Measuring Scientific Process Skills with Different Test Formats: A Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Styles
Saved in:
| Title: | Measuring Scientific Process Skills with Different Test Formats: A Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Styles |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Aydin Ceran, Sema (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health. 2020 6(3):220-230. |
| Availability: | Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health. Necmettin Erbakan University, Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, Meram, Konya 42090, Turkey. e-mail: jeseh.info@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.jeseh.net |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Grade 7 Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Science Process Skills, Test Format, Cognitive Style, Measures (Individuals), Grade 7, Middle School Students, Multiple Choice Tests, Performance Based Assessment, Individual Differences, Public Schools, Comparative Testing, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Turkey (Ankara) |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Group Embedded Figures Test |
| ISSN: | 2149-214X |
| Abstract: | Considering that each student has a different cognitive structure, in addition to providing students with the perspective of a scientist, evaluating this acquisition; it is an important dimension of science education in the context of measurement and evaluation. In this context, the scientific process skills (SPS) of the students with different cognitive styles were examined and it was aimed to interpret the SPS measured in different test format according to cognitive styles. The study was a causal comparison and the study group consisted of 40 students at the seventh-grade level. Cognitive styles of the students were determined by using Group Embedded Figures Test. Open-ended, performance-based and multiple-choice tests were used to evaluate the scientific process skills. Criteria scales were used in the evaluation of open-ended and performance based SPS tests. The data were analyzed by MANOVA method which is a multivariate analysis of variance. Findings indicated that students with field independent cognitive style are more successful in multiple choice SPS test. However, it was concluded that there was no significant difference between mean scores of students in the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive style in both open-ended and performance-based SPS tests. Within the scope of the research, possible factors causing this result such as the difference of students' cognitive style tendencies, the test format used to measure scientific process skills, or the structure of the measured scientific process skills were discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1259905 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1259905 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1259905 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Measuring Scientific Process Skills with Different Test Formats: A Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Styles – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aydin+Ceran%2C+Sema%22">Aydin Ceran, Sema</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-2766">0000-0001-6847-2766</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ates%2C+Salih%22">Ates, Salih</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0982">0000-0003-0425-0982</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+in+Science%2C+Environment+and+Health%22"><i>Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health</i></searchLink>. 2020 6(3):220-230. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health. Necmettin Erbakan University, Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, Meram, Konya 42090, Turkey. e-mail: jeseh.info@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.jeseh.net – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Process+Skills%22">Science Process Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Format%22">Test Format</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Style%22">Cognitive Style</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measures+%28Individuals%29%22">Measures (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+School+Students%22">Middle School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Choice+Tests%22">Multiple Choice Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Based+Assessment%22">Performance Based Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Differences%22">Individual Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Testing%22">Comparative Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Turkey+%28Ankara%29%22">Turkey (Ankara)</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Group+Embedded+Figures+Test%22">Group Embedded Figures Test</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2149-214X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Considering that each student has a different cognitive structure, in addition to providing students with the perspective of a scientist, evaluating this acquisition; it is an important dimension of science education in the context of measurement and evaluation. In this context, the scientific process skills (SPS) of the students with different cognitive styles were examined and it was aimed to interpret the SPS measured in different test format according to cognitive styles. The study was a causal comparison and the study group consisted of 40 students at the seventh-grade level. Cognitive styles of the students were determined by using Group Embedded Figures Test. Open-ended, performance-based and multiple-choice tests were used to evaluate the scientific process skills. Criteria scales were used in the evaluation of open-ended and performance based SPS tests. The data were analyzed by MANOVA method which is a multivariate analysis of variance. Findings indicated that students with field independent cognitive style are more successful in multiple choice SPS test. However, it was concluded that there was no significant difference between mean scores of students in the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive style in both open-ended and performance-based SPS tests. Within the scope of the research, possible factors causing this result such as the difference of students' cognitive style tendencies, the test format used to measure scientific process skills, or the structure of the measured scientific process skills were discussed. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1259905 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1259905 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 220 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Science Process Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Format Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Style Type: general – SubjectFull: Measures (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 7 Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple Choice Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Based Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Turkey (Ankara) Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Embedded Figures Test Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Measuring Scientific Process Skills with Different Test Formats: A Research from the Perspective of Cognitive Styles Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aydin Ceran, Sema – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ates, Salih IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2149-214X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 6 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |