View in EDS

Named into Being? Language Questions and the Politics of Scots in the 2011 Census in Scotland

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Named into Being? Language Questions and the Politics of Scots in the 2011 Census in Scotland
Language: English
Authors: Sebba, Mark (ORCID 0000-0001-5607-9561)
Source: Language Policy. Aug 2019 18(3):339-362.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 24
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Political Issues, Language Planning, Foreign Countries, Census Figures, Ideology, Political Attitudes, Indo European Languages, Language Attitudes, Dialects, English, Public Policy, Language Usage, Language Maintenance, History, Native Speakers, Language Variation
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom (Scotland)
DOI: 10.1007/s10993-018-9488-0
ISSN: 1568-4555
Abstract: Where censuses are concerned, politics and ideology are pervasive. The 2011 census in Scotland (a semi-autonomous part of the United Kingdom) was the first to ask a question about Scots, a close relative of English, which is historically the vernacular in many parts of Scotland. While at one time Scots had high status as the national language of Scotland, it is now widely regarded as a 'dialect' of English, and for many people it has associations of inferiority. At the same time, it has political relevance because of its potential to be an important cultural marker for an autonomous Scotland. The policy position of the current Scottish government, which advocates independence, is to protect and celebrate Scots. Adding a question about Scots to the census was an attempt to advance this by finding out who and where the users of Scots are. Research carried out before the census had shown that the public had differing ideas about what could be called Scots and whether it was, in fact, a different language from English: according to one previous survey, 64% did not think of it as a language at all. Given this background it is unsurprising that interpretations of the census results were controversial, reflecting to some degree existing language ideologies. According to some, the census provided no useful information, while according to others it demonstrated that there was a robust Scots-speaking population and a clear public understanding of what it meant to be a speaker of Scots. This paper discusses the history and political background to the problematic language questions in the Scottish census, and how the choice of questions, their wording and even their order on the questionnaire may have affected the results. Despite the flawed questions and many difficulties of interpretation, it seems that the 2011 census, whether or not it succeeded in enumerating accurately the speakers of Scots, may nevertheless have helped to raise public awareness of the language and to legitimise it. There are lessons to be learnt from the Scottish census, too, in other situations around the world where there are unclear boundaries between 'language' and 'dialect,' or where low-status and high-status varieties of 'the same' language coexist.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: EJ1221466
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1221466
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Named into Being? Language Questions and the Politics of Scots in the 2011 Census in Scotland
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sebba%2C+Mark%22">Sebba, Mark</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5607-9561">0000-0001-5607-9561</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Policy%22"><i>Language Policy</i></searchLink>. Aug 2019 18(3):339-362.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 24
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+Issues%22">Political Issues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Planning%22">Language Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Census+Figures%22">Census Figures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ideology%22">Ideology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+Attitudes%22">Political Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indo+European+Languages%22">Indo European Languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Attitudes%22">Language Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dialects%22">Dialects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English%22">English</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Maintenance%22">Language Maintenance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22History%22">History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Native+Speakers%22">Native Speakers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Variation%22">Language Variation</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom+%28Scotland%29%22">United Kingdom (Scotland)</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s10993-018-9488-0
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1568-4555
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Where censuses are concerned, politics and ideology are pervasive. The 2011 census in Scotland (a semi-autonomous part of the United Kingdom) was the first to ask a question about Scots, a close relative of English, which is historically the vernacular in many parts of Scotland. While at one time Scots had high status as the national language of Scotland, it is now widely regarded as a 'dialect' of English, and for many people it has associations of inferiority. At the same time, it has political relevance because of its potential to be an important cultural marker for an autonomous Scotland. The policy position of the current Scottish government, which advocates independence, is to protect and celebrate Scots. Adding a question about Scots to the census was an attempt to advance this by finding out who and where the users of Scots are. Research carried out before the census had shown that the public had differing ideas about what could be called Scots and whether it was, in fact, a different language from English: according to one previous survey, 64% did not think of it as a language at all. Given this background it is unsurprising that interpretations of the census results were controversial, reflecting to some degree existing language ideologies. According to some, the census provided no useful information, while according to others it demonstrated that there was a robust Scots-speaking population and a clear public understanding of what it meant to be a speaker of Scots. This paper discusses the history and political background to the problematic language questions in the Scottish census, and how the choice of questions, their wording and even their order on the questionnaire may have affected the results. Despite the flawed questions and many difficulties of interpretation, it seems that the 2011 census, whether or not it succeeded in enumerating accurately the speakers of Scots, may nevertheless have helped to raise public awareness of the language and to legitimise it. There are lessons to be learnt from the Scottish census, too, in other situations around the world where there are unclear boundaries between 'language' and 'dialect,' or where low-status and high-status varieties of 'the same' language coexist.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1221466
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1221466
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10993-018-9488-0
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 24
        StartPage: 339
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Political Issues
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Census Figures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ideology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Indo European Languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dialects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Usage
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Maintenance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: History
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Native Speakers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Variation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom (Scotland)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Named into Being? Language Questions and the Politics of Scots in the 2011 Census in Scotland
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sebba, Mark
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1568-4555
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 18
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Language Policy
              Type: main
ResultId 1