Representation of Algebraic Reasoning in Sets through Argumentation
Saved in:
| Title: | Representation of Algebraic Reasoning in Sets through Argumentation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Uygun, Tugba, Guner, Pinar |
| Source: | International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. Dec 2019 6(2):215-229. |
| Availability: | International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. e-mail: ijceroffice@gmail.com; Web site: http://ijcer.net |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Preservice Teachers, Middle School Teachers, Mathematics Teachers, Mathematics Skills, Mathematical Logic, Algebra, Persuasive Discourse, Thinking Skills, Problem Solving, Problem Sets, Generalization, Mathematical Concepts |
| ISSN: | 2148-3868 |
| Abstract: | The purpose of the current study is to examine the ways in which preservice middle school mathematics teachers (PMSMT) apply and represent algebraic reasoning in their solution processes for the problems in the concept of sets. This model provides detailed information about the reasoning made through the process of the solution of set problems. The study group of this case study was composed of 20 preservice mathematics teachers. The data were collected through written documents and whole class discussions. Based on the findings of the study, three ways to represent algebraic reasoning in sets emerged; context-based representation of algebraic reasoning, generalization-based representation of algebraic reasoning and formulization-based representation of algebraic reasoning. These ways determined based on the argumentations that they formed. They produced different warrants since they reasoned differently. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1239370 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1239370 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1239370 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Representation of Algebraic Reasoning in Sets through Argumentation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uygun%2C+Tugba%22">Uygun, Tugba</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guner%2C+Pinar%22">Guner, Pinar</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Contemporary+Educational+Research%22"><i>International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</i></searchLink>. Dec 2019 6(2):215-229. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. e-mail: ijceroffice@gmail.com; Web site: http://ijcer.net – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teachers%22">Preservice Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+School+Teachers%22">Middle School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Teachers%22">Mathematics Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Skills%22">Mathematics Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Logic%22">Mathematical Logic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Algebra%22">Algebra</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Sets%22">Problem Sets</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Generalization%22">Generalization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Concepts%22">Mathematical Concepts</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2148-3868 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of the current study is to examine the ways in which preservice middle school mathematics teachers (PMSMT) apply and represent algebraic reasoning in their solution processes for the problems in the concept of sets. This model provides detailed information about the reasoning made through the process of the solution of set problems. The study group of this case study was composed of 20 preservice mathematics teachers. The data were collected through written documents and whole class discussions. Based on the findings of the study, three ways to represent algebraic reasoning in sets emerged; context-based representation of algebraic reasoning, generalization-based representation of algebraic reasoning and formulization-based representation of algebraic reasoning. These ways determined based on the argumentations that they formed. They produced different warrants since they reasoned differently. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1239370 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1239370 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 215 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Preservice Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle School Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematical Logic Type: general – SubjectFull: Algebra Type: general – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Sets Type: general – SubjectFull: Generalization Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematical Concepts Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Representation of Algebraic Reasoning in Sets through Argumentation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Uygun, Tugba – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Guner, Pinar IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2148-3868 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 6 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |