View in EDS

Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges
Language: English
Authors: Omar, M. K. Al-Mahasneh (ORCID 0000-0001-6902-9109), Mohammad, N. M. Ayasrah, Shima, M. S. Yahyaa, Raed, A. Al-Kriemeen, Ali, S. Al-Swalha
Source: International Journal of Education and Practice. 2020 8(2):365-378.
Availability: Conscientia Beam. 19-C, Sunset Lane 3, DHA Phase 2 extension Karachi, Pakistan. e-mail: editor@conscientiabeam.com; Web site: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Preferences, College Students, Blended Learning, Electronic Learning, Synchronous Communication, Asynchronous Communication, Experiential Learning, Problem Based Learning, Critical Thinking, Active Learning, Student Projects, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Field Trips, Multiple Choice Tests, Observation, Performance Based Assessment, Portfolio Assessment, Gender Differences, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Jordan
ISSN: 2311-6897
Abstract: The present study aimed to identify the favorite methods of teaching and evaluation among students in university colleges. The study adopted a descriptive survey design; self-administered copies of the questionnaire were used to generate data from 1638 students at university colleges, selected by a random sample method. Frequency and percentage were used to analyze data. The findings showed 12 methods of teaching preferred by students (flipped learning, blended learning, simultaneous e-learning, asynchronous e-learning, virtual learning, scientific trips, training in the workplace, problem-solving, critical thinking, visitor lecture, learning by project and activities, and discussion) and seven methods of evaluation preferred by students (evaluation by multiple-choice test, true and false test, observation, written test, interview (face to face), evaluation of performance, and evaluation of portfolio). The results also showed that the teaching method preferred by students is the flipped learning method, where it received the highest frequency 1575 (96%); the evaluation method preferred by students is evaluation by multiple-choice, where it received the highest frequency 1623 (99%). The teaching method preferred by males and females is the flipped learning method; the evaluation method favored by males is the true and false test, and the multiple-choice test is the preferred evaluation method for females. According to the results, the researchers recommended that the faculty members of university colleges use the teaching and evaluation methods preferred by students.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1264650
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1264650
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1264650
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Omar%2C+M%2E+K%2E+Al-Mahasneh%22">Omar, M. K. Al-Mahasneh</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-9109">0000-0001-6902-9109</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mohammad%2C+N%2E+M%2E+Ayasrah%22">Mohammad, N. M. Ayasrah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shima%2C+M%2E+S%2E+Yahyaa%22">Shima, M. S. Yahyaa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raed%2C+A%2E+Al-Kriemeen%22">Raed, A. Al-Kriemeen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ali%2C+S%2E+Al-Swalha%22">Ali, S. Al-Swalha</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Education+and+Practice%22"><i>International Journal of Education and Practice</i></searchLink>. 2020 8(2):365-378.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Conscientia Beam. 19-C, Sunset Lane 3, DHA Phase 2 extension Karachi, Pakistan. e-mail: editor@conscientiabeam.com; Web site: http://www.conscientiabeam.com/journal/61
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 14
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preferences%22">Preferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Synchronous+Communication%22">Synchronous Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asynchronous+Communication%22">Asynchronous Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiential+Learning%22">Experiential Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Based+Learning%22">Problem Based Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+Thinking%22">Critical Thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion+%28Teaching+Technique%29%22">Discussion (Teaching Technique)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Field+Trips%22">Field Trips</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Choice+Tests%22">Multiple Choice Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Observation%22">Observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Based+Assessment%22">Performance Based Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Portfolio+Assessment%22">Portfolio Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Differences%22">Gender Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Jordan%22">Jordan</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2311-6897
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The present study aimed to identify the favorite methods of teaching and evaluation among students in university colleges. The study adopted a descriptive survey design; self-administered copies of the questionnaire were used to generate data from 1638 students at university colleges, selected by a random sample method. Frequency and percentage were used to analyze data. The findings showed 12 methods of teaching preferred by students (flipped learning, blended learning, simultaneous e-learning, asynchronous e-learning, virtual learning, scientific trips, training in the workplace, problem-solving, critical thinking, visitor lecture, learning by project and activities, and discussion) and seven methods of evaluation preferred by students (evaluation by multiple-choice test, true and false test, observation, written test, interview (face to face), evaluation of performance, and evaluation of portfolio). The results also showed that the teaching method preferred by students is the flipped learning method, where it received the highest frequency 1575 (96%); the evaluation method preferred by students is evaluation by multiple-choice, where it received the highest frequency 1623 (99%). The teaching method preferred by males and females is the flipped learning method; the evaluation method favored by males is the true and false test, and the multiple-choice test is the preferred evaluation method for females. According to the results, the researchers recommended that the faculty members of university colleges use the teaching and evaluation methods preferred by students.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1264650
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1264650
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 365
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Preferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Blended Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Synchronous Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Asynchronous Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experiential Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Problem Based Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical Thinking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Active Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discussion (Teaching Technique)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Field Trips
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple Choice Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Performance Based Assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Portfolio Assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Jordan
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Omar, M. K. Al-Mahasneh
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mohammad, N. M. Ayasrah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shima, M. S. Yahyaa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Raed, A. Al-Kriemeen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ali, S. Al-Swalha
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2311-6897
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 8
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Education and Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1