Comparing Error Correction to Errorless Learning: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing Error Correction to Errorless Learning: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Leaf, Justin B., Cihon, Joseph H., Ferguson, Julia L., Milne, Christine M., Leaf, Ronald, McEachin, John |
| Source: | Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Jun 2020 36(1):1-20. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Error Correction, Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials, Teaching Methods, Behavior Modification, Behavior Problems, Responses, Mastery Learning |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s40616-019-00124-y |
| ISSN: | 0889-9401 |
| Abstract: | Errorless learning and error correction procedures are commonly used when teaching tact relations to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of both procedures, as well as compared them. The majority of these studies have been completed through the use of single-subject experimental designs. Evaluating both procedures using a group design may contribute to the literature and help disseminate research related to the behavioral science of language to a larger audience. The purpose of the present study was to compare an errorless learning procedure to an error correction procedure to teach tact relations to 28 individuals diagnosed with ASD through a randomized clinical trial. Several variables were assessed, including the number of stimulus sets with which participants reached the mastery criterion, responding during pre- and postprobes, responding during teaching, efficiency, and the presence of aberrant behavior. The results indicated that both procedures were effective, efficient, and unlikely to evoke aberrant behavior, despite participants in the error correction condition engaging in significantly more independent correct responses and independent incorrect responses. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1259378 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1259378 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparing Error Correction to Errorless Learning: A Randomized Clinical Trial – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leaf%2C+Justin+B%2E%22">Leaf, Justin B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cihon%2C+Joseph+H%2E%22">Cihon, Joseph H.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferguson%2C+Julia+L%2E%22">Ferguson, Julia L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Milne%2C+Christine+M%2E%22">Milne, Christine M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leaf%2C+Ronald%22">Leaf, Ronald</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McEachin%2C+John%22">McEachin, John</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Analysis+of+Verbal+Behavior%22"><i>Analysis of Verbal Behavior</i></searchLink>. Jun 2020 36(1):1-20. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Autism%22">Autism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pervasive+Developmental+Disorders%22">Pervasive Developmental Disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+Controlled+Trials%22">Randomized Controlled Trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Modification%22">Behavior Modification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Problems%22">Behavior Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responses%22">Responses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mastery+Learning%22">Mastery Learning</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s40616-019-00124-y – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0889-9401 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Errorless learning and error correction procedures are commonly used when teaching tact relations to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of both procedures, as well as compared them. The majority of these studies have been completed through the use of single-subject experimental designs. Evaluating both procedures using a group design may contribute to the literature and help disseminate research related to the behavioral science of language to a larger audience. The purpose of the present study was to compare an errorless learning procedure to an error correction procedure to teach tact relations to 28 individuals diagnosed with ASD through a randomized clinical trial. Several variables were assessed, including the number of stimulus sets with which participants reached the mastery criterion, responding during pre- and postprobes, responding during teaching, efficiency, and the presence of aberrant behavior. The results indicated that both procedures were effective, efficient, and unlikely to evoke aberrant behavior, despite participants in the error correction condition engaging in significantly more independent correct responses and independent incorrect responses. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1259378 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1259378 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s40616-019-00124-y Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Error Correction Type: general – SubjectFull: Autism Type: general – SubjectFull: Pervasive Developmental Disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Randomized Controlled Trials Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Modification Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Responses Type: general – SubjectFull: Mastery Learning Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparing Error Correction to Errorless Learning: A Randomized Clinical Trial Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leaf, Justin B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cihon, Joseph H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferguson, Julia L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Milne, Christine M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leaf, Ronald – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McEachin, John IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0889-9401 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 36 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Analysis of Verbal Behavior Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |