Using Smartphones as Experimental Tools--A Follow-Up: Cognitive Effects by Video Analysis and Reduction of Cognitive Load by Multiple Representations

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Using Smartphones as Experimental Tools--A Follow-Up: Cognitive Effects by Video Analysis and Reduction of Cognitive Load by Multiple Representations
Language: English
Authors: Hochberg, Katrin (ORCID 0000-0002-1623-1781), Becker, Sebastian, Louis, Malte, Klein, Pascal, Kuhn, Jochen
Source: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Apr 2020 29(2):303-317.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Telecommunications, Handheld Devices, Teaching Methods, Science Instruction, Student Interests, Scientific Concepts, Motion, Difficulty Level, Cognitive Processes, Science Experiments
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-020-09816-w
ISSN: 1059-0145
Abstract: Mobile devices (smartphones or tablets) as experimental tools (METs) offer inspiring possibilities for science education, but until now, there has been little research studying this approach. Previous research indicated that METs have positive effects on students' interest and curiosity. The present investigation focuses on potential cognitive effects of METs using video analyses on tablets to investigate pendulum movements and an instruction that has been used before to study effects of smartphones' acceleration sensors. In a quasi-experimental repeated-measurement design, a treatment group uses METs (TG, N[subscript TG] = 23) and a control group works with traditional experimental tools (CG, N[subscript CG] = 28) to study the effects on interest, curiosity, and learning achievement. Moreover, various control variables were taken into account. We suppose that pupils in the TG have a lower extraneous cognitive load and higher learning achievement than those in the CG working with traditional experimental tools. ANCOVAs showed significantly higher levels of learning achievement in the TG (medium effect size). No differences were found for interest, curiosity, or cognitive load. This might be due to a smaller material context provided by tablets, in comparison to smartphones, as more pupils possess and are familiar with smartphones than with tablets. Another reason for the unchanged interest might be the composition of the sample: While previous research showed that especially originally less-interested students profited most from using METs, the current sample contained only specialized courses, i.e., students with a high original interest, for whom the effect of METs on their interest is presumably smaller.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1250747
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first