Discourse Analysis as Theory, Method, and Epistemology in Studies of Education Policy
Saved in:
| Title: | Discourse Analysis as Theory, Method, and Epistemology in Studies of Education Policy |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Anderson, Kate T. (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education Policy. 2020 35(2):188-221. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Educational Policy, Discourse Analysis, Epistemology, Computational Linguistics, Journal Articles, Policy Analysis, Authors, Guidelines, Correlation |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992 |
| ISSN: | 0268-0939 |
| Abstract: | Discourse has featured in studies of educational policy as an analytic and methodological tool, theoretical frame, realm of implication, and even a foundational definition of educational policy itself (e.g.) Despite the centrality of discourse as a frame for exploring educational policy and its implications, the ways that discourse is defined or operationalized in educational policy research are often left implicit which can lead to murky relations to larger onto-epistemological questions of how we construct findings from data as well as the nature of policy. In this interpretive analysis, we synthesize a corpus of 37 peer-reviewed journal articles that bring together educational policy and analyses of discourse from varying theoretical and methodological perspectives in order to better understand the breadth and scope of how discourse is defined and operationalized in studies of educational policy, including in ways that are sometimes incommensurate with authors' stated theoretical and methodological positions. After first laying the theoretical groundwork for analyses of discourse in the field of educational policy, we then illustrate how discourse analysis is used differently, and sometimes inconsistently, within contested paradigmatic landscapes. We conclude with an argument for discussions across theoretical frameworks and methodological paradigms about how the concept of discourse lends itself to different epistemological vantage points on educational policy. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1240502 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1240502 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Discourse Analysis as Theory, Method, and Epistemology in Studies of Education Policy – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anderson%2C+Kate+T%2E%22">Anderson, Kate T.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-6848">0000-0002-6086-6848</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holloway%2C+Jessica%22">Holloway, Jessica</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-3197">0000-0001-9267-3197</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+Policy%22"><i>Journal of Education Policy</i></searchLink>. 2020 35(2):188-221. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discourse+Analysis%22">Discourse Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemology%22">Epistemology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Journal+Articles%22">Journal Articles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Analysis%22">Policy Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Guidelines%22">Guidelines</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correlation%22">Correlation</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0268-0939 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Discourse has featured in studies of educational policy as an analytic and methodological tool, theoretical frame, realm of implication, and even a foundational definition of educational policy itself (e.g.) Despite the centrality of discourse as a frame for exploring educational policy and its implications, the ways that discourse is defined or operationalized in educational policy research are often left implicit which can lead to murky relations to larger onto-epistemological questions of how we construct findings from data as well as the nature of policy. In this interpretive analysis, we synthesize a corpus of 37 peer-reviewed journal articles that bring together educational policy and analyses of discourse from varying theoretical and methodological perspectives in order to better understand the breadth and scope of how discourse is defined and operationalized in studies of educational policy, including in ways that are sometimes incommensurate with authors' stated theoretical and methodological positions. After first laying the theoretical groundwork for analyses of discourse in the field of educational policy, we then illustrate how discourse analysis is used differently, and sometimes inconsistently, within contested paradigmatic landscapes. We conclude with an argument for discussions across theoretical frameworks and methodological paradigms about how the concept of discourse lends itself to different epistemological vantage points on educational policy. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1240502 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1240502 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 188 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Discourse Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Epistemology Type: general – SubjectFull: Computational Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Journal Articles Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Authors Type: general – SubjectFull: Guidelines Type: general – SubjectFull: Correlation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Discourse Analysis as Theory, Method, and Epistemology in Studies of Education Policy Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Anderson, Kate T. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holloway, Jessica IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0268-0939 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education Policy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |