View in EDS

Readers' Selective Recall of Source Features as a Function of Claim Discrepancy and Task Demands

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Readers' Selective Recall of Source Features as a Function of Claim Discrepancy and Task Demands
Language: English
Authors: Saux, Gaston (ORCID 0000-0002-8482-6939), Ros, Christine, Britt, M. Anne, Stadtler, Marc, Burin, Debora I., Rouet, Jean-François
Source: Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2018 55(5-6):525-544.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2018
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Reading, Undergraduate Students, Information Sources, Reliability, Foreign Countries, Statistical Analysis
Geographic Terms: France
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
ISSN: 0163-853X
Abstract: In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants' memory for the sources' identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source's physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (n = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (n = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources' knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources' age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source's knowledgeability over appearance.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 38
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: EJ1184443
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1184443
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Readers' Selective Recall of Source Features as a Function of Claim Discrepancy and Task Demands
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Saux%2C+Gaston%22">Saux, Gaston</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8482-6939">0000-0002-8482-6939</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ros%2C+Christine%22">Ros, Christine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Britt%2C+M%2E+Anne%22">Britt, M. Anne</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stadtler%2C+Marc%22">Stadtler, Marc</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burin%2C+Debora+I%2E%22">Burin, Debora I.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rouet%2C+Jean-François%22">Rouet, Jean-François</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Discourse+Processes%3A+A+Multidisciplinary+Journal%22"><i>Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal</i></searchLink>. 2018 55(5-6):525-544.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading%22">Reading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Sources%22">Information Sources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability%22">Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22France%22">France</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0163-853X
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In two experiments, undergraduate students read short texts containing two embedded sources that could either agree or disagree with each other. Participants' memory for the sources' identity (i.e., occupation) and features (i.e., the source's access to knowledge and the source's physical appearance) was examined as a function of the consistency of their assertions. In Experiment 1 (n = 64), sources were described with only one feature (knowledge or appearance), whereas in Experiment 2 (n = 62), each source was described with both features. Experiment 1 additionally tested the influence of two different tasks during reading (an evaluation of sources' knowledgeability vs. an evaluation of sources' age). Consistent with our predictions, knowledge evaluations (Experiment 1) and discrepant claims (Experiments 1 and 2) enhanced memory for sources and their features. Experiment 2 also showed that when both types of features were available, discrepant claims selectively benefited memory for a source's knowledgeability over appearance.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 38
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1184443
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1184443
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 525
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information Sources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: France
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Readers' Selective Recall of Source Features as a Function of Claim Discrepancy and Task Demands
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Saux, Gaston
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ros, Christine
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Britt, M. Anne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stadtler, Marc
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burin, Debora I.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rouet, Jean-François
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0163-853X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 55
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5-6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1