Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement
Saved in:
| Title: | Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Nolen, Susan Bobbitt (ORCID |
| Source: | IEEE Transactions on Education. Aug 2018 61(3):226-233. |
| Availability: | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel: 732-981-0060; Web site: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=13 |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | DRL1251264 DRL1251866 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Laboratories, Engineering Education, Student Motivation, Learner Engagement, Simulated Environment, Computer Simulation, Student Interests, Teaching Methods, Teamwork, Transfer of Training, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TE.2018.2791445 |
| ISSN: | 0018-9359 |
| Abstract: | Contribution: Student engagement and interest in engineering is compared between virtual and physical laboratory projects, designed to be realistic and replicate engineering practice. Reported motivation and engagement was greater in the virtual project than the physical projects. Results are interpreted in terms of the different affordances for instructional design using physical and virtual laboratories. Background: Interest is increasing in incorporating virtual laboratories in engineering curricula. Numerous studies report equal or greater gains in students' conceptual understanding in a virtual laboratory than a corresponding physical laboratory, but many researchers question if virtual laboratories can stimulate the same level of excitement for engineering as physical laboratories. Research Questions: Do students' self-reports of interest in engineering depend on the instructional design afforded by the laboratory mode? How do instructional designs of virtual and physical laboratory projects relate to students' perceptions of engagement, their contribution to the team, and the transfer of prior coursework to meet project objectives? Method: In a within-subjects design, 118 students' interest and engagement in two physical laboratory projects and one of two virtual laboratory projects in a senior-year capstone course is investigated. Separate principal components analyses were used to develop reliable scales for interest and for engagement. Findings: Students reported greater engagement, perceptions of contribution to their group's learning, opportunities to transfer prior learning from coursework, and end-of-course interest in engineering problem solving in the virtual laboratory project rather than the physical laboratory projects. The positive outcomes are connected to instructional design through the affordances of the virtual laboratory. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 46 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1192585 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1192585 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nolen%2C+Susan+Bobbitt%22">Nolen, Susan Bobbitt</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-4447">0000-0003-2240-4447</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koretsky%2C+Milo+D%2E%22">Koretsky, Milo D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-4527">0000-0002-6887-4527</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22IEEE+Transactions+on+Education%22"><i>IEEE Transactions on Education</i></searchLink>. Aug 2018 61(3):226-233. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel: 732-981-0060; Web site: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=13 – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: DRL1251264<br />DRL1251866 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Laboratories%22">Laboratories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Motivation%22">Student Motivation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Simulated+Environment%22">Simulated Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Simulation%22">Computer Simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Interests%22">Student Interests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teamwork%22">Teamwork</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transfer+of+Training%22">Transfer of Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1109/TE.2018.2791445 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0018-9359 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Contribution: Student engagement and interest in engineering is compared between virtual and physical laboratory projects, designed to be realistic and replicate engineering practice. Reported motivation and engagement was greater in the virtual project than the physical projects. Results are interpreted in terms of the different affordances for instructional design using physical and virtual laboratories. Background: Interest is increasing in incorporating virtual laboratories in engineering curricula. Numerous studies report equal or greater gains in students' conceptual understanding in a virtual laboratory than a corresponding physical laboratory, but many researchers question if virtual laboratories can stimulate the same level of excitement for engineering as physical laboratories. Research Questions: Do students' self-reports of interest in engineering depend on the instructional design afforded by the laboratory mode? How do instructional designs of virtual and physical laboratory projects relate to students' perceptions of engagement, their contribution to the team, and the transfer of prior coursework to meet project objectives? Method: In a within-subjects design, 118 students' interest and engagement in two physical laboratory projects and one of two virtual laboratory projects in a senior-year capstone course is investigated. Separate principal components analyses were used to develop reliable scales for interest and for engagement. Findings: Students reported greater engagement, perceptions of contribution to their group's learning, opportunities to transfer prior learning from coursework, and end-of-course interest in engineering problem solving in the virtual laboratory project rather than the physical laboratory projects. The positive outcomes are connected to instructional design through the affordances of the virtual laboratory. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 46 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1192585 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1192585 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1109/TE.2018.2791445 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 226 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Laboratories Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Motivation Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general – SubjectFull: Simulated Environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Simulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Interests Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Teamwork Type: general – SubjectFull: Transfer of Training Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nolen, Susan Bobbitt – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Koretsky, Milo D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0018-9359 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 61 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: IEEE Transactions on Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |