The Significance of the Disappearance of 'Diverse' from 'Guaranteeing Educational Opportunities': An Interpretation from the Viewpoint of the Victory of Formalism and the Educational Consumer

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Significance of the Disappearance of 'Diverse' from 'Guaranteeing Educational Opportunities': An Interpretation from the Viewpoint of the Victory of Formalism and the Educational Consumer
Language: English
Authors: Kuraishi, Ichiro
Source: Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook. Mar 2020 (14):69-84.
Availability: Japanese Educational Research Association. #102, Creart Kanda Building, 2-15-2, Kanda-Sudacho, Chiyoda-ku,Tokyo, 101-0041. Tel: +81-3-3253-6630; Fax: +81-3-3254-0477; e-mail: edit@jera.jp; Web site: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/esjkyoiku
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Legislation, Educational Opportunities, Public Education, Diversity, Politics of Education, Evening Programs, Junior High Schools, Educational Change
Geographic Terms: Japan
ISSN: 1881-4832
Abstract: The so-called "Educational Opportunity Guarantee Act 2016" was adopted and established in the National Diet in December 2016. As is well known, it gained impetus through lobbying from people involved with alternative "free schools," pursuing a stable position within the system, along with the night junior high school movement. This process, in which a discussion that shakes the foundations of public education as a whole was brought to the fore by the margins of the public education system, is extremely interesting. Elsewhere, the final text of the law is sharply distinguished from its original plan, and has been severely criticized by people involved in the movement. This paper focuses on the point among these that both in word and in deed, the concept of "diverse" has disappeared from the initial "guaranteeing diverse educational opportunities." With guidance from the arguments of David F. Labaree, this paper interprets the process of this alteration (loss) as the triumph of formalism over actualism in education, a "victory" for the educational consumers who view public education as private property. [Translated by Nadezhda Murray.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1261749
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first