Responsibility Center Budgeting as a Mechanism to Deal with Academic Moral Hazard
Saved in:
| Title: | Responsibility Center Budgeting as a Mechanism to Deal with Academic Moral Hazard |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Myers, Gordon M. |
| Source: | Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2019 49(3):13-23. |
| Availability: | Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education. P.O. Box 34091, RPO Fort Richmond, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5T5, Canada. Tel: 204-474-6404; Fax: 204-474-7561; e-mail: csshe@cc.umanitoba.ca; Web site: http://journals.sfu.ca/cjhe/index.php/cjhe/index |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Administration, Budgeting, Administrative Organization, College Faculty, Incentives, Income, Responsibility, Risk, Moral Issues, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Canada |
| ISSN: | 0316-1218 |
| Abstract: | Universities face inherent informational asymmetries. These make university budgeting prone to various challenges including moral hazard. The last forty years has seen some large research- intensive universities move from centralized incremental budgeting to decentralized Responsibility Center Budgeting (RCB). It is assumed that a faculty chooses a level of costly effort in generating revenue for the university. The level of faculty effort is not observable by the central administration. When there is no revenue uncertainty or when the faculty is not risk averse, pure RCB is best from the perspective of the administration. The intuition is that pure RCB fully aligns financial responsibility with academic authority, that is, it makes the faculty the residual claimant. Once the faculty is risk averse, partial RCB is optimal. Partial RCB provides a balance between providing the right incentives to the faculty and the university reducing the revenue risk faced by the faculty. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2019 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1237413 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwHxSQL2nMullQ6OOyGdaN-2AAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDB0HYLGR_IbE6wR7qAIBEICBm_eDDKS7xMxneIw4TOEwwTWyx0jqVDiKW4AqPbfCGvJs0MyPVpKel3QtocHUhbr702QL-pBm3jX5npZBxSv0JhDE5UiiHVRLnPlvUXGHrvQjM0wyRuMrrnGUWou5eVdc2VIMtXqdGPxVJtbvRg8yDZPQ2G7ga5JpYxdIXjsJXHRIRRsa0RIV-EuEFdSTdH8_zS2MB7pS4hC4uBen Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1237413 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1237413 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Responsibility Center Budgeting as a Mechanism to Deal with Academic Moral Hazard – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Myers%2C+Gordon+M%2E%22">Myers, Gordon M.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Canadian+Journal+of+Higher+Education%22"><i>Canadian Journal of Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2019 49(3):13-23. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education. P.O. Box 34091, RPO Fort Richmond, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5T5, Canada. Tel: 204-474-6404; Fax: 204-474-7561; e-mail: csshe@cc.umanitoba.ca; Web site: http://journals.sfu.ca/cjhe/index.php/cjhe/index – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Administration%22">College Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budgeting%22">Budgeting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Organization%22">Administrative Organization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incentives%22">Incentives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Income%22">Income</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responsibility%22">Responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk%22">Risk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+Issues%22">Moral Issues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0316-1218 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Universities face inherent informational asymmetries. These make university budgeting prone to various challenges including moral hazard. The last forty years has seen some large research- intensive universities move from centralized incremental budgeting to decentralized Responsibility Center Budgeting (RCB). It is assumed that a faculty chooses a level of costly effort in generating revenue for the university. The level of faculty effort is not observable by the central administration. When there is no revenue uncertainty or when the faculty is not risk averse, pure RCB is best from the perspective of the administration. The intuition is that pure RCB fully aligns financial responsibility with academic authority, that is, it makes the faculty the residual claimant. Once the faculty is risk averse, partial RCB is optimal. Partial RCB provides a balance between providing the right incentives to the faculty and the university reducing the revenue risk faced by the faculty. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1237413 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1237413 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 13 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Budgeting Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Organization Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Incentives Type: general – SubjectFull: Income Type: general – SubjectFull: Responsibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk Type: general – SubjectFull: Moral Issues Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Canada Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Responsibility Center Budgeting as a Mechanism to Deal with Academic Moral Hazard Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Myers, Gordon M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0316-1218 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 49 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Canadian Journal of Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |