engineering, Engineering Education, Goodness of Fit, Models, Program Length, Program Evaluation, Critical Path Method, Case Studies
ISSN: 2014-5349
Abstract: Many engineering projects fail to meet their planned completion dates in real practice. This is a recurrent topic in the project management literature, with poor planning and controlling practices frequently cited among the most significant causes of delays. Unfortunately, hardly any attention has been paid to the fact that the classical scheduling techniques--Gantt chart, Critical Path Method (CPM), and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)--may not be as fit for purpose as they seem. Arguably, because of their relative simplicity, these techniques are still almost the only ones taught nowadays in most introductory courses to scheduling in many engineering and management degrees. However, by utterly ignoring or inappropriately dealing with activity duration variability, these techniques provide optimistic completion dates, while suffering from other shortcomings. Through a series of simple case studies that can be developed with a few participants and common dice, a systematic critique of the classical scheduling techniques is offered. Discussion of the case studies results illustrate why limiting the contents of scheduling education and teaching can be detrimental, as the aforementioned classical scheduling techniques cannot not provide project managers with sufficient resources to effectively plan and control real projects.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 61
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: EJ1173811
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1173811
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1173811
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ballesteros-Pérez%2C+Pablo%22">Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-9664">0000-0002-4629-9664</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larsen%2C+Graeme+D%2E%22">Larsen, Graeme D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-5074">0000-0003-4992-5074</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22González-Cruz%2C+Maria+C%2E%22">González-Cruz, Maria C.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6987-5732">0000-0002-6987-5732</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Technology+and+Science+Education%22"><i>Journal of Technology and Science Education</i></searchLink>. 2018 8(1):17-33.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Journal of Technology and Science Education. ESEIAAT, Department of Projectes d'Enginyeria c/Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa, Spain. e-mail: info@jotse.org; e-mail: info@omniascience.com; Web site: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 17
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Administration%22">Program Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scheduling%22">Scheduling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goodness+of+Fit%22">Goodness of Fit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Length%22">Program Length</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+Path+Method%22">Critical Path Method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2014-5349
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Many engineering projects fail to meet their planned completion dates in real practice. This is a recurrent topic in the project management literature, with poor planning and controlling practices frequently cited among the most significant causes of delays. Unfortunately, hardly any attention has been paid to the fact that the classical scheduling techniques--Gantt chart, Critical Path Method (CPM), and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)--may not be as fit for purpose as they seem. Arguably, because of their relative simplicity, these techniques are still almost the only ones taught nowadays in most introductory courses to scheduling in many engineering and management degrees. However, by utterly ignoring or inappropriately dealing with activity duration variability, these techniques provide optimistic completion dates, while suffering from other shortcomings. Through a series of simple case studies that can be developed with a few participants and common dice, a systematic critique of the classical scheduling techniques is offered. Discussion of the case studies results illustrate why limiting the contents of scheduling education and teaching can be detrimental, as the aforementioned classical scheduling techniques cannot not provide project managers with sufficient resources to effectively plan and control real projects.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 61
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1173811
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1173811
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 17
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Program Administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scheduling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Goodness of Fit
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Length
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical Path Method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Case Studies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Larsen, Graeme D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: González-Cruz, Maria C.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2014-5349
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 8
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Technology and Science Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1