Relationships between Public Health Faculty and Decision Makers at Four Governmental Levels: A Social Network Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | Relationships between Public Health Faculty and Decision Makers at Four Governmental Levels: A Social Network Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jessani, Nasreen S., Babcock, Carly, Siddiqi, Sameer, Davey-Rothwell, Melissa, Ho, Shirley, Holtgrave, David R. |
| Source: | Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Aug 2018 14(3):499-522. |
| Availability: | Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 24 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | College Faculty, Social Networks, Network Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Decision Making, Public Health, School Community Relationship, Local Government, State Government, Federal Government, International Cooperation |
| Geographic Terms: | Maryland (Baltimore) |
| DOI: | 10.1332/174426418X15230282334424 |
| ISSN: | 1744-2648 |
| Abstract: | Background: Relationships between academic faculty and decision makers have been documented as an important factor in the evidence-to-policy process. However, knowledge about the breadth, depth and dynamic quality of these relationships often remains unknown therefore rendering the potential for influence untapped, uncoordinated, redundant or inefficient. Methods: We mapped the relationships between faculty at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and decision makers at the city, state, federal and global levels. In 2016, 211 of 627 eligible full-time faculty participated in a sociometric survey. Common metrics for social network analysis were modified to provide reliable indicators of network characteristics. UCINet was used for network visualisation. 'Highly connected' individuals included: faculty with =5 contacts at any one government level; those appearing in the top 10% in total across all four levels; decision makers appearing in the top 2% of frequently mentioned people. Results: Results revealed faculty relationships spanning >100 government departments, ~700 decision makers, and 45 country governments. The majority of respondents (72%) mentioned at least one decision maker; 49 faculty and 24 decision makers appeared as 'highly connected'. While the School of Public Health (SPH) demonstrates a diversity of relationships within and across government agencies, there were also identifiable gaps. Conclusion: This study provides further support for using Network Analysis to explore size, reach, diversity and density of relationships between academic faculty and decision makers, with network maps serving as a proxy for potential influence. Academic institutions and government agencies should nurture a variety of relationships in order to enhance engaged scholarship and further informed decision making. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1191155 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1191155 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Relationships between Public Health Faculty and Decision Makers at Four Governmental Levels: A Social Network Analysis – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jessani%2C+Nasreen+S%2E%22">Jessani, Nasreen S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Babcock%2C+Carly%22">Babcock, Carly</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Siddiqi%2C+Sameer%22">Siddiqi, Sameer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davey-Rothwell%2C+Melissa%22">Davey-Rothwell, Melissa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ho%2C+Shirley%22">Ho, Shirley</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holtgrave%2C+David+R%2E%22">Holtgrave, David R.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Evidence+%26+Policy%3A+A+Journal+of+Research%2C+Debate+and+Practice%22"><i>Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice</i></searchLink>. Aug 2018 14(3):499-522. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 24 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Networks%22">Social Networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Network+Analysis%22">Network Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+Relationship%22">Interpersonal Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Health%22">Public Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Community+Relationship%22">School Community Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Local+Government%22">Local Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Government%22">State Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Government%22">Federal Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+Cooperation%22">International Cooperation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maryland+%28Baltimore%29%22">Maryland (Baltimore)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1332/174426418X15230282334424 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1744-2648 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Relationships between academic faculty and decision makers have been documented as an important factor in the evidence-to-policy process. However, knowledge about the breadth, depth and dynamic quality of these relationships often remains unknown therefore rendering the potential for influence untapped, uncoordinated, redundant or inefficient. Methods: We mapped the relationships between faculty at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and decision makers at the city, state, federal and global levels. In 2016, 211 of 627 eligible full-time faculty participated in a sociometric survey. Common metrics for social network analysis were modified to provide reliable indicators of network characteristics. UCINet was used for network visualisation. 'Highly connected' individuals included: faculty with =5 contacts at any one government level; those appearing in the top 10% in total across all four levels; decision makers appearing in the top 2% of frequently mentioned people. Results: Results revealed faculty relationships spanning >100 government departments, ~700 decision makers, and 45 country governments. The majority of respondents (72%) mentioned at least one decision maker; 49 faculty and 24 decision makers appeared as 'highly connected'. While the School of Public Health (SPH) demonstrates a diversity of relationships within and across government agencies, there were also identifiable gaps. Conclusion: This study provides further support for using Network Analysis to explore size, reach, diversity and density of relationships between academic faculty and decision makers, with network maps serving as a proxy for potential influence. Academic institutions and government agencies should nurture a variety of relationships in order to enhance engaged scholarship and further informed decision making. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1191155 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1191155 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1332/174426418X15230282334424 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 StartPage: 499 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Networks Type: general – SubjectFull: Network Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Health Type: general – SubjectFull: School Community Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Local Government Type: general – SubjectFull: State Government Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Government Type: general – SubjectFull: International Cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Maryland (Baltimore) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Relationships between Public Health Faculty and Decision Makers at Four Governmental Levels: A Social Network Analysis Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jessani, Nasreen S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Babcock, Carly – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Siddiqi, Sameer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Davey-Rothwell, Melissa – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ho, Shirley – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holtgrave, David R. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1744-2648 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |