Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design
Saved in:
| Title: | Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Baker, Fredrick W., III (ORCID |
| Source: | Review of Education. Feb 2020 8(1):305-333. |
| Availability: | Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 29 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Instructional Design, Content Analysis, Literature Reviews, Innovation, Citations (References) |
| DOI: | 10.1002/rev3.3186 |
| ISSN: | 2049-6613 |
| Abstract: | The purposes of this study are (1) to explore the concept of design thinking/human-centred design as expressed across the literature, using a systematic content analysis methodology, and (2) to arrive at empirically-based implications and recommendations for the instructional design field drawn from this search and analysis. Since 2000, design thinking has been highly sought after and is increasingly applied to novel challenges. Since then, it has become a force of innovation in business, and a point of contention in design--having created a reductionist perspective of design which has simultaneously become a buzzword for innovation. In the instructional design field, practitioners incorporate the methods used into new design models, and scholars frame new theories within its bounds. Through this process, the meaning and nature of the concept have become complex and clouded. This paper reports results of a systematic content analysis involving examination of 12 databases, analysing 1075 abstracts for fit and identifying 11 core articles. An extended literature review, including more than 70 non-core articles selected from the study data pool, provides a foundation for analysis of the 11 core articles. Results include analysis of the core articles for themes, industry and common citations; recommendations and implications for the instructional design field are drawn from the literature, as well as recommendations for future research. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1242467 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1242467 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Baker%2C+Fredrick+W%2E%2C+III%22">Baker, Fredrick W., III</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3973-1228">0000-0002-3973-1228</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moukhliss%2C+Sarah%22">Moukhliss, Sarah</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Review+of+Education%22"><i>Review of Education</i></searchLink>. Feb 2020 8(1):305-333. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 29 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Design%22">Instructional Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Analysis%22">Content Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Innovation%22">Innovation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Citations+%28References%29%22">Citations (References)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/rev3.3186 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2049-6613 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purposes of this study are (1) to explore the concept of design thinking/human-centred design as expressed across the literature, using a systematic content analysis methodology, and (2) to arrive at empirically-based implications and recommendations for the instructional design field drawn from this search and analysis. Since 2000, design thinking has been highly sought after and is increasingly applied to novel challenges. Since then, it has become a force of innovation in business, and a point of contention in design--having created a reductionist perspective of design which has simultaneously become a buzzword for innovation. In the instructional design field, practitioners incorporate the methods used into new design models, and scholars frame new theories within its bounds. Through this process, the meaning and nature of the concept have become complex and clouded. This paper reports results of a systematic content analysis involving examination of 12 databases, analysing 1075 abstracts for fit and identifying 11 core articles. An extended literature review, including more than 70 non-core articles selected from the study data pool, provides a foundation for analysis of the 11 core articles. Results include analysis of the core articles for themes, industry and common citations; recommendations and implications for the instructional design field are drawn from the literature, as well as recommendations for future research. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1242467 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1242467 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/rev3.3186 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 29 StartPage: 305 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Instructional Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Content Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Innovation Type: general – SubjectFull: Citations (References) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Baker, Fredrick W., III – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moukhliss, Sarah IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2049-6613 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Review of Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |