Grade 11 Students' Proof Construction Ability in Relation to Classroom Resources

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Grade 11 Students' Proof Construction Ability in Relation to Classroom Resources
Language: English
Authors: Shongwe, Benjamin
Source: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2020 15(2).
Availability: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Suite 124, Challenge House 616 Mitcham Road, CR0 3AA, Croydon, London, UK. Tel: +44-208-936-7681; e-mail: iejme@iejme.com; Web site: https://www.iejme.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Grade 11
High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Grade 11, Secondary School Mathematics, Mathematical Logic, Validity, Secondary School Students, Educational Resources, Mathematics Instruction, Teaching Methods, Foreign Countries, Textbooks, Educational Technology, Gender Differences, Age Differences, Institutional Characteristics, Racial Differences, Socioeconomic Status
Geographic Terms: South Africa
ISSN: 1306-3030
Abstract: Despite proof being fundamental to the mathematics discipline and its role as a means to convey mathematical content, little is known about the effect of resources on influencing students' proof construction ability. The purpose of this study was to compare two didactic environments, one regarded as resourced (favored) and the other under-resourced (disadvantaged), in relation to the construction of a mathematical proof. Motivated by the discrepancies in the literature on the influence of school resources on students' performance and the unfortunately prevalent view that the sole function of proof in mathematics is verification by using confirmatory cases, this study sought to examine the differences (if any) between resourced and under-resourced classrooms in relation to students' proof construction ability. To this end, data were drawn from a proof-related task performed by 78 Grade 11 students in the Ethekwini Metropolitan area, South Africa. A modified version of the Proof Construction Assessment tool showed that students in resourced schools significantly performed better than those in under-resourced schools in relation to proof construction. In addition, there was an observable and noticeable effect of this. Specifically, at an alpha = 0.05, the t-test for independent means revealed a significant difference between the two groups, t(76) = 2.749, p < 0.01, d = 0.624 SD. The practical significance of the results emphasizes the importance of taking into account the role of resources when investigating the learning and teaching of proofs. Further, preliminary results also suggested that most students struggled to even begin to prove the proposition. Recommendations and implications for the students' careers and future research are raised and discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: EJ1235398
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1235398
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1235398
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Grade 11 Students&#39; Proof Construction Ability in Relation to Classroom Resources
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Shongwe%2C+Benjamin%22&quot;&gt;Shongwe, Benjamin&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;SO&quot; term=&quot;%22International+Electronic+Journal+of+Mathematics+Education%22&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 2020 15(2).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Suite 124, Challenge House 616 Mitcham Road, CR0 3AA, Croydon, London, UK. Tel: +44-208-936-7681; e-mail: iejme@iejme.com; Web site: https://www.iejme.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles&lt;br /&gt;Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Grade+11%22&quot;&gt;Grade 11&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22High+Schools%22&quot;&gt;High Schools&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Secondary+Education%22&quot;&gt;Secondary Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Grade+11%22&quot;&gt;Grade 11&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Secondary+School+Mathematics%22&quot;&gt;Secondary School Mathematics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Mathematical+Logic%22&quot;&gt;Mathematical Logic&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Validity%22&quot;&gt;Validity&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Secondary+School+Students%22&quot;&gt;Secondary School Students&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Educational+Resources%22&quot;&gt;Educational Resources&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Mathematics+Instruction%22&quot;&gt;Mathematics Instruction&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Teaching+Methods%22&quot;&gt;Teaching Methods&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Foreign+Countries%22&quot;&gt;Foreign Countries&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Textbooks%22&quot;&gt;Textbooks&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Educational+Technology%22&quot;&gt;Educational Technology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Gender+Differences%22&quot;&gt;Gender Differences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Age+Differences%22&quot;&gt;Age Differences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Institutional+Characteristics%22&quot;&gt;Institutional Characteristics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Racial+Differences%22&quot;&gt;Racial Differences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Socioeconomic+Status%22&quot;&gt;Socioeconomic Status&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22South+Africa%22&quot;&gt;South Africa&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1306-3030
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Despite proof being fundamental to the mathematics discipline and its role as a means to convey mathematical content, little is known about the effect of resources on influencing students&#39; proof construction ability. The purpose of this study was to compare two didactic environments, one regarded as resourced (favored) and the other under-resourced (disadvantaged), in relation to the construction of a mathematical proof. Motivated by the discrepancies in the literature on the influence of school resources on students&#39; performance and the unfortunately prevalent view that the sole function of proof in mathematics is verification by using confirmatory cases, this study sought to examine the differences (if any) between resourced and under-resourced classrooms in relation to students&#39; proof construction ability. To this end, data were drawn from a proof-related task performed by 78 Grade 11 students in the Ethekwini Metropolitan area, South Africa. A modified version of the Proof Construction Assessment tool showed that students in resourced schools significantly performed better than those in under-resourced schools in relation to proof construction. In addition, there was an observable and noticeable effect of this. Specifically, at an alpha = 0.05, the t-test for independent means revealed a significant difference between the two groups, t(76) = 2.749, p &lt; 0.01, d = 0.624 SD. The practical significance of the results emphasizes the importance of taking into account the role of resources when investigating the learning and teaching of proofs. Further, preliminary results also suggested that most students struggled to even begin to prove the proposition. Recommendations and implications for the students&#39; careers and future research are raised and discussed.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2019
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1235398
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1235398
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Grade 11
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Mathematics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical Logic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Resources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Textbooks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Age Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Racial Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Socioeconomic Status
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: South Africa
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Grade 11 Students' Proof Construction Ability in Relation to Classroom Resources
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shongwe, Benjamin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1306-3030
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 15
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1