Field Independence Associates with Mathematics and Science Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Olds after Accounting for Domain-General Factors

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Field Independence Associates with Mathematics and Science Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Olds after Accounting for Domain-General Factors
Language: English
Authors: Morris, Su (ORCID 0000-0002-6804-9682), Farran, Emily K., Dumontheil, Iroise
Source: Mind, Brain, and Education. Nov 2019 13(4):268-278.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Mathematics Tests, Intelligence, Verbal Ability, Short Term Memory, Science Tests, Academic Achievement, Predictor Variables, Correlation, Elementary School Students, Thinking Skills, Tests
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Childrens Embedded Figures Test
DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12214
ISSN: 1751-2271
Abstract: Field independence describes the extent to which individuals are influenced by context when trying to identify embedded targets. It associates with cognitive functioning and is a predictor of academic achievement. However, little is known about the neural and cognitive underpinnings of field independence that lead to these associations. Here, we investigated behavioral associations between two measures of field independence (Children's Embedded Figures Test [CEFT] and Design Organization Test [DOT]) and performance on tests of mathematics (reasoning and written arithmetic) and science (reasoning and scientific inquiry) in 135 children aged 5-10 years. There were strong associations between field independence and mathematics and science, which were largely explained by individual differences in age, intelligence, and verbal working memory. However, regression analyses indicated that after controlling for these variables, the CEFT explained additional variance on the mathematical reasoning and science tests, whereas the DOT predicted unique variance on the written arithmetic test.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: EJ1234989
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Field independence describes the extent to which individuals are influenced by context when trying to identify embedded targets. It associates with cognitive functioning and is a predictor of academic achievement. However, little is known about the neural and cognitive underpinnings of field independence that lead to these associations. Here, we investigated behavioral associations between two measures of field independence (Children's Embedded Figures Test [CEFT] and Design Organization Test [DOT]) and performance on tests of mathematics (reasoning and written arithmetic) and science (reasoning and scientific inquiry) in 135 children aged 5-10 years. There were strong associations between field independence and mathematics and science, which were largely explained by individual differences in age, intelligence, and verbal working memory. However, regression analyses indicated that after controlling for these variables, the CEFT explained additional variance on the mathematical reasoning and science tests, whereas the DOT predicted unique variance on the written arithmetic test.
ISSN:1751-2271
DOI:10.1111/mbe.12214